authorityresearch.com

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6

The Institution for Authority Research

About, Issues, Articles, Booklet, Schedule, Material, Scheduling, Audios, Radio, Sources, Textus Receptus, Class, Warnings, Thanks! P.S.

Please contact me by email (deangotcher@gmail.com) if there are any broken links on this website, you have questions, or desire to host a meeting and/or support this work.

Important information for all parents (and children) to know—whether homeschooling or not.
Homeschooling and the Dialectic Process. (pdf) Exam. (pdf)

The so called "new" world order is based upon this primes:

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once his feelings, thoughts, and actions and relationship with others is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority system]." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"Education" has "shifted" from "right-wrong" (authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., righteousness/doing right and not wrong—according to the parent's standards) based thinking to "feelings" of the 'moment' (opinion, i.e., child, i.e., sensuousness/pleasure-pain/self-world) based thinking (called a "Paradigm 'shift'"—from the Patriarchal Paradigm of obedience to parents to the Heresiarchal Paradigm of questioning and challenging their authority), engendering a culture of patricide and incest, the hallmark of psychotherapy. Every parent should know about their child's classroom experience and reading material: how and why facilitators of 'change' are coming between the father and his children, as the Serpent came between "the Father and His 'children'" in the garden in Eden, "helping" children praxis dialectic 'reasoning, i.e., '"self 'justification,'" i.e., "helping" children 'liberating' themselves (their "self") from the father's/Father's authority system, "progressively" moving their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and relationship with others away from "doing right and not wrong" (according to their parent's standards) toward not just thinking about but also doing what they "feel" like doing in the 'moment.' Through the use of dialogue, in a "group" setting ("dialogue group," "consensus group," "group therapy," etc.), children, with "group" approval or "affirmation," are able to ''liberate' and 'justify' their "thoughts" (opinions) of the 'moment,' i.e., have pleasure or "peace" (initiate and sustain relationship) with themselves and the world in the 'moment' without having a "guilty conscience" questioning and challenging their parent's authority, i.e., disobeying their parents, i.e., doing wrong. By putting their 'common' opinions, i.e., their common "feelings" (consensus) into "group," social, or "community" action (praxis) they are able to satisfy (actualize) their own and others "feelings" (desires or interests) of the 'moment,' negating the father's/Father's authority system (the "guilty conscience" for disobedience and/or for doing wrong) in their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with one another in the process.

Through their use of dialectic 'reasoning' in the "group grade," i.e., "group psychotherapy" classroom environment—with "educators," i.e., facilitators of 'change' "helping" students (the father's children) solve personal-social "problems"—children no longer have a "guilty conscience" questioning and challenging their parent's authority, i.e., disobeying their parents, i.e., doing wrong. The "Educational Objective" of the school system today is to "help" children negate the father's/Father's authority system in their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with one another. "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual comes to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." "In fact, a large part of what we call 'good teaching' is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives ['liberating' the children's' feelings] through challenging the student's fixed beliefs [getting the students to question and challenge the father's/Father's authority system in order to initiate and sustain 'change']." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 2, Affective Domain) Both Cognitive and Affective Domain Books, commonly referred to as "Bloom's Taxonomies" have been updated by Marzano and Webb. All teachers must learn how to (and then) apply them in the classroom if they are to be "certified" and all institutions of learning (from the pre-school to the University, "Christian" included) must use them as their curriculum if they are to be "accredited."

Diaprax is the dialectic process, i.e., the 'justification' of "Self," i.e., the dialoguing of opinions ("self interests") to a consensus (to a "feeling" of "oneness") over and therefore against the father'/Father's authority system being put into social action (praxis). It is the praxis of establishing children's "feelings" over and therefore against "unnatural" restraints, i.e., over and therefore against parental authority—which prevents (inhibits or blocks) children from satisfying (actualizing) their natural (carnal) desires of the 'moment.' It is the same procedure (dialectic, consensus, or soviet process) being used in local, state, and national, secular and religious meetings today where policy is being made in order (as "new" world order) to initiate and sustain 'change'—'liberating' man from Godly (the Father's) restraint, i.e., opening "Pandora's box," a box full of evils (wickedness), which, once opened, can not be closed—resulting in government no longer "serving and protecting" the traditional family (the father's authority over his family, property, and business) but "serving and protecting" unrighteousness and abomination (socialism) instead. "The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box." ibid. "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

The father's/Father's authority system (parental/Godly restraint) engenders a "guilty conscience" in children, making them "feel bad" for doing wrong—in their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with one another—thus (according to those promoting dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., facilitators of 'change') engendering "repression" and "alienation." It is the objective of those promoting dialectic 'reasoning' to 'liberate' the children's natural (carnal) desires of the 'moment,' thus 'liberating' their natural dissatisfaction (resentment or hatred) toward authority, not only in their feelings, thoughts, and actions of the 'moment,' but in the relationship they have with one another as well. It is therefore the praxis of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., "building relationship upon 'Self interest,'" i.e., putting dialectic 'reasoning' (questioning and challenging authority—without having a "guilty conscience," i.e., without "feeling" bad in doing so) into social action (called praxis) that results in unrighteousness and abomination (sinning with impunity) becoming the law of the land (with man serving the laws of the flesh and sin over and therefore against the commands of God—what Immanuel Kant called "lawfulness without law," i.e., the law of the man's carnal nature 'liberated' from the commands or restraints of God, resulting in man loving the pleasure of the 'moment, i.e., himself and the world [that which is "positive"], hating those who preach and teach Godly restraint [those who are "negative"). "No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Luke 16:13 "If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." 1 John 2:15b

No father gives his children commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted as is (by faith) and obeyed and then tells them to 'compromise' them if they get in the way of their initiating and/or sustaining relationship with others. The consensus (dialectic) process does just that, "encouraging" children to "set aside" the father's commands, rules, facts, and truth (negate the father's/Father's authority system in their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with others) in order to "get along" with others, i.e., in order (as in "new" world order) to become at-one-with the world, negating the father's voice in them, i.e., the "guilty conscience" for doing wrong in the process. "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them." Colossians 3:5-7

World unity and social harmony ("Worldly unity and Socialist harmony" ), i.e., globalism i.e., "Making the world safe for Democracy" can not be initiated and sustained while the father's/Father's authority system (the "guilty conscience" for disobeying and/or for doing wrong) is still in place in the children's' thoughts and actions, initiating and sustaining "private convictions," preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking 'change.' A little dialectic 'reasoning' goes a long ways. If 'justified' and practiced in one area of the child's life (even for "good"), it will eventually be 'justified' and practiced in all areas of the child's life.

Communism (common-ism) is the praxis of "building relationship" or "community" through the use of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., through "Self" 'justification,' using the consensus process, i.e., the groups "feelings" of the 'moment' to establish policy, i.e., to determine "right" from "wrong" for the 'moment,' i.e. for the current situation, making 'change' the law of the land. "Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state [i.e., to best suit those facilitating the consensus 'meeting']." (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law) While hard line Marxists, i.e., Traditional Marxists used outright force to initiate and sustain Communism (common-ism), "contemporary" Marxists, i.e., Transformational Marxists, facilitator's of 'change, psychotherapists (all three being the same) use the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus to achieve the same end (using force or the threat of it, i.e., crime only to move the process along). The Berlin wall did not come down because communism was defeated. It came down because communism had succeeded, in the form of a "velvet revolution," i.e., through the use of the classroom, the consensus process (bipartisanship), and social media.

The following information explains how and why the dialectic process ("Self" 'justification') is being put into social action (praxis). Praxis is the consensus process (dialectic 'reasoning,'"Self 'justification,'" i.e., you evaluating your "Self" and the world around you according to your "Self interest," i.e., according to your carnal desires of the 'moment' and responding accordingly—aufheben) being put into social, i.e., "group" or "community" action, 'changing' the way you, and when they participate, your children, spouse, relatives, neighbors, educators, employer, fellow workers, police and police chief, sheriff, representatives, judges, mayor, governor, president, and even minister feel, think, and act toward authority and relate with others—with "in and for 'Self,'" i.e., "'Self' esteem," i.e., "group affirmation," i.e., "the pride of life" 'justifying' your negation of humbling, denying, controlling, and disciplining your "Self" (under authority), letting "Self" direct ("enlighten," "illuminate") your paths instead. "Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Luke 11:35 "O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23

While "intellectuals," i.e., the "enlightened," i.e., the "illuminated" laud dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., man 'justifying' his sinful nature so that he can sin with impunity (deceiving himself and those who listen to him into believing that it is just "academics," worshiping those who have advanced dialectic 'reasoning, promoting "Self" 'justification' down through the ages), none dare expose it for what is, "an abomination in the sight of God." "Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

God did not create evil. He is good and created that which is good. When we 'justify' our "Self" over and therefore against His will, i.e., when we think dialectically, i.e., according to our flesh and the world, according to our heart's desire of the 'moment', i.e., deceiving ourselves, believing that our wicked heart is "good," and act accordingly, i.e., disobey Him, we create evil, calling it "good." Being holy, pure, and righteous (in and of Himself), the Father is the same yesterday, today, and forever, i.e., unchanging (with "no shadow of turning"), the same is true of His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ—who, though being equal with God, yet being sent by the Father, humbling himself and taking on the form of a man, i.e., being born of the Spirit and the flesh, was obedient to His Heavenly Father in all things commanded, but we, being born of the flesh (sensuous), with life's situations affecting our "feelings" of the 'moment,' are ever subject to 'change,' i.e., are born into sin. Dialectic 'reasoning' establishes ('justifies') "human nature," i.e., the lust of the flesh and eyes, and the pride of life ("self-'justification'"), i.e., our sinful nature over and therefore against the Father's authority, turning "good" (the Father's authority) into "evil" and "evil" (our carnal nature, i.e., that which is of the world) into "good." Rejecting the preaching and teaching of the truth, i.e., the Word of God, accepting it as is, by faith and obeying without question, we, according to our carnal inclination (carnal desires) turn to dialoguedialoguing our opinion, i.e., how we are "feeling" in the 'moment,' in the "light" of the current situation, with ourselves and with others—in order to do and/or get what we want, perceiving it as being "good" (when we get our way). "There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 14:12

We are all born into this world with our carnal nature—approaching pleasure and avoiding pain, i.e., desiring pleasure and resenting restraint. It is our parent's authority system (their restraint, i.e., their rewarding and chastening of us for our actions) that introduces us to doing right—having to obey their commands, rules, facts, and truth (by faith), and not doing wrongwrong being our disobeying their commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., doing what we want to do when we want to do it, i.e., "'living' in the 'moment'," i.e., being "of and for ourselves" instead. According to dialectic 'reasoning,' we can not be our "Self," i.e., as we were before our parent's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into our lives, restraining us, preventing us from being ourselves, i.e., carnal (of the world only) until we learn to "accept" ('justify') our carnal nature again, i.e., regard it as being "normal," perceiving their commands, rules, facts, and truth as being "irrational" ("out of touch with the times") and therefore their authority system as being "irrelevant" ("out of date") in a world of "rapid 'change.'" Instead of our parent's "top-down" authority system being the structure of society, with us being personally held accountable to a "higher authority," i.e., to our parents, to our teacher, to our boss, , , to the Lord God for our thoughts and actions (engendering individualism, under God and a guilty conscience for doing wrong), those possessed with dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., perceiving us as being "equal " in nature, i.e., carnal (as "blank tablets," coming into this world neither evil nor good, recognizing only our affections, needing proper conditioning in order to become "good," instead of our sinful nature, i.e., our disposition or propensity to love the pleasures of the world over and therefore against any authority which restrains us), are intent in 'liberating' us, our children, etc., i.e., all of mankind from the father's/Father's authority (and restraint), thereby engendering anarchy and socialism (unrighteousness and abomination) in the name of "worldly peace and socialist harmony," placing themselves, as facilitator's of 'change,' psychotherapist's, Transformational Marxist's (all three being the same), in authority instead, replacing the Father of mercy and grace with "children of disobedience," i.e., children of hate and violence—when they do not or can not get their way. With pleasure becoming the 'drive' of life and the augmentation of pleasure its 'purpose' (instead of doing right and not wrong), killing anyone (be it the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the helpless, or the righteous) who gets in the way (of pleasure, i.e., progress) becomes the way of "life."

Replacing the preaching of commands and rules, the teaching of facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith (and obeyed "or else"), and the discussing of things misunderstood or done wrong (at the discretion of the one in authority), i.e., replacing the "top-down" (hierarch) pattern or system of the "old world order" (with children knowing right from wrong because they have been told) with the dialoguing of opinions with one another ('discovering' what we all have in common, i.e. what we all do privately within our "Self," talking to our "Self" about our desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment,' i.e., about how the world "is"—with parents restraining us, preventing us from being ourselves, and how it "ought" to be—tolerant of our carnal/natural desires, 'justifying' our resentment toward restraint and our dissatisfaction with authority, sharing with others how we are "feeling" and what we are "thinking" in the 'moment') to a consensus (to a "feeling" of "oneness"), i.e., initiating and sustaining the pattern or system of the so called "new world order," we become subject to "the group," i.e., to the society of impulses and urges instead. No longer having to hold our "Self" accountable to our parents, , , the Lord God (practicing "self" control, "self" discipline, "self" restraint, humbling and denying our "self" in order to do right and not wrong, i.e., doing that which is lacking in society today) we become, through dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., through "Self 'justification,'" i.e., through "esteeming" our "Self," 'liberated' from Godly restraint, no longer having a "guilty conscience" for doing wrong, engendering, i.e., 'justifying' a culture of unrighteousness and abomination, sinning with impunity instead. We discuss what we know, i.e., what we have been told, i.e., what we have been taught or have learned in the past. We dialogue our opinion, i.e., how we "feel" in the 'moment.' By evaluating God's Word, the world, and our "Self" from our 'reasoning' (according to our opinion, i.e., according to our feelings, thoughts, and actions of the 'moment,' i.e., according to our desires and dissatisfactions), instead of evaluating our 'reasoning,' i.e., our "Self" and the world from God's Word (according to truth, requiring faith), we turn God into the image of man, 'liberating' man from Godly restraint, i.e., 'liberating' him from knowing the truth, turning our children over to those who are "of and for their 'Self'" only, with God letting us and our children have their way (untill judgment day). "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6 In other words, because we have refused to "trust in the Lord with all our heart," "acknowledging Him in all our ways," he will remove his hand of protection over our children, turning them over to the world, which knows no mercy or grace.

Dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., "Self 'justification'" 'liberates' our personal "feelings" of the 'moment' from the restraints of the "past," i.e., from the knowledge which we learned from our father/Father—which prevents (inhibits or blocks) 'change'—making us subject (reactive) to the situation, i.e., to the "crisis" of the 'moment' instead. It is what mental and social health (the so called "Health Care Package") is all about. The distance between you (your feelings, thoughts, and actions of the 'moment,' including your relationship with others) and the father's/Father's authority system (doing right and not wrong, i.e., 'judgmentalism,' i.e., "prejudiced" to facts and not the "feelings" of the 'moment') determines where along the spectrum of mental and social health you (and your children) reside in any given 'moment.' The closer you, i.e., your feelings, thoughts, and actions and the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., the standards of the "past" are, the "less healthy" you are. The farther they are apart (in other words: the closer your "feelings," thoughts, and actions of the 'moment' are—desire/augmenting pleasure, i.e., desiring "group approval," i.e., augmenting community-socialism, and resenting/attenuating restraint, i.e., resenting and working to over come [negate] the father's/Father's authority system—in the 'light' of the and through the current situation), the "more healthy" you are. In a "globalist minded society," i.e., in a democratic, bipartisan, tolerant of deviancy environment, the individual (under God) becomes of little or of no worth or value unless he is willing to "repent" ('compromise') and serve and protect the collective, i.e., "the people," i.e., at least tolerating (if not participating in) the depravity of man. If you are silent in the midst of unrighteousness, refusing to reprove, correct, or rebuke unrighteousness, because you desire the approval of men, i.e., approval or affirmation of "the group," unrighteousness becomes the "norm," i.e., "abomination" becomes the law of the land.

Diaprax is man's praxis or social action of using dialectic 'reasoning, i.e., Genesis 3:1-6—the dialectic process, i.e., "Self 'justification,'" i.e., aufheben, i.e., "enlightenment," i.e., evaluating himself, the world, and God's Word according to his carnal desires of the 'moment,' revealing ('liberating') his resentment toward restraint, negating the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., negating Hebrews 12:5-11 in order to negate the guilty conscience for doing wrong (for sinning), i.e., in order to negate Romans 7:14-25. By negating (denying) the deceitfulness and wickedness of his heart and God's judgment upon him for his sins, the need for a savior (faith in the Son of God and obedience to His Heavenly Father) is negated in man's feelings, thoughts, and actions, i.e. in the relationship he has with himself and the world. Despite all the "academics," this is what the dialectic process has always been about—man, through dialoguing his opinion with himself and with others, 'justifying' himself, i.e., 'justifying' his carnal desires of the 'moment' in defiance to authority. No matter what 'liberals' might say (in denial), Socrates was, and they (and anyone else who 'reasons' dialectically) are guilty of two things, corrupting the morals of the youth and destroying their respect for (toward) authority. The same is true for all who praxis philosophy, sociology, and psychology. Their objective is not to attack religion or authority outright (keeping authority in place), but rather to 'change' the way children think. Their dialectic 'logic' being: "help" children 'justify' "human nature," i.e., 'justify' their carnal desires of the 'moment' and their resentment toward authority, and faith in God will "wither away." The objective of dialectic 'reasoning' is never to let a crisis (personal and/or social) go to waste—using it to "bring people together" (to "build community") based upon their "feelings" of the 'moment' (sensuousness), i.e., based upon being concerned about pleasure and sight, i.e., 'living' in the 'moment,' instead of being concerned about where they will spend eternity (individual accountability before God) based upon doing right and not wrong (righteousness), i.e., faith and obedience.

An Overview of the Dialectic Process (pdf), Endnotes (pdf)
Diaprax Exposed: Exposing the formula for 'change.' (pdf, dbl. sp.)note
Introduction to the Dialectic Process: how the dialectic process affects you.

By focusing upon the child's "feelings" of the 'moment,' by making the child's nature the ground of being, his desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' (his desire or "lust" for the pleasures of the 'moment' and his dissatisfaction toward restraint and the restrainer), i.e., the child's opinion of the world (thinking about how the world "is"—under parental and/or Godly restraint, and how it "ought" to be—tolerant of his carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., philosophy, i.e., man's opinion) supersedes the authority of the parent and God, making their commands, rules, facts, and truth "irrational" (impractical) and therefore their authority "irreverent" (of the past), thereby negating the "guilty conscience" in the child (the father's voice, i.e., his commands, rules, facts, and truth in the child) for doing wrong, i.e., for sinning, allowing the child to sin with impunity, allowing him to think and act (called theory and practice) according to his perception of the "new" world order that he has created out of his own imagination, a "new" world order subject to his carnal nature, "of and for 'Self"' only over and therefore against the "old" world order which is subject to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., subject to his preaching and teaching of commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed as given (by faith), teaching his children to humble, deny, control, and discipline themselves in order to do right and not wrong, despite their missing out on the pleasures of the 'moment' and having to endure pain, including the pain of missing out on the pleasures of the 'moment' ("repression") and the rejection of men ("alienation"), for judging them, i.e., for making them "feel" bad, i.e., "feel guilty" for doing wrong, i.e., for sinning, i.e., for being "normal," i.e., for being "human," i.e., for being children ("children of disobedience") in adult bodies, i.e., for being "of and for their 'Self'" and the world only.

"And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:4-5, 12 "... and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12

George Hegel believed that "the child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once his feelings, thoughts, and actions and relationship with others is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority 'system']." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life) According to this "logic" (dialectic 'reasoning'), all that is of the child, i.e., of his carnal nature negates all that is the father's, i.e., his children, his wife, his property, his business, and even his very own soul, making them all (including his children) subject to the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., to the psychologist, i.e., the psychoanalyst and the psychotherapist, etc., i.e., to the one(s) "helping" the children 'liberate' themselves out from under their father's authority. Hegel then wrote (sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself): "On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [thinking and acting according to their human (carnal) nature, that which is of the world only], where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [with no father's authority over the children (and no husbands authority over the wife) and no God's authority over man, all things begin "equal"], the surplus is not the property of one of them [there is no privilege of private, as in private property or business, i.e., no borders or sovereignty, i.e., no "Mine. Not yours." i.e., no "My wife. Not yours."; "My children. Not yours."; "My property. Not yours."; "My business. Not yours."—"My garden. Not yours."], since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one [since there is no one or no thing establishing one above the other (themselves above another]." ibid. There is a consequence to basing 'reality' upon the nature of the child and your desire for their approval, i.e., basing right and wrong upon the pleasures of the 'moment,' anyone (especially those with have the power of government in hand) who attains or desires to attain pleasure from your spouse, your children, your property, your business, or you has as much "right" to them (or you) as you do, i.e., you have not right to restrain them.

Marx wrote: "once the earthly family [the earthly father's authority 'system'] is discovered to be the secret of the holy family [the Heavenly Father's authority 'system'], the former [the earthly father's authority 'system'] must itself be annihilated [vernichtet] theoretically and practically [in the child's feelings, thoughts, and actions and in his relationship with others]." (Karl Marx, Theses On Feuerbach #4) Sigmund Freud wrote: "'it is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [that the father's/Father's authority 'system' no longer has relevance]." (Sigmund Freud as quoted in Herbart Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud) "Freud noted that patricide [the children killing and "devouring" their father, negating his authority over them] and incest [the children carrying out their carnal impulses and urges of the 'moment,' i.e., having sensual (sexual) relationship with their mother and one another] are part of man's deepest nature." (Irvin Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy) Freud, believing that all children were sexually active, saw sex as being the greatest pleasure of all. Therefore, according to Freud, the only way to 'liberate' man, i.e., to 'liberate' the sexual nature of the child in man, was to 'create' a "new" world order based upon the nature of the child, "helping" the child 'liberate' his "Self" from the father's/Father's authority system, making his "Self," i.e., his carnal desires of the 'moment' ("of 'Self'") the 'drive' of life and the augmentation of pleasure ("for 'Self'") the 'purpose' of life.

While Marx attempted to kill the father's/Father's authority system in society and Freud tried to kill it in the individual. It took psychotherapy (Transformational Marxism), i.e., the merging of Marx and Freud to accomplish the deed, with the parent's, the children, and the community (the world) doing it in the "group psychotherapy" session, i.e., in the consensus (soviet) meeting, not only in the neighborhoods, the townships, the cities, towns, and villages, the counties, the states, and the nations, but in the "church" as well. "Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transform public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests.... transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine [Godly restraint]; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers [facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychotherapists], having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables [unto their own imaginations]." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

"For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:3-6

"Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:21-32

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 1997-2016