authorityresearch.com

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6
"It is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23

The Institution for Authority Research

About, Issues, Articles, Links, Booklet, Schedule, Material, Scheduling, Audios, Radio, Sources, Textus Receptus, Class, Warnings, Thanks!, P.S., Donate.
deangotcher@gmail.com.
(
Note regarding the censorship of this website by McAfee.)
Bracketed information in quotations and verses is information added by me.

Diaprax:
(Facebook mentality)

by
Dean Gotcher

Introduction of Part 1
(Part 2, Part 3)

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

   The "old" world order is associated with the father's/Father's authority, , i.e., Hebrews 12:5-11, with children having to obey the father, i.e., having to do the father's will. The "new" world order is associated with the carnal nature of child, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the child's desire ("lust") for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates and his resentment or hatred toward the father/Father and his/His authority, which gets in his way. The "new" world order, 'driven' by the child's carnal nature, i.e., "human nature" is therefore 'purposed' in augmenting pleasure, i.e., the child's carnal nature over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, 'justifying' the negation of the "old" world order, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's dictums of "lawfulness without law," i.e., the law of the flesh without the law of God, and "purposiveness without purpose," i.e., "enjoying" the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates without having to do what the father/Father says, thereby no longer having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning against the father/Father. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) It is the carnal nature of fallen man, i.e., "human nature" to love the pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and hate restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority. If you support the father's/Father's authority, the child's carnal nature is restrained. If you support the child's carnal nature, the father's/Father's authority has to be negated. Georg Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud had this one agenda in mind, 'liberating' the children, and therefore the world from the father's/Father's authority, negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process.
   This explains the attitude of 'liberals,' acting as spoiled, unthankful, hateful children when confronted with or restrained by 'conservative' principles, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, manifesting their love of pleasure (love of the world) and their hate of restraint (hate of the father/Father authority), as children of disobedience doing what they can to rule the world (as a "big brother")—believing that you, your children, your spouse, your friends, your leaders, etc., are like them, i.e., a child or children of disobedience (just not accepting it yet, i.e., still in "denial"), needing their "help" in order to be converted (or at least become tolerant of them), or be silenced and removed instead. The hallmark of philosophy, socialism (all form of socialism from Common-ism to Fascism), psychology, anthropology, "contemporary" theology, etc., i.e., "group psychotherapy" (which began in the garden in Eden, with the "help" of the first and master facilitator of 'change', i.e., seducer, deceiver, and manipulator of men, women, and children—Genesis 3:1-6), is the praxis of someone coming between the father/Father and his children, 'liberating' them from his/His authority by "encouraging" them to dialogue their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' (affirming) their "self" before one otherwashing their brain of the father's/Father's authority, turning them against the father/Father so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity, i.e., so they can be of and for their "self," i.e., of and for their carnal nature and the world only, doing wrong, disobeying, sinning without having a guilty conscience, seeing no evil in their deceitful and wicked ways, i.e., in their unconscionable, abominable deeds (praxis), therefore seeing no need to repent and be saved—Romans 7:14-25. "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain) This from the books all teachers are certified and schools are accredited by today, referred to as "Bloom's Taxonomies," 'changing' teachers into therapists, i.e., councilors, i.e., social-ist engineers, i.e., facilitators of 'change.' "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16

The "old" world order is in similitude to God telling Adam not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, "lest ye die," i.e., "lest ye" lose your inheritance, which is the tree of life (as a father telling his children, "Do what I say." "Because I said so," or else you will not be in my will). The "new" world order is in similitude to the Serpent, as a facilitator of 'change,' telling the woman that she would not die if she disobeyed, "beguiling" her, i.e., seducing, deceiving, and manipulating her into believing that she could do what she wanted to do, when she wanted to do it, when it "seemeth right unto" her, i.e., seemed to be "reasonable," i.e., "rational," i.e., "practical" to her in the 'moment' despite it being in opposition to God's will, i.e., that she could do wrong, disobey, sinned against God, i.e. disobey the Father and not be held accountable, thereby in her (and Adam's) praxis of disobedience, i.e., doing her will instead of God's, i.e., choosing sensuous knowledge, i.e., "sense experience" ("the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" which the world stimulates) over and therefore against the Word of God (faith which leads to obedience), abdicating her inheritance of eternal life (which is a gift from God for obedience) for the pleasures of the 'moment' (which is "of the world" only, which is temporary, i.e., which is passing away), resulting in her, along with Adam (who joined her in disobedience, then, together with the woman, both acting as "liberal's," refusing to repent, blaming someone or something else for their problems, i.e., for their sins) being cast out of the garden, resulting in all men, who in defiance to God, i.e., who, as children of disobedience reject the Father's authority, doing their will instead, dying in their sins, missing out on eternal life, having to endure eternal death instead. "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 1 John 2:15

Diaprax is the dialectic process, i.e., "self" 'justification' being put into praxis (practice or social action). It is the manifestation of the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's love of the things of the world, refusing to humble, deny, die to his "self" in order to do the father's/Fathers' will, hating the father/Father for chastening him when he does wrong, disobeys, sins, turning against the Father instead (who, loving his/His children chastens them that they might learn to do right, obey, not sin, and live, i.e., so they might receive an inheritance from Him). As the prodigal son, thinking life was all about the pleasures of the 'moment,' using up his inheritance for his carnal desires, in the act of humbling, denying, dying to his "self," returning to the father, 'discovered' his inheritance was his father's love for him. Children can not separate their hate of missing out on the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which they desire and their hatred toward the one inhibiting or blocking them. The father on the other hand, while hating his children's bad behavior of doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, loves his children, disciplining them in order that they might learn to do right, obey, and not sin, i.e., learn to discipline and control their "self", i.e., grow up and be mature instead. Father's who "love the world" and "the things that are in [it]" are children in adult bodies (which describes most father's today, i.e., forty year old playing with toys), using the office of authority God gave them for their own carnal "self"-ish pleasure and gain. Children can, on the other hand, having been chastened by their father for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, repenting and desiring to do their father's will instead, have "the love of the father" in them, loving others while hating what they are doing, even to them. The same is true of man (as a child of God), repenting, turning from his wicked ways, i.e., humbling, denying, dying to his "self" daily, doing his Heavenly Father's will, having "the love of the Father" in him for others, even when they, in sin, are doing wrong to him—something a "child" who is "of and for self" can never understand. The gospel message is after all about a Son who came to tell us about His Heavenly Father, i.e., who wants us to know His Heavenly Father, i.e., to know His Heavenly Father's love for us. The dialectic process is all about rejecting that love, i.e., the love of the Father since it gets in the way of man's love for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates, a love which never satisfies, i.e., which is always passing away.

"Ye are they which justify yourselves [your "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "pride of life"] before men;" Luke 16:15

Diaprax is man 'justifying' his "self," i.e., 'justifying' his desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, i.e., his "love of the world," i.e., his "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "pride of life" through the praxis (social or group action) of dialoguing his opinion, i.e., sharing his "feelings" and "thoughts" of the 'moment' with others (in a "group psychotherapy," i.e., facilitated meeting), setting aside, i.e., suspending as on a cross, any command, rule, facts, or truth, i.e., his "private convictions" which get in the way of "building relationships," in order (as in "new" world order, which is based upon the child's carnal nature) to come to a consensus, i.e., to a "feeling" of "oneness" with his "self," others, and the world, putting dialectic or dialogic 'reasoning,' i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., his "lusts," i.e., his desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation), which the world stimulates, including his desire for the approval of men, i.e., affirmation, and his dissatisfaction with restraint, i.e., his dissatisfaction with the father's/Father's authority (the "old" world order, which is based upon the father's/Father's authority, with children doing the father's/Father's will) into social action (praxis), 'liberating' his "self," i.e., the child's carnal nature from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., negating the father's/Father's authority in his feelings, thoughts, and actions as well as in his relationship with others and the world, i.e., washing his brain of the father's/Father's authority thereby negating his having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, so that he (along with his newly found "friends" of the world, 'discovered' through dialogue, as children of disobedience, in consensus, i.e., void of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., void of parental/Godly restraint, i.e., void of having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning) can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity, i.e., so that he (along with his newly found "friends" of the world, 'discovered' through dialogue, as children of disobedience, in consensus, i.e., void of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., void of parental/Godly restraint, i.e., void of having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning) can do unconscionable things with no sense of accountability, having 'justified' his deceitful and wicked thought and actions (along with his "friends'") as being necessary for the 'liberation' of all children from the father's authority. "So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12

"Every one that is proud in heart [who 'justifies' his "self," i.e., his carnal desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment,' i.e. who establishes "self," i.e., "human nature" as being equal with, therefore above, therefore against God, i.e., the Father's authority, thus negating the Father's authority in his thoughts and actions] is an abomination to the LORD: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished." Proverbs 16:5

   Diaprax is man's praxis of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., of man 'justifying' his "self," being affirmed by and affirming one another, negating Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority in his feelings, thoughts, and actions, as well as in his relationship with others and the world, thereby negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., negating the need for contrition, repentance, and forgiveness, i.e., redemption and reconciliation, having a "fit" instead, when the father/Father gets in his way.
  Diaprax, i.e., putting "self " 'justification' into social action, negating the father's/Father's authority, and thereby the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process is what Georg Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud had in mind. God has warned us of diaprax, i.e., of the praxis of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., of the praxis of "self" 'justification,' i.e., of the praxis of the so called "new" world order where children of disobedience rule, dialoguing their opinions to a consensus in facilitated, "group psychotherapy" meetings, establish their "self," i.e., their carnal nature, i.e., "human nature" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., living for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' rejecting the Father's authority, rejecting eternal life, choosing eternal death instead.

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24

"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8, 9

"Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." James 4:4

Behind closed doors:

When you attend a meeting where you are asked to be "positive" and not "negative," you are being "encouraged" by a facilitator of 'change' to dialogue your opinion with others to a consensus, preparing your "self" and your children, spouse, neighbors, co-workers, leaders to participate in the "new" world order, a world void of the father's/Father's authority, where you, including your children, your spouse, etc., can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience. Setting aside, i.e., suspending, as on a cross, your "private convictions" in order to be "positive," i.e., in order to be affirmed by "the group" means you are promoting the broad path "that leadeth to destruction." "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." Matthew 7:13-15

Continued ....

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 1997-2017