DIAPRAX is the
Practice (praxis) of Dialectic Reasoning:
Evaluating God and His Word through Human Perception and Human Reasoning (dialectic reasoning), 'Justifying' Human Nature over (and therefore against) God's Authority in the process, 'liberating' man from God's restraints.
DIAPRAX is the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6
where God's commands are seen as non-sensuous (unreasonable, irrational, impractical, and therefore irrelevant) in an "enlightened" society (Aufheben).
"Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Luke 11:35
Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Diaprax, the dialectical process put into praxis (practice), is the Heresiarchal paradigm of Genesis 3:1-6 (the 'justification' of sinning) being made the law of the land, creating ("'rationally' justifying" and putting into practice) a "new" order of the world ("New World Order") out of the 'pure' sensuousness of man, where righteousness is negated (man is 'purged' of righteousness) and abomination abounds.
SATAN THE FIRST FACILITATOR OF 'CHANGE.'
Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman,
Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
And the woman said unto the serpent,
We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
"neither shall ye touch it"
"lest ye die."
And the serpent said unto the woman,
"Ye shall not surely die:"
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat,
and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: ... Genesis 3:17
Subtle use of discourse to draw her "Ought"―her "Nor touch it"―out of her.
"Yea, ... garden?" is an embedded statement in a question known as Neurolinguistics - Most powerful tool in hypnosis. Neurolinguistics is used to destabilize and then sensitize a person to his subconscious desires. It generates a cognitive dissonance event in the person.
GIVE ONLY YOUR NAME, RANK, AND SERIAL NUMBER
The facilitator must engage his victim in a "discourse-theoretical interpretation" if he is to gain control over the person.
Eve paraphrases God's command. By stating an opinion instead of the categorical imperative―an unquestionable and universally applied moral command― a person divulges their "ought." In Eve's case her desire to "touch it." If she had stating the Categorical Imperative, as Jesus did in the temptations―"It is written ....,"―she would not have been able to share her feeling of resentment toward the restraint of the law.
Any time a "THOU SHALT NOT" blocks our hearts desire, an "OUGHT" is created―The imagination of the heart, where our "potential" identity, apart from Godly or parental restrain, can be secretly role played.
Our "OUGHT" is always good in our own eyes. It is desires which make sense to us, restrained by higher authorities non-sense.
If the "OUGHT" is given freedom of expression with no fear of reprisal the "THOU SHALT NOT," which initiated it, is negated, at least is in our eyes.
THE LIE―HALF TRUTH
Adam and Eve did not die from the specific fruit of the tree, the fruit of the tree did not kill them, they died because they disobeyed God, making their flesh the foundation from which to determine right from wrong.
From here on Eve does not defend God's "Thou shalt not".
The facilitator of 'change' always makes himself equal with (and therefore greater than) the authority figure he is preparing you to disobey.
Again: the lie was that they would not die. They did not die from the fruit of the tree, the tree did not kill them. They died because God removing them from the tree of life for changing their paradigm from faith to sight, from obedience to Him and His Word to their disobedience to his command, i.e. from trusting in Him with all their Heart, to leaning to their own understanding. Proverbs 3:5. We are made in the image of God, to evaluate the world from His Word (as God does). By evaluating God's Word from our sensuousness, good and evil becomes establish upon our sensuousness, i.e. trusting in our 'reasoning,' and no longer from God's righteousness, no longer having faith in God and loving His Word.
FROM HERE ON EVE USES INDUCTIVE REASONING, NEGATING DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Eve was the first environmentalist, choosing to love the creation over the creator, loving pleasure more than God.
Truth is now based upon perception (sight).
ADAM WAS NOT DECEIVED. ADAM ABDICATES―CHOOSES EVE OVER GOD―HE KNEW BETTER.
Adam was the first socialist, communist, humanist, globalist, on the face of the earth, choosing self interest and human relationship over God.
The negation of negation―"Eternal life was not negated until they ate." "But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death." James 1:14, 15
Adam and Eve were the first socialists, blaming somebody else (or the environment) for their bad behavior, i.e., for their sins. "It's not my fault, its (__fill in the blank__)'s fault."
Satan's dialectical process: "Feel it, think it, 'justify it,' do it ... sin."
DIAPRAX (Hegel's dialectical process put into Marx's and Freud's praxis) IS THE PROCESS OF SINNING (BECOMING AT-ONE-WITH THE WORLD), i.e. DOING GENESIS 3:1-6, i.e. PARTICIPATING IN SATAN'S GENESIS 3:1-6 PROJECT, i.e. creating a world of 'change.'
For all have sinned. Romans 3:23
"There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulcher; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: their feet are swift to shed blood: destruction and misery are in their ways: and the way of peace have they not known: there is no fear of God before their eyes. Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin." Romans 3:10-20
"For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, fear him." Luke 12:2-5
(THE NEGATION OF DIAPRAX IN YOUR LIFE).
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God." John 3:16-21
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2006-2015