SATAN THE FIRST FACILITATOR OF 'CHANGE.'

Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman,

Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

And the woman said unto the serpent,

We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

"neither shall ye touch it"

"lest ye die."

And the serpent said unto the woman,

"Ye shall not surely die:"

For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat,

and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: ... Genesis 3:17

Subtle use of discourse to draw her "Ought"―her "Nor touch it"―out of her.
(The plan is by getting her 'ought' out, she will negate God's 'not,' with some 'help,' i.e. facilitation, then go to 'thought' to justify her 'ought,' freeing herself of Godly righteousness, making herself 'right' in her own eyes.)

"Yea, ... garden?" is an embedded statement in a question known as Neurolinguistics - Most powerful tool in hypnosis. Neurolinguistics is used to destabilize and then sensitize a person to his subconscious desires. It generates a cognitive dissonance event in the person.

GIVE ONLY YOUR NAME, RANK, AND SERIAL NUMBER

The facilitator must engage his victim in a "discourse-theoretical interpretation" if he is to gain control over the person.

The woman paraphrases God's command. By stating an opinion instead of the categorical imperative―an unquestionable and universally applied moral command― a person divulges their "ought." In the woman's case her desire to "touch it." If she had stating the Categorical Imperative, as Jesus did in the temptations―"It is written ....,"―she would not have been able to share her feeling of resentment toward the restraint of the law.

Any time a "THOU SHALT NOT" blocks our hearts desire, an "OUGHT" is created―The imagination of the heart, where our "potential" identity, apart from Godly or parental restrain, can be secretly role played.

Our "OUGHT" is always good in our own eyes. It is desires which make sense to us, restrained by higher authorities non-sense.

If the "OUGHT" is given freedom of expression with no fear of reprisal the "THOU SHALT NOT," which initiated it, is negated, at least is in our eyes.

THE LIE―HALF TRUTH

Adam and the woman did not die from the specific fruit of the tree, the fruit of the tree did not kill them, they died because they disobeyed God, making their flesh the foundation from which to determine right from wrong.

From here on the woman does not defend God's "Thou shalt not".

The facilitator of 'change' always makes himself equal with (and therefore greater than) the authority figure he is preparing you to disobey.

Again: the lie was that they would not die. They did not die from the fruit of the tree, the tree did not kill them. They died because God removing them from the tree of life for changing their paradigm from faith to sight, from obedience to Him and His Word to their disobedience to his command, i.e. from trusting in Him with all their Heart, to leaning to their own understanding. Proverbs 3:5. We are made in the image of God, to evaluate the world from His Word (as God does). By evaluating God's Word from our sensuousness, good and evil becomes establish upon our sensuousness, i.e. trusting in our 'reasoning,' and no longer from God's righteousness, no longer having faith in God and loving His Word.

FROM HERE ON THE WOMAN USES INDUCTIVE REASONING, NEGATING DEDUCTIVE REASONING.

The woman was the first environmentalist, choosing to love the creation over the creator, loving pleasure more than God.

Truth is now based upon perception (sight).
God's word, in the woman's eyes, becomes non-sensuous,' irrational, therefore God's Word became, in the 'light' of her senses, 'irrelevant.' She now has the mind of Lucifer to temp others to do the same dialectical process, i.e. tempting Adam. The woman had peace as she ate the fruit, satisfying her "self," i.e., her carnal desire. Adam ate the fruit, affirming her 'reasoning,' making truth subject to human 'reasoning,' i.e., "self" 'justification.'

ADAM WAS NOT DECEIVED. ADAM ABDICATES―CHOOSES EVE OVER GOD―HE KNEW BETTER.

Adam was the first socialist, communist, humanist, globalist, on the face of the earth, choosing self interest and human relationship over doing God's will.

The negation of negation―"Eternal life was not negated until they ate." "But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death." James 1:14, 15

Adam and the woman were the first socialists, blaming somebody else (or the environment) for their bad behavior, i.e., for their sins. "It's not my fault, its (__fill in the blank__)'s fault." Adam "threw the woman under the bus" and the woman "threw the Serpent," like 'liberals' refusing to admit they were "wrong."