In Depth Explanation Of The Dialectic Process And Its Effect Upon You And The Country

authorityresearch.com

Proverbs 3:5, 6 "Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths."

In Depth Explanation Of The Dialectic Process
And Its Effect Upon You And The Country.

For the Marxist, Socialist, Communist, Globalist it is not the law that is the problem, it is the enforcment of it. When you remove the Father's authority, "the field of force of an adult," the fear of God, accountability for one's actions from the child's life (from his or her thoughts) all you have is a Marxist lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, hating anyone who gets in the way, removing them without having a guilty conscience. LUST engenders HATE, which then 'justifies' VIOLANCE. It is an absolute. It is the dialectic process (psychology), where dialogue (what the child WANTS) establishes right and wrong behavior instead of discussion (what the Father says). It is the law of the land today, Immanuel Kant's "lawfulness without law" where the law of the flesh rules without the Law of God getting in the way. György Lukács (a Marxist, the founder of the Frankfurt School which we are now under the influence of): "... the central problem is to change reality. . . . reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?) "Bloom's Taxonomies," by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today (including Christian) are founded upon the Marxist ideology of the "Frankfurt School," merging Karl Marx, "the group" and Sigmund Freud, the individual, both of whom hated the Father's authority. Benjamin Bloom noted that his "taxonomies" are the "Weltanschauung" (political system) of two Marxists, Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno. Both were members of the "Frankfurt School." "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." Laws which come through discussion ("What does my Father want me to do?") retain the Father's authority. Laws which come through dialogue ("What can I get out of this situation, these people, this person, this office, this position for MY self, to satisfy MY lusts ?"), when done in a group dialoguing their opinions to a consensus ("What can WE get out of this situation, these people, this person, this office, this position for OUR self, to satisfy OUR lusts ?") eradicate the Father's authority. Who turns to the Father for direction when what He says gets in the way of what they WANT? Only the believer in the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ.

When you tolerate unrighteousness, unrighteousness becomes the norm. Jürgen Habermas (a member of the "Frankfurt School") "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." (The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy) KNOWING by being TOLD plus the "field of force of an adult" equals having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Doing what you are TOLD equals "What would my parents want me to do?" equals individualism, under God aka unalienable rights. Making dialogue, what you want subject to discussion, to what the Father says keeps the Father in authority, with the Father establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior, holding you accountable for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, with the Father having the final say. Knowing by "sense experience" plus affirmation from others aka by "the group" equals no guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, producing a "super-ego" which is based upon compromise for the sake of initiating and sustaining relationship with one another. Doing what you want instead of what you are TOLD, with the group's affirmation equals "What will the 'group think?'" aka "group think" or "class consciousness" aka socialism aka human rights. Making discussion, what the Father says subject to dialogue, to what you want, eradicates the Father's authority when it comes to defining and establishing behavior resulting in you being able to do wrong, disobey, sin without fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out, removing anyone who gets in your way (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) without having a guilty conscience. In discussion two plus two equals four and can not be any other number, an XX chromosome is a girl, an XY chromosome is a boy, and life begins at conception (these are absolutes, the same yesterday, today, and forever, with no shadow of turning, and not a respector of persons) In dialogue two plus two can be any number you think it is in the moment, an XX and an XY chromosome can be anything you want them to be, and life begins whenever you want it to begin. Those who are of and for the world know this and do not want you to know.

If you do not start with, go through, and end with the Word of God you KNOW nothing about where you are going and what is happening to you. Without God's Word you do not KNOW. Wilfred Bion (a Marxist): ". . . prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (A Memoir of the Future) Apart from the Father and His Son Jesus Christ all we have is "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," only that which is "of the world," what Karl Marx (secularizing the scriptures) called "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience," which are "only of Nature." 1 John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." Erich Fromm (a Marxist; a member of the Frankfurt School): "In the process of history man gives birth to himself. He becomes what he potentially is, and he attains what the serpent - the symbol of wisdom and rebellion - promised, and what the patriarchal, jealous God of Adam did not wish: that man would become like God himself." (You shall be as gods: A radical interpretation of the old testament and its tradition) Stephen Bronner: "In fact, it is probably fair to say that Erich Fromm's Marx's Concept of Man introduced the young Marx to America and provided the dominant interpretation of this thinker [Marxism] for the students of the New Left [the Democratic Party]." "Fromm gave the humanitarian, idealist, and romantic proponents of the New Left a Marx they could love." (Of Critical Theory and its Theorists) Both Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud hated the FATHER'S authority, the father ruling over man (over "the group" aka over society) and over the children (in the home) preventing them from becoming themselves, thinking and acting according to their carnal nature and sought to destroy the FATHER and his authority that got in the way. "Bloom's Taxonomies" (by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today, including christian) were built upon Karl Marx's and Sigmund Freud's ideology which were merged and promoted by the "Frankfurt School." Our framing Fathers did not get rid of the King. They made your father King, ruling over his home, his property, his business according to his convictions which (according to the Marxist Kurt Lewin) creates the guilty conscience, a civil society. By coming between the parents and their children (and between the parents themselves) through dialogue getting them to express their lusts and their dissatisfaction with having to do what they are told the father's authority is "washed' from the brain - doing it in the group with "the group" 'justifying' the individual's lusts "the group" takes the father's place - what happened in the garden in Eden. Norman O. Brown (a Marxist explaining Sigmund Freud, the purpose of psychology): "To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" Carl Rogers: "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." Jürgen Habermas: "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (the founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." Jürgen Habermas "The revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life, which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents]." Irvin D. Yalom: "Freud noted that patricide and incest are part of man's deepest nature." "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." (The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

In a nutshell it is all about the father's authority in the home - how to destroy it in the thoughts and actions of the children (the next generation of citizens). He is perceived as the source for the belief in God, who judges and condemns man's carnal nature, casting man out for doing what comes natural, lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. By replacing discussion (where the father authors commands, rules, facts, and truth to be obeyed and applied, having the final say) with dialogue (where children do what they want, having the final say, at least in their mind) when it comes to defining and establishing behavior the father's authority (both on the earth and in Heaven) are negated since there is no father's authority in dialogue, there is only the child's desire to enjoy the carnal pleasures (lusts) of the 'moment' that the world stimulates trying to figure out how to get around or remove any barrior. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Herbert Marcuse, a Marxist explaining psychology, the political system of Sigmund Freud: "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression - a 'barrier to incest,' . . . the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same." (Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud) Norman O. Brown (a Marxist explaining Sigmund Freud, the purpose of psychology): "Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." "To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" (Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) Benjamin Bloom: "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." Benjamin Bloom cited two Marxists (members of the Frankfurt School) as the "Taxonomies" political system, its "Weltanschauung," Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno).

What Is A Facilitator of 'Change'?

The facilitator of change (the serpent in the garden) takes the place of the Father, replacing discussion (what the Father says, with the Father having the final say) with dialogue (with how the children feel, with the children having the final say) - replacing "I KNOW" with "I FEEL" or "I THINK" - when it comes to defining and establishing behavior turning the children against the Father and His authority. WARNING: All teachers are certified and schools accredited today (christian including) by their use of "Bloom's Taxonomy," in the classroom, which have invaded home schooling material and co-ops. They were developed by Marxists to sear the conscience of all who participate, damn their soul, and curse the nation (turning the children against their parent's and God's authority).

"Bill of Rights" (Unalianable rights) => Your Father (supported by traditional education) as King (telling those under his authority when it comes to behavior what they can and can not do, with him if there are any questions, through discussion having the final say; "Rule of Law") ruling over his family, his property, his business according to his convictions "What does our Father want us to do?" engendering a guilty conscience for doing wrong or disobeying in all who are under his authority, creating a civil society (Constitutional Republic).

"Bloom's Taxonomies" (Marxist curriculum; Humanist rights) => Facilitators of 'Change' as the serpent did in the garden in Eden coming between the children and the Father, through dialogue ("What I or WE want to do?") when it comes to defining and establishing behavior liberating the children from the Father's authority in order for them to do what they want without restraint "You can't tell us what we can or can not do," engendering rebellion, anarchy, and revolution, "owning" the children => the breeding ground of the deep state, the swamp, the shadow government, the military, medical, legislative, educational, etc. establishments (the drug cartel), searing the conscience, damning the soul of all who participate, cursing (destroying) the nation (Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Globalism aka "Group Think"). No one will stop it because everyone wants to do what they want to do without restraint. Once you open Pandora's box you can't close it, once you light the fire you can't put it out. Proverbs 16:25 "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Luke 11:35 "Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Beware that the light (enlightenment) within thee ("What can I get out of this situation, this object, these people, this person, this office for my self, to feed my lusts?") is not darkness (the pathway to Hell). Martin Luther (The founder of the Protestant Reformation): "I greatly fear that the universities, unless they teach the Holy Scriptures diligently and impress them on the young students, are wide gates to hell. I would advise no one to send his child where the Holy Scriptures are not supreme. Every institution that does not unceasingly pursue the study of God's word becomes corrupt." "Miserable Christians, whose words and faith still depend on the interpretations of men and who expect clarification from them! This is frivolous and ungodly. The Scriptures are common to all, and are clear enough in respect to what is necessary for salvation and are also obscure enough for inquiring minds . . . let us reject the word of man." Max Horkheimer (a Marxist, along with György Lukács who founded the "Frankfurt School," a group of Marxists who came to the States in the early thirties advancing Marxism from the Federal level down through the use of psychology, through the use of dialogue ("What can I or WE get out of this situation, this object, these people, this person, this office for MY or OUR self?") when it comes to defining and establishing behavior, turning the children against the Father and His authority): "Protestantism [individualism, under God] was the strongest force in the extension of cold rational individualism."

Three Paradigms: Patriarch - Matriarch - Heresiarch. Which one are you?

A very lengthy overview. (Quotations and Verses.) Not for the faint hearted (the word 'endure' has meaning here) making it clear where all this is coming from and where it is taking us. If you 'endure' to the end you will clearly KNOW what is happening and what you need to do.

Introduction

Discussion: 1) doing right and not wrong according to what you have been told, 2) being held accountable for doing wrong which engenders a guilty conscience, 3) with the one in authority having the final say. Dialogue: 1) lusting after pleasure and hating restraint 2) silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in you way without having a guilty conscience, 3) with you having the final say (at least in your mind). For individualism (under God), Sovereignty, Nationalism; rule of law. What to look for in the classroom: discussion + individuals + teacher. For Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Globalism; rebellion and revolution. what to look for in the classroom: dialogue + group + facilitator.

In 1922 the First Marxist Work Week (Erste Marxistische Arbeitswoche), headed by György Lukács took place in Thuringia, Germany. They met on how, through the use of psychology (dialogue) to advance Marxism around the world. Working under the title the Institute for Social Research they continued their research in Frankfurt, Germany, thus gaining the title the "Frankfurt School." Most of its members came to America in the early 30's. Their praxis of merging Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud (Marxism and psychology), "the group" and the individual, replacing individualism, under God with "the group" is now being put into praxis through the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom. It is an attack upon the father's authority in the home. Through the use of dialogue (Sigmund Freud) and "the group" (Karl Marx) the father's authority is eradicates ("washed") from the child's mind (and therefore from the child's actions, resulting in the child doing what he wants instead of what he is told, concerned about what "the group" might think instead of the Father). Through the merging of dialogue and the "group grade" classroom, with the aid of a facilitator of 'change' (you need the serpent in the garden, the master facilitator of 'change,' the master group psychotherapist, the master social psychologist to make it work) the deed is done. The Frankfurt School's formula for bringing America (and the rest of the world) under Marxist (Globalist) control is: a diverse group of people (incorporating the deviant), dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (having to put aside their father's authority in order to be a part of "the group," ["group dynamics" Kurt Lewin, an editor of the Frankfurt School's magazine; Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, Journal for Social Research] in order for "the group" to get a good grade or to advance), over personal-social issues, in a facilitated meeting, to a pre-determined outcome that once you have experienced defying your father's authority in order to be a part of "the group" you can not "unexperience" having replaced what the father says, the father's authority with what the "group thinks," aka "Class Consciousness." Dialogue ties you to the many below, to what you and everyone else has in common, your and their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and resent restraint. Discussion ties you to the one (the parents, the teacher, the boss, the leader, God) above, telling you what to do, holding you accountable if you do wrong, disobey, sin (if you lust after pleasure instead of doing what you are told). Irvin D. Yalom (a Marxist, advancing the ideology of the Frankfurt School): "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." "There is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity; and the individual rejects critical feelings toward the group at this time to avoid a state of cognitive dissonance. To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance. Long cherished but self-defeating beliefs and attitudes may waver and decompose in the face of a dissenting majority." Kurt Lewin: "The group to which an individual belongs is the ground for his perceptions, his feelings, and his actions." "It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." "The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." "Change in methods of leadership [I add, replacing the father, "can not," "thou shalt surely die" with the facilitator of 'change,' "can" "Ye shalt not surely die"] is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." Karl Marx: "Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former [your father's authority] must then itself be destroyed [eradicated] in theory and in practice [it must be "washed" from your mind, directly affecting your actions]." Herbert Marcuse (explaining Sigmund Freud's history): "the hatred against patriarchal suppression" "a 'barrier to incest,'" "the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." Carl Rogers: "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." Martin Jay: "As the Frankfurt School wrestled with how to 'reinvigorate Marx,' they 'found the missing link in Freud [psychology].'" Dialogue (Sigmund Freud, psychology) + "the Group" (Karl Marx, Marxism), when it comes to defining and establishing behavior = Marxism (Father consciousness is replaced with Class Consciousness or Group Think). Abraham Maslow: "Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [eradication of the Father's authority] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [the Father's authority] stunt human nature."

The use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," (Marxist curriculum) in the classroom converts students into Marxists. Benjamin Bloom: "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." Benjamin Bloom cited two Marxists (members of the Frankfurt School) as the "Taxonomies" political system, its "Weltanschauung," Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno). Jürgen Habermas (a member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (the founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." Jürgen Habermas "The revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life, which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents]." "Building relationship upon self interest [lust, which leads to hate, which leads to violence]." is Marxism. (Obama, see picture) It is all about the money ("drug money"), moving it out from under the parents control through the GO's and NGO's (the corporate's) to the elected officials; the NGO's are the offshore banks for the elected officials, so they have access to their "drug money," their reward for passing laws to fund the GO's and NGO's (and pay them well) at the taxpayers (the father's) expense. The facilitated, dialoguing opinions to a consensus, "group grade" classroom is the breeding ground of Marxism, searing the conscience, damning the soul, cursing the nation. The guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning is created by the father's authority in the home, by the "induced field of force of an adult." Discussion therefore (where the Father has the final say) engenders the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Bohm and Peat: "In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Science, Order, and Creativity) Kurt Lewin (explaining how the guilty conscience is created and how to negate it): "The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." Dialogue, when it comes to defining and establishing behavior, eradicates the father's authority and therefore the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Bohm and Peat: "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Science, Order, and Creativity) You "suspend," get rid of the father's authority when you build relationships with others through dialogue, upon "self interest." Dialogue is the language of the Karl Marx in your heart, when it comes to behavior just waiting for the facilitator of 'change' and "the group" to affirm it. Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" You can not see your heart as being wicked, "desperately wicked" because your lust for pleasure, the Karl Marx in you is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Luke 16:15 "And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." The dialectic process is the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6 (self 'justification'), negating Hebrews 12:5-11 (the Father's authority), negating Romans 7:14-25 (the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning) so all can sin with impunity, with no fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out. 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein."

Explaining the dialectic process, used to define and establish behavior, replacing the earthly father's authority in the home and the Heavenly Father's authority above man (the key word being discussion, where the children and men are told what they can and can not do with the Father having the final say; you KNOW because you have been told) with the children's feelings (the key word being dialogue, where the children can do what they want, with them having the final say - at least in their mind). When you understand the difference between the two, discussion (the Father) and dialogue (the children) (the bourgeoisie and the proletariat) you understand what is happening to you and the world around you when one form of communication is used when it comes to defining and establishing behavior rather than the other. Discussion and dialogue are two different political systems. Which one you start with determines the outcome. Those "of and for the world" seek to, as Wilfred Bion stated it "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space [prevent what the Father says from being in the thoughts of the child, affecting the child's actions]." Since money (to the child, including those in adult bodies is stored of pleasure or "drug money") is involved, when the Father controls it the child has to do what the Father says (be moral) in order to gain access to it (be paid) while those "of and for the world" (Marxists) want to gain access to and control the money in order to do what they want (play in the field of immorality and get paid, paid well) without restraint (with "the people's" affirmation - if you do not affirm them or get in their way you will be labeled, silenced, censored, and removed). You are already being labeled, silenced, censored, and removed (in the mind of the participants) when, in the meeting or classroom you are told to "be positive and not negative." Anyone insisting upon discussion (what the Father says, being labeled as being "negative," not wanted) is already excluded from the outcome. All they have to do is find out, through dialogue what the children ("the people") are dialoguing with themselves about (what they are lusting after or coveting), offer to "help" them "actualize" it and they "own" them. 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you."

Crazy as that might sound, it is true. All forms of Socialism (Local [cult: religious and secular], National, and Global) can not survive while you honor your earthly father's and the Heavenly Father's authority, that is you recognize the Father's authority as being above yourself, the facilitator of 'change' (the Marxist), and "the group" ("the people"). Don't confuse that with Hitler because he used "the group" to initiate and sustain control over "the people." In a free society there is no one between you and the Father. What the "New World Order" has to do (its only agenda) is destroy the "Old World Order," your honoring and obeying the Father instead of following after, serving, defending, protecting, worshiping, praising, and even dying for the facilitator of 'change' and "the group," (replacing individualism, under God, "What will my Father say?" with socialism, "What will the 'group think'?").

The key point here is government is to prevent you from killing people who you disagree with while establishing policy, rules, and law (in order to defend your faith or, if you are "Fatherless," your opinion) and protect you from being killed (by people who disagree with you) for your faith, while recognizing and protecting your (and their) God given right and duty to share your (and their) faith or opinion in the public arena (from where we get freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the conscience). Without this all we have is anarchy, tyranny, rebellion, and revolution (that which socialists, "children of disobedience" love and have to have in order to do what they want without being held accountable for their carnal thoughts [expressed] and their carnal actions as well as not have a guilty conscience, that is have any remorse when they [or others] "remove" anyone who gets in their way, which includes the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous).

The Father's authority is something those of dialectic reasoning (Psychologists, Group-Psychotherapists, Social-Psychologists, Socialists, Marxists, Communists, Globalists, facilitator's of 'change' who are intoxicated with, addicted to, and possessed by "group think" and the money they then have access to ("drug money") by controlling, "helping" "the people" get what they want; "Building relationship upon self interest" (Obama; see picture) is all about the Marxist gaining access to the money ["drug money;" you had better not touch our "drugs" or we will take you out, you will be "suicided," making the NGO's et al. the "drug cartel"]) can not accept. (Sorry for the disjointed sentence - not really - but reading it again will make it clear. I have an agenda. The truth. So sue me. I say that to liberals since they always correct a person's spelling, ect. refusing to listen to what they have to say. I don't mind the correcting, I need it - when I am wrong - but their haughty attitude I hold in contempt.) "Bloom's Taxonomies," (Marxist curriculum, built upon the ideology of the Frankfurt School, a group of Marxists who came to America in the early 30's, advancing Marxism, the praxis if Genesis 3:1-6 through the use of psychology, through the use of dialogue, turning the children against the Father and His authority, with Benjamin Bloom sighting two of its members as the "Taxonomies" political system, its "Weltanschauung," Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno) by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today has but one agenda (outcome), removing the Father's authority from the mind of the children and therefore from society so socialists-Marxists-facilitator's of 'change' can rule without being judged, condemned, and cast out, silencing, censoring, and removing anyone who gets in their way (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) without having a guilty conscience, without having any sense of remorse. They do not mind the parents (citizens) going into debt as long as they have access to and control the credit card. How far into debt are we? After all it is all about money (stored up pleasure, "drug money"). As children, they perceive themselves as being entitled.

When you leave God out of (remove God from) your child's education the devil will take His place. It is a given. An absolute. It is a simple rule: since discussion is of the Father and dialogue is of the world, when dialogue is used to define and establish behavior the Father has to be excluded, that is silenced, censored, and removed. It is not that your father is perfect, he might be a tyrant, MIA, or AWOL, it is that his office is perfect, given to him by God to serve Him in. It is in that office a child develops a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. It is the Father authoring commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed or applied and enforcing them where the child learns that there is right and there is wrong behavior, that he will be held accountable (there is a consequence) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, engendering individualism, under the Father, under God. The heart of the dialectic process is the heart of the child, deceitful and "desperately wicked," deceived in believing life is only about his lusting after pleasure, the child becomes "desperately wicked" toward anyone who gets in pleasure's way. Making pleasure (the child's carnal nature) the drive of life and the augmentation of pleasure the purpose of the socialist is forced to remove the Father from the environment in order for him to do what he wants without having a guilty conscience. When you attend a meeting requiring you to "Be positive and not negative" you are being pressured to leave that which is negative out, the Father so the children can say and do what they want (be positive, be immoral) without fear of being judged, condemned, or cast out, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience. Until you understand this (that it is all about the Father, the removal of Him from the person's mind, affecting his actions when it comes to behavior) you do not KNOW what is happening to you, to the world around you, and to your children (your elected officials; All I have to do is find out what they are dialoguing with themselves about, "help" them actualize it, and I "own" them. They no longer re-present you.).

1 John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." Hebrews 12 "But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby."

The greatest barrier to socialism is your father's and the Heavenly Father's authority, both over "the group." The over six hundred social-psychology books I've read all make this clear. The removal of the Father's authority from your and your children's mind is what contemporary education is all about so they (as facilitators of 'change,' the serpent in the garden) can rule over everyone without restraint. Carl Rogers: "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual comes to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" Being isolated in "the group," now having to either return to the Father, being rejected by "the group" or identifying with "the group," which is affirmed what he wants to do that his father won't let him do . . . [you can figure the rest of that one out, but just in case] "group think" now occupies his mind, affecting (justifying) his actions (against the father). This thing we call dialogue, that we love so much, which makes us god, when loosed from the Father's authority (rejecting discussion, the Father having the final say, requiring faith) results in us searing our conscience, damning our soul, and cursing the nation. This is everything the Marxist, the facilitator of 'change' loves, even "helping" us do it in the name of the Lord, to "grow" "the church."

This is why Charlie Kirk was murdered (assassinated). He was bringing the father's authority (talking the student's into getting married and having a family, learning to be responsible under God, the Heavenly Father's authority, the gospel message) onto campuses with Marxists, facilitators of 'change' having to control the minds of the students, the next generation of citizens so they could sin (be deviant, perverse, degenerate, practice debauchery) with impunity, without having a guilty conscience, with the professors being paid (paid well) without fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out for their immoral thoughts and immoral actions, 'justifying' and promoting the same for their students. This is why the University has now become "party time," a place of immorality (the breeding ground of the NGO's, the "deep state," the "shadow government," the "swamp," the "corperate," receiving its support). All college students are "damaged goods" who have participated in the Marxist (group psychotherapy, "group grade;" a diverse group of students, dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, having to put aside their father's authority in order to do so, in order to do the process, in order to be a part of "the group," in order for "the group" to get a good grade, over personal-social issues, in a facilitated meeting, to a pre-determined outcome that once you have experienced defying your father's authority in order to be a part of "the team," in order to be affirmed by "the group" you can not "unexperience" it) class. This could be said of the grade school and high school classes as well where "What would my Father say?" is replaced with "What will 'the group' think?" aka "Class Consciousness." Jürgen Habermas (a Marxist, member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (a Marxist, founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory; György Lukács, History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

The way it was. Martin Luther: "I greatly fear that the universities, unless they teach the Holy Scriptures diligently and impress them on the young students, are wide gates to hell. I would advise no one to send his child where the Holy Scriptures are not supreme. Every institution that does not unceasingly pursue the study of God's word becomes corrupt." Karl Marx (education in his time and in America, to some extent up until the 40's and 50's): "Education as yet is unable and unwilling to bring all estates and distinctions into its circle. Only Christianity and morality are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." The way it is now. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Karl Marx: "Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former [the Father's authority in the home, in the classroom, in the workplace, in government, even in the church] must then itself be destroyed in theory and in practice [the Father's authority must be removed from the students' mind, directly affecting their actions]." Mao Zedong: "Words and actions should help to unite, and not divide, the people." In other words: leave the Father out (quit telling me how I am to behave) and we can all get along. Vladimir Lenin: "The peasantry [the traditional family] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the Father's authority] - in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions everywhere." By replacing discussion (what the Father says) with dialogue (with what the students want to do) when it comes to defining and establishing behavior accomplishes the deed. We love our dialogue (being god, having people wait on us instead of us doing what the Father says) so much it is hard for us to see what it is doing to us when we turn to it instead of to the Father when it comes to us deciding what we are going to do when it comes to our behavior.

Jesus: John 5:30 "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." Matthew 12:50 "For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven."

OUTLINE:

TRADITIONAL EDUCATION:
(Discussion rules over dialogue, sustaining the Father's authority.)
(Nationalism, Sovereignty, "Rule of Law," Individualism, under God.)

KNOWING = being TOLD.

COMPREHENDING =

Get answers right = good grade.
Get answers wrong = bad grade.

APPLICATION = take test.

ANALYSIS =

Right answer = good grade.
Wrong answer = bad grade.

Go back to KNOWING by being TOLD.

NO SYNTHESIS or EVALUATION (which requires compromise).

OUTCOME = Learn and do what you are TOLD. "Old School"

In traditional education ("Old School") the teacher replicates (reinforces) the Father's authority in the home

The teacher:

1. preaches established commands and rules to be obeyed as given,
2. teaches established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and
3. discusses any question(s) the students might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the teacher's discretion, providing he or she deems it necessary, has time, the children are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority,
4. rewards the students who do right and obey,
5. corrects the student who is wrong
6. chastens the student who does wrong and/or disobeys, that he might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, in order to do the Fathers' will, in order to do what he is told, and
7. casts out (expels/grounds) any student who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, attacks the Father's authority system, which retains the Father's authority system in the students' thoughts, directly affecting their actions.

MARKIST EDUCATION
(Discussion is made subject to dialogue, destroying the Father's authority.)
(Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Globalism.)

"Bloom's Taxonomies"
(Marxist Curriculum)

Begins with the "affective domain," the students feelings (their lust for pleasure and resentment toward authority)

KNOWING = having experienced (resented) being TOLD they could not do what you wanted to do and they had to do what you did not want to do.

Kenneth Benne: "Persons will not come into full partnership in the process until they register dissatisfaction." (Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

Theodor Adorno: "The individual may have 'secret' thoughts which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it. To gain access is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential."

COMPREHENSION = they can share their feelings regarding their parents authority without being judged, condemned, casted out.

APPLICATION = doing it in a group setting,

ANALYSIS = all the students in the class have had the same experience = "Group Think" aka "Class Consciousness."

Jürgen Habermas (a Marxist, member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." Deviancy becomes the "norm."

Irvin D. Yalom: "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established."

SYNTHESIS = the group, compromising to get along replaces the father, doing what you're TOLD.

György Lukács (founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

EVALUATION = from then on the student is concerned about what "the group" might think (rejecting being TOLD).

OUTCOME = Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Globalism = Totalitarianism. Attacking the father's authority for getting in the way. Rejecting Nationalism, Sovereignty, "Rule of Law," Individualism, under God.

No guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, for taking the life of the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous because they get in the way of what you WANT to do. There is no guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning against established commands, rules, facts, and truth in dialogue. In dialogue there is only the person's self interest.

Another way to look at it:

If FATHER = THESIS then the CHILDREN = ANTITHESIS therefore there can be no SYNTHESIS as each child is held personally accountable for his carnal thoughts (expressed) and carnal actions by the Father. Discussion, what the Father says restrains dialogue, what the children want.

But if the CHILD = THESIS then the FATHER = ANTITHESIS and the CHILDREN can find what they have in common, their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint = SYNTHESIS. Dialogue, what the children want negates true discussion, what the Father says, discussion is now made subject to what the children want.

If THESIS = DISCUSSION (with the Father authoring commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed or applied, and enforcing them, with the Father having the final say) then ANTITHESIS = DIALOGUE (the children's feelings and thoughts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating are restrained) and the children remain subject to what the Father says. There is no SYNTHESIS - "group think." György Lukács: The dialectical method was overthrown . . .; the parts were prevented from finding their definition within the whole." (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

But if THESIS = DIALOGUE (the children's feelings and thoughts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating being expressed) then ANTITHESIS = DISCUSSION (the Father's' authoring of commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed or applied, and enforcing them, with the Father having the final say) is rejected and SYNTHESIS is the outcome where DISCUSSION is made subject to DIALOGUE resulting in the children uniting upon what they have in common, their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint (hating the Father's authority for getting in the way). Jürgen Habermas: "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." Norman O. Brown: "By dialectic, I mean an activity of consciousness, struggling to circumvent the limitations imposed by the formal-logical law of contradiction. (Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) Ervin Laszlo: "Bypassing the traditional channels of 'top-down' decision making our objective center's upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common [lust] interests and ultimately to world interests, transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (A Strategy For The Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

That's a very rough skeleton of the difference between the classrooms. It is a Soviet which they have not defined until recently, but the superintendent of California's education system, 1921 warned the state that the students were participating in Soviet education and they were learning to question and challenge authority. That was in California in 1921. Although he started universities, his name is not on any building. Go figure. Will C. Woods: "Has authority been banished in these later days? Has the world reached a point where it will condone the formation of pupil soviets?"

The Soviet.
(The "Group Grade" classroom)

1. a diverse "group" of people (which must include the deviant; "tolerante of ambiguity" aka "intolerant of any influence from without" Karl Marx),

2. dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process; there is only the persons natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint),

3. over personal-social issues (public-private partnership which means your soul is "owned" by the state; you become "human resource"),

4. in a facilitated meeting (it will not work without the serpent in the garden; keeping the negative - "Thou shalt surely die." - out of the room),

5. to a predetermined outcome (that all participants would become "group think" (immoral) and no longer respectful of a father's authority (being moral), rejecting nationalism, sovereignty, inalienable rights, individualism under God, doing what they are TOLD - labeled as being Fascist).

Karl Marx: "Only Christianity and morality are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." (The Holy Family)

I had posted a comment on how "No one is listening," at least that I can not tell (my experience being "Talking into a barrel and not hearing my voice come back") but I know there are a few who are. It is that we are now living in a world that refuses to hear. 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." So I will press on as the Lord leads: knowing and sharing the truth is wonderful but the silence in response is painful. deangotcher@gmail.com.

Discussion And Dialogue Are Two Different Political Systems.

Discussion is the Father telling the children what they can and can not do, having the final say. Dialogue is the children justifying themselves doing what they want to do, having the final say (at least in their mind). Which one you turn to for direction determines your paradigm, the way you feel, think, and act towards your self, towards others, towards the world, and towards authority. In discussion, establishing what the Father says over dialogue, over what you want to do (making dialogue subject to discussion, subject to what the Father says), you humble, deny, die to your self, to your lusts (your wants) in order to do what the Father says, tell others when they are doing wrong what they are doing is wrong according to what your Father said, enduring their rejection in doing so, not participating in the world around you (in the world but not of it) when it is doing wrong, enduring its rejection of you as well, respecting and honour the earthly father's authority even when he is doing wrong (not doing it with him, enduring the results), leaving the final judgment in God, the Heavenly Father's and His Son's hands. Dialogue, when established over discussion (making discussion subject to dialogue, to what you want to do) is on the other hand doing what you want to do, joining with others doing the same, rejecting the Father's authority for getting in the way of your lusts, silencing, censoring, removing Him and anyone loyal to Him with no fear of being judged, condemned, or cast out in order to remove anyone who gets in the way of your lust, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous without having a guilty conscience. Discussion is with the Father (with the one above), with the Father having the final say (making you subject to the laws of nature, dealing with your body and the Law of God, dealing with your soul, both of which are absolute: the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, with no shadow of turning, and not a respecter of persons) while dialogue is with your self and the world (the many below), with you (at least in your mind) having the final say (making you subject to the law of the flesh and the world that stimulates it, making you subject to constant 'change').
Discussion: With discussion you do what you are "told," with the Father having the final say. Bohm and Peat: "In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Science, Order, and Creativity) Beware, Bohm makes discussion subject to dialogue making it a "relatively fixed position" instead of absolute, making the one holding it the one doing the "arguing" and it as being their "point of view" instead of the one they are under postion, making discussion subject to the 'change' process, negating God, the Father in the process.
Dialogue: With dialogue you do what you "want," with you having the final say. Bohm and Peat: "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Science, Order, and Creativity)
All of man's wisdom begins with dialogue. Only God's Word begins with discussion (with man dying to dialogue, dying to doing what he wants, which includes dying to the praises of men when it comes to behavior in order to do God, the Father, and His Son, Jesus Christ's will; the preaching of "the cross," dying to your self, your flesh and the world that stimulates it is "foolishness to the world"). Wilfred Bion (a Marxist): ". . . prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (A Memoir of the Future; you have to silence, censor, and cast out discussion, what the Father says, that which is "negative" in a room full of dialogue, subject to "self interest," to that which is "of the world," to that which is "positive") When you replace discussion (what the Father says) with dialogue (with what you want) when it comes to behavior (making discussion, right and wrong subject to dialogue, subject to the flesh, making right anyone who makes you "feel" good and wrong anyone who makes you feel "bad") you do that which is "of the world," that which comes naturally, establish your self, your lusts over and therefore you against the Father and His authority, resulting in you doing your will instead of the Father's. While discussion can not save you (your earthly father can not save you, not being perfect) without it you can not be saved (admit you are wrong, repent before God, and be saved). With dialogue you can not be saved since in dialogue you are God (a god amongst gods), not needing salvation (other than from God, the Father, from who is getting in the way of what you want aka dialogue). How can you deny your self, your lusts, your carnal nature, endure the rejection of "the group" for not 'justifying' its lusts, follow the Lord Jesus Christ, by the power of the Holy Spirit doing the Father's will and 'praxis' Genesis 3:1-6 ("Bloom's Taxonomies,"), doing what the Serpent (the master facilitator of 'change,' the master group psycho-therapist, the master social-psychologist) did to the woman in the garden in Eden (psychology; Sigmund Freud), with Adam following (socialism; Karl Marx) denying the Father, doing your will, "actualizing" your lusts, your "self interests" instead? If you make behavior subject to dialogue (to the carnal nature of man) your name can not be written in the Lamb's book of life since in dialogue you are "God," 'good' in your eyes and in the eyes of others, therefore there is no need for repentance, other than for believing in God, the Father. Finding your identity in your "self" and in "the group" ("group think"), which dialogue does, accomplishes the deed. Carl Rogers: "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual comes to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy) Irvin D. Yalom: "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." (The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy) What are those norms? We can talk about what we want to do, what we are lusting after without fear of being judged, condemned, cast out for our carnal thoughts and carnal actions, silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in the way of what we want (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) without having a guilty conscience, with one anothers affirmation, with impunity. Labeling as 'prejudice' all that is not of human nature, of man's carnal nature, that inhibits or blocks man from doing what he wants, preventing him from having or doing what he is lusting after, unrighteousness becomes the norm and righteosness (and the righteous) the enemy. Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" We do not control ("own") what we are lusting after. It is lust that controls ("owns") us when we submit (yield) to it.

TRADITIONAL EDUCATION is based upon discussion (when it comes to defining and establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior), with the parents hiring and firing teachers based upon the parents paradigm, with the parents having the final say, resulting in the teacher: 1. preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, 2. teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is and applied, 3. discussing with their students any questions the students might have regarding the facts and truth being taught, at the teachers descretion, whether the teacher has time, the students can understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking the teacher's authority, 4. rewarding and encouraging the students who get and do things right, 5. correcting the students who get things wrong, 6. chastening the student who does wrong, and 7. casting out (grouding or expelling) the student who questions, challenges, defys, disregards, attacks the teacher and-or his or her authority. In traditional education the teacher with twenty students has twenty soverign nations, each student subject to his or her parents authority. The duty of the teacher is to teach established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Any questions regarding what and how to teach is discussed with the parents, with the parents having the final say. Testing is designed by the teacher with parents knowing the source, having the final say. Only then can the parents retain control over the curriculum that is being used in the classroom. Curriculum is a political system.

MARKIST EDUCATION is based upon dialogue (when it comes to defining and establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior) with 1. a diverse group of students (deviating from one another because of their parents commands, rules, facts, and truth) 2. dialoguing, 3. their opinion, 4. to a consensus, 5 over personal-social issues, 6. in a facilitated meeting, 7. to a pre-determined outcome that "What will the 'group think?'" now occupies the students minds instead of "What would my parents want me to do?" There is no Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the students carnal desires being shared and 'justified.' The students are 'liberated' from their parent's authority in dialogue, become 'equal' with one another in their right of opinion, and become 'at-one-with-one-another' in their lusting after pleasure and their resentment toward restraint, hating missing out on pleasure because they have to do what their parent says, united in questioning, challenging, disobeying, defying, disregarding, attacking their parents and their parents authority as a result of their classroom experience, having participated in a Marxist curriculum (political system) becoming a Marxist - hating authority; "You can't tell me what I can or can not do or say?" Every teacher is certified and school accredited today based upon their use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," (Marxist curriculum) in the classroom. Even "Christian." Every student's conscience is sears and soul is damned, and the nation is cursed as the result of the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" (Marxist curriculum) in the classroom.

If we contrast traditional education with Marxist education using the steps of "Bloom's Taxonomies" from Knowing, Comprehending, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluaton (I know it is the old labels) we find in traditional education, Knowing is the Father telling you what is the right and what is the wrong answer to a question, Comprehending is the understanding you will get a bad grade if you get the question wrong, in Application, if you get the question wrong your Analysis is you now KNOW you need to do what you are told as you are taken to "the woodshed," as you get a bad grade for getting the question wrong. There is no Synthesis or Evaluation in traditional education as there is no compromise accepted, there is no approve of the child getting the question wrong. In Marxist education, Knowing is the students having experienced ("sense experienced") being told they could not do something they wanted to do or they were told to do something they did not want to do and resented it, Comprehension being they can share their resentments (against being told what they can and can not do) without being judged, condemned, cast out, with Application being their sharing with one another their common experiences of resentment, with the Analysis being they can do what they want without fear of being judged, condemned, cast out, that their resentment was normal, creating Synthesis, unity (affirmation or consensus aka with feelings) with one another "class consciousness," "group think" based upon their natural inclination to lust after pleasure ("What can I get out of this situation, object, people, or person for my self?" and for "the group") and resent restraint (toward missing out on what they want and "the group" wants, them and "the group" now having become one), thus Evaluating the environment which they find themselves and using the Marxist process to bring others to the same outcome, the liberation of children from the Father's authority system, silencing, censoring, removing (killing) anyone who refuses to participate (who get in the way of "progress," what they want).

Discussion And Dialogue Are Two Different Political Systems.
They can not occupy the same space at the same time.
One must rule over the other.
We have both.
Doing what we are told or doing what we want.
Which one we choose when it comes to behavior rules over our lives.
We can not dialogue (do what we want) without removing (denying) the Father (doing what we are told).
We can not get off of dialogue (doing what we want) without being chastened by the Father (doing what we are told).
Either the parents' rule or the children.
The conscience or the "super-ego."
God (the Father) or the Serpent (the master facilitator of 'change').
Discussion or Dialogue.
Which one you turn to for direction determines the outcome.

What every student should KNOW before heading off to college (or the University, Vo-tech, or the Work environment) and what every parent should KNOW before sending their child off to the classroom:

Discussion is of the Father, being told by the Father what is right behavior and what is wrong, with the Father having the final say (while the earthly father is not perfect, using the office he occupies for his own self, the office is perfect, given to him by God to serve Him in). Dialogue is of the world, how the child feels and what the child thinks, with his behavior being influenced by the world or by "the group," with the "the group" having the final say (at least in the child's mind). Which one your child turns to (as promoted by the teacher in the classroom) in order to define and establish behavior determines your child's paradigm (or political system); the way your child feels, thinks, and acts toward his or her self, toward others, toward the world, and toward authority.

Discussion: "In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

Dialogue: "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

You have to "suspend" the Father's authority in order to "build relationship with others on common self interest." This is the hallmark of Marxism.

Obama: "Relationship built upon self interest." (What Obama taught in the Law school in Chicago)

Jürgen Habermas: "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence."

György Lukács: "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

In discussion your child is an individual in a group (retaining the Father's authority, what you have taught him or her regarding what is right behavior and what is wrong). This is reflected in "individualism, under God." In dialogue, on the other hand "the group" is in your child's mind, which requires removal ("suspention") of the Father's authority system or paradigm (your authority) from his or her thoughts in order for your child to become at-one-with "the group," with the facilitator of 'change's' (the serpent's) "help." Affirmation by "the group." now being more important than what you say, your authority has been "washed" from your child's brain. We can only serve one or the other, the Father (discussion) or "the group" (dialogue) when it comes to defining and establishing behavior. Which one you put first determines the outcome. Capitalism is based upon discussion, doing what the parent, the teacher, the boss, the law, God says while socialism is based upon dialogue, doing what "the group" says. While with man, born of the flesh dialogue is always present, with God, who is spirit it is not. Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin ["the group," dialogue] unto death, or of obedience [the Father, discussion] unto righteousness?"

God is God in discussion. Man is God in dialogue. This is why those "of and for the world" always 'reason' through dialogue (that is from the flesh) while defining and establishing what is right behavior and what is wrong.

The Formula:

Marxism (Satanism) is the praxis of a diverse group of people dialoguing their opinions to a consensus over personal - social issues, defining and establishing behavior according to their carnal nature, their lust for pleasure and their resentment toward restraint, in a facilitated meeting to a pre-determined outcome that no one will think and act without having "the group" ("What will 'the group' think?") in their mind in order for them to do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience, with "the group's" affirmation; with impunity.

All teachers are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies," as their curriculum (political system) in the classroom. A Marxist political system. The so called taxonomies (Bloom admitted fourty years after the publication of the first taxonomy that it "was unproved at the time it was developed and may well be 'unprovable.'" Forty Year Evaluation) base 'reasoning' upon Genesis 3:1-6, using dialogue (as the master facilitator of 'change' did with the woman in the garden in Eden, with Adam following) to 'liberate' the student's from parental authority. Rejecting the Heavenly Father's authority Marxist's perceive the earthly father as the source for belief in the Heavenly Father's authority. Thus their agenda is to remove the earthly father's authority from the face of the earth; from the classroom, from the home, from the workplace, from government, even from the "church." When it comes to defining and establishing behavior, when you replace discussion, Hebrews 12:5-11, where the Father has the final say (chastening you, holding you accountable when you do wrong , disobey, sin) with dialogue, Genesis 3:1-6 (where you 'justifying' your self, your lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, reject the Father's authority, that is reject accountability for your carnal thoughts and carnal actions) you accomplish the deed.

In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process (Marxism) there is no Father's authority. There is only the child's carnal nature (man's lust for pleasure and hatred toward the restrainer) being 'justified.' Luke 16:15 "And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."