authorityresearch.com

Proverbs 3:5, 6 "Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths."

2026 RADIO - Sort Of
(Audios with Notes by Dean Gotcher)
See Sources, Presentation Notes, and some of the over 600 social-psychology books I have read researching the dialectic process.
University Class On Marxism And The Dialectic Process.
deangotcher@gmail.com

Go directly to Radio shows and notes.

When you remove the Father's authority, "the field of force of an adult," the fear of God, accountability for one's actions from the child's life (from his or her thoughts ) all you have is a Marxist lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, hating anyone who gets in the way, removing them without having a guilty conscience. LUST engenders HATE, which then 'justifies' VIOLANCE. It is an absolute. It is the dialectic process (psychology), where dialogue (what the child WANTS) establishes right and wrong behavior instead of discussion (what the Father says). It is the law of the land today, where the law of the flesh rules without the Law of God getting in the way. György Lukács (a Marxist, the founder of the Frankfurt School which we are now under the influence of): "... the central problem is to change reality. . . . reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?) "Bloom's Taxonomies," by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today (including Christian) are founded upon the Marxist ideology of the "Frankfurt School," merging Karl Marx, "the group" and Sigmund Freud, the individual, both of whom hated the Father's authority. Benjamin Bloom noted that his "taxonomies" are the "Weltanschauung" (political system) of two Marxists, Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno. Both were members of the "Frankfurt School." "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." Laws which come through discussion ("What does my Father want me to do?") retain the Father's authority. Laws which come through dialogue ("What can I or WE get out of this situation, these people, this person, this office for MY or OUR self?") eradicate the Father's authority. Who turns to the Father for direction when what He says gets in the way of what they WANT? Only the believer in the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ.

When you tolerate unrighteousness, unrighteousness becomes the norm. KNOWING by being TOLD plus the "field of force of an adult" equals having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Doing what you are TOLD equals "What would my parents want me to do?" equals individualism, under God aka unalienable rights. Making dialogue, what you want subject to discussion, to what the Father says keeps the Father in authority, with the Father establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior, holding you accountable for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, with the Father having the final say. Knowing by "sense experience" plus affirmation from others aka by "the group" equals no guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Doing what you want instead of what you are TOLD, with the group's affirmation equals "What will the 'group think?'" aka "group think" or "class consciousness" aka socialism aka human rights. Making discussion, what the Father says subject to dialogue, to what you want, eradicates the Father's authority when it comes to defining and establishing behavior resulting in you being able to do wrong, disobey, sin without fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out, removing anyone who gets in your way (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) without having a guilty conscience. It is an absolute, which those of and for the world know and do not want you to know.

If you do not start with, go through, and end with the Word of God you know nothing. Without it you do not KNOW. Wilfred Bion (a Marxist): ". . . prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (A Memoir of the Future) Apart from the Father and His Son Jesus Christ all we have is "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," only that which is "of the world." 1 John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." Erich Fromm (a Marxist; a member of the Frankfurt School): "In the process of history man gives birth to himself. He becomes what he potentially is, and he attains what the serpent - the symbol of wisdom and rebellion - promised, and what the patriarchal, jealous God of Adam did not wish: that man would become like God himself." (You shall be as gods: A radical interpretation of the old testament and its tradition) Stephen Bronner: "In fact, it is probably fair to say that Erich Fromm's Marx's Concept of Man introduced the young Marx to America and provided the dominant interpretation of this thinker [Marxism] for the students of the New Left [the Democratic Party]." "Fromm gave the humanitarian, idealist, and romantic proponents of the New Left a Marx they could love." (Of Critical Theory and its Theorists) Both Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud hated the FATHER'S authority, the father ruling over man (over "the group" aka over society) and over the children (in the home) preventing them from becoming themselves, thinking and acting according to their carnal nature and sought to destroy the FATHER and his authority that got in the way. "Bloom's Taxonomies" (by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today, including christian) were built upon Karl Marx's and Sigmund Freud's ideology which were merged and promoted by the "Frankfurt School." Our framing Fathers did not get rid of the King. They made your father King, ruling over his home, his property, his business according to his convictions which (according to the Marxist Kurt Lewin) creates the guilty conscience, a civil society. By coming between the parents and their children (and between the parents themselves) through dialogue getting them to express their lusts and their dissatisfaction with having to do what they are told the father's authority is "washed' from the brain - doing it in the group with "the group" 'justifying' the individual's lusts "the group" takes the father's place - what happened in the garden in Eden. Norman O. Brown (a Marxist explaining Sigmund Freud, the purpose of psychology): "To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" Carl Rogers: "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." Jürgen Habermas (a member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (the founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." Jürgen Habermas "The revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life, which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents]." Irvin D. Yalom: "Freud noted that patricide and incest are part of man's deepest nature." "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." (The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

In a nutshell it is all about the father's authority in the home - how to destroy it in the thoughts and actions of the children (the next generation of citizens). He is perceived as the source for the belief in God, who judges and condemns man's carnal nature, casting man out for doing what comes natural, lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. By replacing discussion (where the father authors commands, rules, facts, and truth to be obeyed and applied, having the final say) with dialogue (where children do what they want, having the final say, at least in their mind) when it comes to defining and establishing behavior the father's authority (both on the earth and in Heaven) are negated since there is no father's authority in dialogue, there is only the child's desire to enjoy the carnal pleasures (lusts) of the 'moment' that the world stimulates trying to figure out how to get around or remove any barrior. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Herbert Marcuse, a Marxist explaining psychology, the political system of Sigmund Freud: "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression - a 'barrier to incest,' . . . the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same." (Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud) Norman O. Brown: "Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." (Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) Benjamin Bloom: "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." Benjamin Bloom cited two Marxists (members of the Frankfurt School) as the "Taxonomies" political system, its "Weltanschauung," Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno).

What Is A Facilitator of 'Change'?

"Bill of Rights" (Unalianable rights) => Your Father (supported by traditional education) as King (telling those under his authority when it comes to behavior what they can and can not do, with him if there are any questions, through discussion having the final say; "Rule of Law") ruling over his family, his property, his business according to his convictions "What does our Father want us to do?" engendering a guilty conscience for doing wrong or disobeying in all who are under his authority, creating a civil society (Constitutional Republic).

VS

"Bloom's Taxonomies" (Marxist curriculum; Humanist rights) => Facilitators of 'Change' as the serpent did in the garden in Eden coming between the children and the Father, through dialogue ("What I or WE want to do?") when it comes to defining and establishing behavior liberating the children from the Father's authority in order for them to do what they want without restraint "You can't tell us what we can or can not do," engendering rebellion, anarchy, and revolution, "owning" the children => the breeding ground of the deep state, the swamp, the shadow government, the military, medical, legislative, educational, etc. establishments (the drug cartel), searing the conscience, damning the soul of all who participate, cursing (destroying) the nation (Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Globalism aka "Group Think"). No one will stop it because everyone wants to do what they want to do without restraint. Once you open Pandora's box you can't close it, once you light the fire you can't put it out. Proverbs 16:25 "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Luke 11:35 "Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Beware that the light (enlightenment) within thee ("What can I get out of this situation, this object, these people, this person, this office for my self, to feed my lusts?") is not darkness (the pathway to Hell). Martin Luther (The founder of the Protestant Reformation): "I greatly fear that the universities, unless they teach the Holy Scriptures diligently and impress them on the young students, are wide gates to hell. I would advise no one to send his child where the Holy Scriptures are not supreme. Every institution that does not unceasingly pursue the study of God's word becomes corrupt." "Miserable Christians, whose words and faith still depend on the interpretations of men and who expect clarification from them! This is frivolous and ungodly. The Scriptures are common to all, and are clear enough in respect to what is necessary for salvation and are also obscure enough for inquiring minds . . . let us reject the word of man." Max Horkheimer (a Marxist, along with György Lukács who founded the "Frankfurt School," a group of Marxists who came to the States in the early thirties advancing Marxism from the Federal level down through the use of psychology, through the use of dialogue ("What can I or WE get out of this situation, this object, these people, this person, this office for MY or OUR self?") when it comes to defining and establishing behavior, turning the children against the Father and His authority): "Protestantism [individualism, under God] was the strongest force in the extension of cold rational individualism."

Three Paradigms: Patriarch - Matriarch - Heresiarch. Which one are you?

A very lengthy overview. (Quotations and Verses.) Not for the faint hearted (the word 'endure' has meaning here) making it clear where all this is coming from and where it is taking us. If you 'endure' to the end you will clearly KNOW what is happening and what you need to do.

Introduction

Discussion: 1) doing right and not wrong according to what you have been told, 2) being held accountable for doing wrong which engenders a guilty conscience, 3) with the one in authority having the final say. Dialogue: 1) lusting after pleasure and hating restraint 2) silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in you way without having a guilty conscience, 3) with you having the final say (at least in your mind). For individualism (under God), Sovereignty, Nationalism; rule of law. What to look for in the classroom: discussion + individuals + teacher. For Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Globalism; rebellion and revolution. what to look for in the classroom: dialogue + group + facilitator.

In 1922 the First Marxist Work Week (Erste Marxistische Arbeitswoche), headed by György Lukács took place in Thuringia, Germany. They met on how, through the use of psychology (dialogue) to advance Marxism around the world. Working under the title the Institute for Social Research they continued their research in Frankfurt, Germany, thus gaining the title the "Frankfurt School." Most of its members came to America in the early 30's. Their praxis of merging Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud (Marxism and psychology), "the group" and the individual, replacing individualism, under God with "the group" is now being put into praxis through the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom. It is an attack upon the father's authority in the home. Through the use of dialogue (Sigmund Freud) and "the group" (Karl Marx) the father's authority is eradicates ("washed") from the child's mind (and therefore from the child's actions, resulting in the child doing what he wants instead of what he is told, concerned about what "the group" might think instead of the Father). Through the merging of dialogue and the "group grade" classroom, with the aid of a facilitator of 'change' (you need the serpent in the garden, the master facilitator of 'change,' the master group psychotherapist, the master social psychologist to make it work) the deed is done. The Frankfurt School's formula for bringing America (and the rest of the world) under Marxist (Globalist) control is: a diverse group of people (incorporating the deviant), dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (having to put aside their father's authority in order to be a part of "the group," ["group dynamics" Kurt Lewin, an editor of the Frankfurt School's magazine; Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, Journal for Social Research] in order for "the group" to get a good grade or to advance), over personal-social issues, in a facilitated meeting, to a pre-determined outcome that once you have experienced defying your father's authority in order to be a part of "the group" you can not "unexperience" having replaced what the father says, the father's authority with what the "group thinks," aka "Class Consciousness." Dialogue ties you to the many below, to what you and everyone else has in common, your and their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and resent restraint. Discussion ties you to the one (the parents, the teacher, the boss, the leader, God) above, telling you what to do, holding you accountable if you do wrong, disobey, sin (if you lust after pleasure instead of doing what you are told). Irvin D. Yalom (a Marxist, advancing the ideology of the Frankfurt School): "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." "There is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance." "few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity; and the individual rejects critical feelings toward the group at this time to avoid a state of cognitive dissonance. To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance. Long cherished but self-defeating beliefs and attitudes may waver and decompose in the face of a dissenting majority." Kurt Lewin: "The group to which an individual belongs is the ground for his perceptions, his feelings, and his actions." "It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." "The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." "Change in methods of leadership [I add, replacing the father, "can not," "thou shalt surely die" with the facilitator of 'change,' "can" "Ye shalt not surely die"] is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." Karl Marx: "Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former [your father's authority] must then itself be destroyed [eradicated] in theory and in practice [it must be "washed" from your mind, directly affecting your actions]." Herbert Marcuse (explaining Sigmund Freud's history): "the hatred against patriarchal suppression" "a 'barrier to incest,'" "the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." Carl Rogers: "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." Martin Jay: "As the Frankfurt School wrestled with how to 'reinvigorate Marx,' they 'found the missing link in Freud [psychology].'" Dialogue (Sigmund Freud, psychology) + "the Group" (Karl Marx, Marxism), when it comes to defining and establishing behavior = Marxism (Father consciousness is replaced with Class Consciousness or Group Think). Abraham Maslow: "Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [eradication of the Father's authority] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [the Father's authority] stunt human nature."

The use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," (Marxist curriculum) in the classroom converts students into Marxists. Benjamin Bloom: "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." Benjamin Bloom cited two Marxists (members of the Frankfurt School) as the "Taxonomies" political system, its "Weltanschauung," Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno). Jürgen Habermas (a member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (the founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." Jürgen Habermas "The revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life, which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents]." "Building relationship upon self interest [lust, which leads to hate, which leads to violence]." is Marxism. (Obama, see picture) It is all about the money ("drug money"), moving it out from under the parents control through the GO's and NGO's (the corporate's) to the elected officials; the NGO's are the offshore banks for the elected officials, so they have access to their "drug money," their reward for passing laws to fund the GO's and NGO's (and pay them well) at the taxpayers (the father's) expense. The facilitated, dialoguing opinions to a consensus, "group grade" classroom is the breeding ground of Marxism, searing the conscience, damning the soul, cursing the nation. The guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning is created by the father's authority in the home, by the "induced field of force of an adult." Discussion therefore (where the Father has the final say) engenders the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Bohm and Peat: "In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Science, Order, and Creativity) Kurt Lewin (explaining how the guilty conscience is created and how to negate it): "The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." Dialogue, when it comes to defining and establishing behavior, eradicates the father's authority and therefore the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. Bohm and Peat: "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Science, Order, and Creativity) You "suspend," get rid of the father's authority when you build relationships with others through dialogue, upon "self interest." Dialogue is the language of the Karl Marx in your heart, when it comes to behavior just waiting for the facilitator of 'change' and "the group" to affirm it. Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" You can not see your heart as being wicked, "desperately wicked" because your lust for pleasure, the Karl Marx in you is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Luke 16:15 "And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." The dialectic process is the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6 (self 'justification'), negating Hebrews 12:5-11 (the Father's authority), negating Romans 7:14-25 (the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning) so all can sin with impunity, with no fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out. 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein."

Explaining the dialectic process, used to define and establish behavior, replacing the earthly father's authority in the home and the Heavenly Father's authority above man (the key word being discussion, where the children and men are told what they can and can not do with the Father having the final say; you KNOW because you have been told) with the children's feelings (the key word being dialogue, where the children can do what they want, with them having the final say - at least in their mind). When you understand the difference between the two, discussion (the Father) and dialogue (the children) (the bourgeoisie and the proletariat) you understand what is happening to you and the world around you when one form of communication is used when it comes to defining and establishing behavior rather than the other. Discussion and dialogue are two different political systems. Which one you start with determines the outcome. Those "of and for the world" seek to, as Wilfred Bion stated it "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space [prevent what the Father says from being in the thoughts of the child, affecting the child's actions]." Since money (to the child, including those in adult bodies is stored of pleasure or "drug money") is involved, when the Father controls it the child has to do what the Father says (be moral) in order to gain access to it (be paid) while those "of and for the world" (Marxists) want to gain access to and control the money in order to do what they want (play in the field of immorality and get paid, paid well) without restraint (with "the people's" affirmation - if you do not affirm them or get in their way you will be labeled, silenced, censored, and removed). You are already being labeled, silenced, censored, and removed (in the mind of the participants) when, in the meeting or classroom you are told to "be positive and not negative." Anyone insisting upon discussion (what the Father says, being labeled as being "negative," not wanted) is already excluded from the outcome. All they have to do is find out, through dialogue what the children ("the people") are dialoguing with themselves about (what they are lusting after or coveting), offer to "help" them "actualize" it and they "own" them. 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you."

Crazy as that might sound, it is true. All forms of Socialism (Local [cult: religious and secular], National, and Global) can not survive while you honor your earthly father's and the Heavenly Father's authority, that is you recognize the Father's authority as being above yourself, the facilitator of 'change' (the Marxist), and "the group" ("the people"). Don't confuse that with Hitler because he used "the group" to initiate and sustain control over "the people." In a free society there is no one between you and the Father. What the "New World Order" has to do (its only agenda) is destroy the "Old World Order," your honoring and obeying the Father instead of following after, serving, defending, protecting, worshiping, praising, and even dying for the facilitator of 'change' and "the group," (replacing individualism, under God, "What will my Father say?" with socialism, "What will the 'group think'?").

The key point here is government is to prevent you from killing people who you disagree with while establishing policy, rules, and law (in order to defend your faith or, if you are "Fatherless," your opinion) and protect you from being killed (by people who disagree with you) for your faith, while recognizing and protecting your (and their) God given right and duty to share your (and their) faith or opinion in the public arena (from where we get freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the conscience). Without this all we have is anarchy, tyranny, rebellion, and revolution (that which socialists, "children of disobedience" love and have to have in order to do what they want without being held accountable for their carnal thoughts [expressed] and their carnal actions as well as not have a guilty conscience, that is have any remorse when they [or others] "remove" anyone who gets in their way, which includes the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous).

The Father's authority is something those of dialectic reasoning (Psychologists, Group-Psychotherapists, Social-Psychologists, Socialists, Marxists, Communists, Globalists, facilitator's of 'change' who are intoxicated with, addicted to, and possessed by "group think" and the money they then have access to ("drug money") by controlling, "helping" "the people" get what they want; "Building relationship upon self interest" (Obama; see picture) is all about the Marxist gaining access to the money ["drug money;" you had better not touch our "drugs" or we will take you out, you will be "suicided," making the NGO's et al. the "drug cartel"]) can not accept. (Sorry for the disjointed sentence - not really - but reading it again will make it clear. I have an agenda. The truth. So sue me. I say that to liberals since they always correct a person's spelling, ect. refusing to listen to what they have to say. I don't mind the correcting, I need it - when I am wrong - but their haughty attitude I hold in contempt.) "Bloom's Taxonomies," (Marxist curriculum, built upon the ideology of the Frankfurt School, a group of Marxists who came to America in the early 30's, advancing Marxism, the praxis if Genesis 3:1-6 through the use of psychology, through the use of dialogue, turning the children against the Father and His authority, with Benjamin Bloom sighting two of its members as the "Taxonomies" political system, its "Weltanschauung," Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno) by which all teachers are certified and schools accredited today has but one agenda (outcome), removing the Father's authority from the mind of the children and therefore from society so socialists-Marxists-facilitator's of 'change' can rule without being judged, condemned, and cast out, silencing, censoring, and removing anyone who gets in their way (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) without having a guilty conscience, without having any sense of remorse. They do not mind the parents (citizens) going into debt as long as they have access to and control the credit card. How far into debt are we? After all it is all about money (stored up pleasure, "drug money"). As children, they perceive themselves as being entitled.

When you leave God out of (remove God from) your child's education the devil will take His place. It is a given. An absolute. It is a simple rule: since discussion is of the Father and dialogue is of the world, when dialogue is used to define and establish behavior the Father has to be excluded, that is silenced, censored, and removed. It is not that your father is perfect, he might be a tyrant, MIA, or AWOL, it is that his office is perfect, given to him by God to serve Him in. It is in that office a child develops a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. It is the Father authoring commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed or applied and enforcing them where the child learns that there is right and there is wrong behavior, that he will be held accountable (there is a consequence) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, engendering individualism, under the Father, under God. The heart of the dialectic process is the heart of the child, deceitful and "desperately wicked," deceived in believing life is only about his lusting after pleasure, the child becomes "desperately wicked" toward anyone who gets in pleasure's way. Making pleasure (the child's carnal nature) the drive of life and the augmentation of pleasure the purpose of the socialist is forced to remove the Father from the environment in order for him to do what he wants without having a guilty conscience. When you attend a meeting requiring you to "Be positive and not negative" you are being pressured to leave that which is negative out, the Father so the children can say and do what they want (be positive, be immoral) without fear of being judged, condemned, or cast out, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience. Until you understand this (that it is all about the Father, the removal of Him from the person's mind, affecting his actions when it comes to behavior) you do not KNOW what is happening to you, to the world around you, and to your children (your elected officials; All I have to do is find out what they are dialoguing with themselves about, "help" them actualize it, and I "own" them. They no longer re-present you.).

1 John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." Hebrews 12 "But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby."

The greatest barrier to socialism is your father's and the Heavenly Father's authority, both over "the group." The over six hundred social-psychology books I've read all make this clear. The removal of the Father's authority from your and your children's mind is what contemporary education is all about so they (as facilitators of 'change,' the serpent in the garden) can rule over everyone without restraint. Carl Rogers: "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual comes to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" Being isolated in "the group," now having to either return to the Father, being rejected by "the group" or identifying with "the group," which is affirmed what he wants to do that his father won't let him do . . . [you can figure the rest of that one out, but just in case] "group think" now occupies his mind, affecting (justifying) his actions (against the father). This thing we call dialogue, that we love so much, which makes us god, when loosed from the Father's authority (rejecting discussion, the Father having the final say, requiring faith) results in us searing our conscience, damning our soul, and cursing the nation. This is everything the Marxist, the facilitator of 'change' loves, even "helping" us do it in the name of the Lord, to "grow" "the church."

This is why Charlie Kirk was murdered (assassinated). He was bringing the father's authority (talking the student's into getting married and having a family, learning to be responsible under God, the Heavenly Father's authority, the gospel message) onto campuses with Marxists, facilitators of 'change' having to control the minds of the students, the next generation of citizens so they could sin (be deviant, perverse, degenerate, practice debauchery) with impunity, without having a guilty conscience, with the proffessors being paid (paid well) without fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out for their immoral thoughts and immoral actions, 'justifying' and promoting the same for their students. This is why the University has now become "party time," a place of immorality (the breeding ground of the NGO's, the "deep state," the "shadow government," the "swamp," the "corperate," receiving its support). All college students are "damaged goods" who have participated in the Marxist (group psychotherapy, "group grade;" a diverse group of students, dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, having to put aside their father's authority in order to do so, in order to do the process, in order to be a part of "the group," in order for "the group" to get a good grade, over personal-social issues, in a facilitated meeting, to a pre-determined outcome that once you have experienced defying your father's authority in order to be a part of "the team," in order to be affirmed by "the group" you can not "unexperience" it) class. This could be said of the grade school and high school classes as well where "What would my Father say?" is replaced with "What will 'the group' think?" aka "Class Consciousness." Jürgen Habermas (a Marxist, member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (a Marxist, founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory; György Lukács, History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

The way it was. Martin Luther: "I greatly fear that the universities, unless they teach the Holy Scriptures diligently and impress them on the young students, are wide gates to hell. I would advise no one to send his child where the Holy Scriptures are not supreme. Every institution that does not unceasingly pursue the study of God's word becomes corrupt." Karl Marx (education in his time and in America, to some extent up until the 40's and 50's): "Education as yet is unable and unwilling to bring all estates and distinctions into its circle. Only Christianity and morality are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." The way it is now. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Karl Marx: "Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former [the Father's authority in the home, in the classroom, in the workplace, in government, even in the church] must then itself be destroyed in theory and in practice [the Father's authority must be removed from the students' mind, directly affecting their actions]." Mao Zedong: "Words and actions should help to unite, and not divide, the people." In other words: leave the Father out (quit telling me how I am to behave) and we can all get along. Vladimir Lenin: "The peasantry [the traditional family] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the Father's authority] - in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions everywhere." By replacing discussion (what the Father says) with dialogue (with what the students want to do) when it comes to defining and establishing behavior accomplishes the deed. We love our dialogue (being god, having people wait on us instead of us doing what the Father says) so much it is hard for us to see what it is doing to us when we turn to it instead of to the Father when it comes to us deciding what we are going to do when it comes to our behavior.

Jesus: John 5:30 "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." Matthew 12:50 "For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven."

OUTLINE:

TRADITIONAL EDUCATION:
(Discussion rules over dialogue, sustaining the Father's authority.)
(Nationalism, Sovereignty, "Rule of Law," Individualism, under God.)

KNOWING = being TOLD.

COMPREHENDING =

Get answers right = good grade.
Get answers wrong = bad grade.

APPLICATION = take test.

ANALYSIS =

Right answer = good grade.
Wrong answer = bad grade.

Go back to KNOWING by being TOLD.

NO SYNTHESIS or EVALUATION (which requires compromise).

OUTCOME = Learn and do what you are TOLD. "Old School"

In traditional education ("Old School") the teacher replicates (reinforces) the Father's authority in the home

The teacher:

1. preaches established commands and rules to be obeyed as given,
2. teaches established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and
3. discusses any question(s) the students might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the teacher's discretion, providing he or she deems it necessary, has time, the children are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority,
4. rewards the students who do right and obey,
5. corrects the student who is wrong
6. chastens the student who does wrong and/or disobeys, that he might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, in order to do the Fathers' will, in order to do what he is told, and
7. casts out (expels/grounds) any student who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, attacks the Father's authority system, which retains the Father's authority system in the students' thoughts, directly affecting their actions.

TRANSFORMATIONAL EDUCATION
(Discussion is made subject to dialogue, destroying the Father's authority.)
(Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Globalism.)

"Bloom's Taxonomies"
(Marxist Curriculum)

Begins with the "affective domain," the students feelings (their lust for pleasure and resentment toward authority)

KNOWING = having experienced (resented) being TOLD they could not do what you wanted to do and they had to do what you did not want to do.

Kenneth Benne: "Persons will not come into full partnership in the process until they register dissatisfaction." (Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

Theodor Adorno: "The individual may have 'secret' thoughts which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it. To gain access is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential."

COMPREHENSION = they can share their feelings regarding their parents authority without being judged, condemned, casted out.

APPLICATION = doing it in a group setting,

ANALYSIS = all the students in the class have had the same experience = "Group Think" aka "Class Consciousness."

Jürgen Habermas (a Marxist, member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." Deviancy becomes the "norm."

Irvin D. Yalom: "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established."

SYNTHESIS = the group, compromising to get along replaces the father, doing what you're TOLD.

György Lukács (founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

EVALUATION = from then on the student is concerned about what "the group" might think (rejecting being TOLD).

OUTCOME = Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Globalism = Totalitarianism. Attacking the father's authority for getting in the way. Rejecting Nationalism, Sovereignty, "Rule of Law," Individualism, under God.

No guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, for taking the life of the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous because they get in the way of what you WANT to do. There is no guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning against established commands, rules, facts, and truth in dialogue. In dialogue there is only the person's self interest.

Another way to look at it:

If FATHER = THESIS then the CHILDREN = ANTITHESIS therefore there can be no SYNTHESIS as each child is held personally accountable for his carnal thoughts (expressed) and carnal actions by the Father.

But if the CHILD = THESIS then the FATHER = ANTITHESIS and the CHILDREN can find what they have in common, their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint = SYNTHESIS.

If THESIS = DISCUSSION (with the Father authoring commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed or applied, and enforcing them, with the Father having the final say) then ANTITHESIS = DIALOGUE (the children's feelings and thoughts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating are restrained) and the children remain subject to what the Father says. There is no SYNTHESIS.

But if THESIS = DIALOGUE (the children's feelings and thoughts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating being expressed) then ANTITHESIS = DISCUSSION (the Father's' authoring of commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed or applied, and enforcing them, with the Father having the final say) is rejected and SYNTHESIS is the outcome where DISCUSSION is made subject to DIALOGUE resulting in the children uniting upon what they have in common, their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint (hating the Father's authority for getting in the way).

That's a very rough skeleton of the difference between the classrooms. It is a Soviet which they have not defined until recently, but the superintendent of California's education system, 1921 warned the state that the students were participating in Soviet education and they were learning to question and challenge authority. That was in California in 1921. Although he started universities, his name is not on any building. Go figure. Will C. Woods: "Has authority been banished in these later days? Has the world reached a point where it will condone the formation of pupil soviets?"

The Soviet.
(The "Group Grade" classroom)

1. a diverse "group" (which must include the deviant; "tolerance of ambiguity" aka "deviancy"),

2. dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process; there is only the persons natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint),

3. over personal-social issues (public-private partnership which means your soul is "owned" by the state; you become "human resource"),

4. in a facilitated meeting (it will not work without the serpent in the garden),

5. to a predetermined outcome (that all participants would become "group think" (immoral) and no longer respectful of a father's authority (being moral), rejecting nationalism, sovereignty, inalienable rights, individualism under God, doing what they are TOLD - labeled as being Fascist).

Karl Marx: "Only Christianity and morality are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." (The Holy Family)

Discussion And Dialogue Are Two Different Political Systems. Which one you turn to for direction determines your paradigm, the way of feel, think, and act toward your self, toward others, toward the world, and toward authority. Discussion is with the Father (with the one above), with the Father having the final say (making you subject to the laws of nature, dealing with your body and the Law of God, dealing with your soul, both of which are absolute: the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow, with no shadow of turning, and not a respecter of persons) while dialogue is with your self and the world (the many below), with you (at least in your mind) having the final say (making you subject to the law of the flesh and the world that stimulates it, making you subject to constant 'change'). Discussion: With discussion you do what you are "told," with the Father having the final say. Bohm and Peat: "In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Science, Order, and Creativity) Beware, Bohm makes discussion subject to dialogue making it a "relatively fixed position" instead of absolute, making the one holding it the one doing the "arguing" and it as being their "point of view" instead of the one they are under postion, making discussion subject to the 'change' process, negating God, the Father in the process. Dialogue: With dialogue you do what you "want," with you having the final say. Bohm and Peat: "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Science, Order, and Creativity) All of man's wisdom begins with dialogue. Only God's Word begins with discussion (with man dying to dialogue, dying to doing what he wants, which includes dying to the praises of men when it comes to behavior in order to do God, the Father, and His Son, Jesus Christ's will; the preaching of "the cross," dying to your self, your flesh and the world that stimulates it is "foolishness to the world"). Wilfred Bion (a Marxist): ". . . prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (A Memoir of the Future; you have to silence, censor, and cast out discussion, what the Father says, that which is "negative" in a room full of dialogue, subject to "self interest," to that which is "of the world," to that which is "positive") When you replace discussion (what the Father says) with dialogue (with what you want) when it comes to behavior (making discussion, right and wrong subject to dialogue, subject to the flesh, making right anyone who makes you "feel" good and wrong anyone who makes you feel "bad") you do that which is "of the world," that which comes naturally, establish your self, your lusts over and therefore you against the Father and His authority, resulting in you doing your will instead of the Father's. While discussion can not save you (your earthly father can not save you, not being perfect) without it you can not be saved (admit you are wrong, repent before God, and be saved). With dialogue you can not be saved since in dialogue you are God (a god amongst gods), not needing salvation (other than from God, the Father, from who is getting in the way of what you want aka dialogue). How can you deny your self, your lusts, your carnal nature, endure the rejection of "the group" for not 'justifying' its lusts, follow the Lord Jesus Christ, by the power of the Holy Spirit doing the Father's will and 'praxis' Genesis 3:1-6 ("Bloom's Taxonomies,"), doing what the Serpent (the master facilitator of 'change,' the master group psycho-therapist, the master social-psychologist) did to the woman in the garden in Eden (psychology; Sigmund Freud), with Adam following (socialism; Karl Marx) denying the Father, doing your will, "actualizing" your lusts, your "self interests" instead? If you make behavior subject to dialogue (to the carnal nature of man) your name can not be written in the Lamb's book of life since in dialogue you are "God," 'good' in your eyes and in the eyes of others, therefore there is no need for repentance, other than for believing in God, the Father. Finding your identity in your "self" and in "the group" ("group think"), which dialogue does, accomplishes the deed. Carl Rogers: "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual comes to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy) Irvin D. Yalom: "There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." (The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy) What are those norms? We can talk about what we want to do, what we are lusting after without fear of being judged, condemned, cast out for our carnal thoughts and carnal actions, silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in the way of what we want (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) without having a guilty conscience, with one anothers affirmation, with impunity. Labeling as 'prejudice' all that is not of human nature, of man's carnal nature, that inhibits or blocks man from doing what he wants, preventing him from having or doing what he is lusting after, unrighteousness becomes the norm and righteosness (and the righteous) the enemy. Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" We do not control ("own") what we are lusting after. It is lust that controls ("owns") us when we submit (yield) to it. TRADITIONAL EDUCATION is based upon discussion (when it comes to defining and establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior), with the parents hiring and firing teachers based upon the parents paradigm, with the parents having the final say, resulting in the teacher: 1. preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, 2. teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is and applied, 3. discussing with their students any questions the students might have regarding the facts and truth being taught, at the teachers descretion, whether the teacher has time, the students can understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking the teacher's authority, 4. rewarding and encouraging the students who get and do things right, 5. correcting the students who get things wrong, 6. chastening the student who does wrong, and 7. casting out (grouding or expelling) the student who questions, challenges, defys, disregards, attacks the teacher and-or his or her authority. In traditional education the teacher with twenty students has twenty soverign nations, each student subject to his or her parents authority. The duty of the teacher is to teach established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Any questions regarding what and how to teach is discussed with the parents, with the parents having the final say. Testing is designed by the teacher with parents knowing the source, having the final say. Only then can the parents retain control over the curriculum that is being used in the classroom. Curriculum is a political system. MARKIST EDUCATION is based upon dialogue (when it comes to defining and establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior) with 1. a diverse group of students (deviating from one another because of their parents commands, rules, facts, and truth) 2. dialoguing, 3. their opinion, 4. to a consensus, 5 over personal-social issues, 6. in a facilitated meeting, 7. to a pre-determined outcome that "What will the 'group think?'" now occupies the students minds instead of "What would my parents want me to do?" There is no Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the students carnal desires being shared and 'justified.' The students are 'liberated' from their parent's authority in dialogue, become 'equal' with one another in their right of opinion, and become 'at-one-with-one-another' in their lusting after pleasure and their resentment toward restraint, hating missing out on pleasure because they have to do what their parent says, united in questioning, challenging, disobeying, defying, disregarding, attacking their parents and their parents authority as a result of their classroom experience, having participated in a Marxist curriculum (political system) becoming a Marxist - hating authority; "You can't tell me what I can or can not do or say?" Every teacher is certified and school accredited today based upon their use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," (Marxist curriculum) in the classroom. Even "Christian." Every student's conscience is sears and soul is damned, and the nation is cursed as the result of the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies" (Marxist curriculum) in the classroom. If we contrast traditional education with Marxist education using the steps of "Bloom's Taxonomies" from Knowing, Comprehending, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluaton (I know it is the old labels) we find in traditional education, Knowing is the Father telling you what is the right and what is the wrong answer to a question, Comprehending is the understanding you will get a bad grade if you get the question wrong, in Application, if you get the question wrong your Analysis is you now KNOW you need to do what you are told as you are taken to "the woodshed," as you get a bad grade for getting the question wrong. There is no Synthesis or Evaluation in traditional education as there is no compromise accepted, there is no approve of the child getting the question wrong. In Marxist education, Knowing is the students having experienced ("sense experienced") being told they could not do something they wanted to do or they were told to do something they did not want to do and resented it, Comprehension being they can share their resentments (against being told what they can and can not do) without being judged, condemned, cast out, with Application being their sharing with one another their common experiences of resentment, with the Analysis being they can do what they want without fear of being judged, condemned, cast out, that their resentment was normal, creating Synthesis, unity (affirmation or consensus aka with feelings) with one another "class consciousness," "group think" based upon their natural inclination to lust after pleasure ("What can I get out of this situation, object, people, or person for my self?" and for "the group") and resent restraint (toward missing out on what they want and "the group" wants, them and "the group" now having become one), thus Evaluating the environment which they find themselves and using the Marxist process to bring others to the same outcome, the liberation of children from the Father's authority system, silencing, censoring, removing (killing) anyone who refuses to participate (who get in the way of "progress," what they want). Discussion And Dialogue Are Two Different Political Systems. They can not occupy the same space at the same time. One must rule over the other. We have both. Doing what we are told or doing what we want. Which one we choose when it comes to behavior rules over our lives. We can not dialogue (do what we want) without removing (denying) the Father (doing what we are told). We can not get off of dialogue (doing what we want) without being chastened by the Father (doing what we are told). Either the parents' rule or the children. The conscience or the "super-ego." God (the Father) or the Serpent (the master facilitator of 'change'). Discussion or Dialogue. Which one you turn to for direction determines the outcome. What every student should KNOW before heading off to college (or the University, Vo-tech, or the Work environment) and what every parent should KNOW before sending their child off to the classroom: Discussion is of the Father, being told by the Father what is right behavior and what is wrong, with the Father having the final say (while the earthly father is not perfect, using the office he occupies for his own self, the office is perfect, given to him by God to serve Him in). Dialogue is of the world, how the child feels and what the child thinks, with his behavior being influenced by the world or by "the group," with the "the group" having the final say (at least in the child's mind). Which one your child turns to (as promoted by the teacher in the classroom) in order to define and establish behavior determines your child's paradigm (or political system); the way your child feels, thinks, and acts toward his or her self, toward others, toward the world, and toward authority. Discussion: "In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favor of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Dialogue: "A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) You have to "suspend" the Father's authority in order to "build relationship with others on common self interest." This is the hallmark of Marxism. Obama: "Relationship built upon self interest." (What Obama taught in the Law school in Chicago) Jürgen Habermas: "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács: "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?) In discussion your child is an individual in a group (retaining the Father's authority, what you have taught him or her regarding what is right behavior and what is wrong). This is reflected in "individualism, under God." In dialogue, on the other hand "the group" is in your child's mind, which requires removal ("suspention") of the Father's authority system or paradigm (your authority) from his or her thoughts in order for your child to become at-one-with "the group," with the facilitator of 'change's' (the serpent's) "help." Affirmation by "the group." now being more important than what you say, your authority has been "washed" from your child's brain. We can only serve one or the other, the Father (discussion) or "the group" (dialogue) when it comes to defining and establishing behavior. Which one you put first determines the outcome. Capitalism is based upon discussion, doing what the parent, the teacher, the boss, the law, God says while socialism is based upon dialogue, doing what "the group" says. While with man, born of the flesh dialogue is always present, with God, who is spirit it is not. Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin ["the group," dialogue] unto death, or of obedience [the Father, discussion] unto righteousness?" God is God in discussion. Man is God in dialogue. This is why those "of and for the world" always 'reason' through dialogue (that is from the flesh) while defining and establishing what is right behavior and what is wrong. The Formula: Marxism (Satanism) is the praxis of a diverse group of people dialoguing their opinions to a consensus over personal - social issues, defining and establishing behavior according to their carnal nature, their lust for pleasure and their resentment toward restraint, in a facilitated meeting to a pre-determined outcome that no one will think and act without having "the group" ("What will 'the group' think?") in their mind in order for them to do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience, with "the group's" affirmation; with impunity. All teachers are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies," as their curriculum (political system) in the classroom. A Marxist political system. The so called taxonomies (Bloom admitted fourty years after the publication of the first taxonomy that it "was unproved at the time it was developed and may well be 'unprovable.'" Forty Year Evaluation) base 'reasoning' upon Genesis 3:1-6, using dialogue (as the master facilitator of 'change' did with the woman in the garden in Eden, with Adam following) to 'liberate' the student's from parental authority. Rejecting the Heavenly Father's authority Marxist's perceive the earthly father as the source for belief in the Heavenly Father's authority. Thus their agenda is to remove the earthly father's authority from the face of the earth; from the classroom, from the home, from the workplace, from government, even from the "church." When it comes to defining and establishing behavior, when you replace discussion, Hebrews 12:5-11, where the Father has the final say (chastening you, holding you accountable when you do wrong , disobey, sin) with dialogue, Genesis 3:1-6 (where you 'justifying' your self, your lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, reject the Father's authority, that is reject accountability for your carnal thoughts and carnal actions) you accomplish the deed. In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process (Marxism) there is no Father's authority. There is only the child's carnal nature (man's lust for pleasure and hatred toward the restrainer) being 'justified.' Luke 16:15 "And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."

Radio programs and notes: Brief Overview, Brief Introduction, And A Short Synopsis.

Overview of the dialectic process (recorded from 4/12 - 4/17, 2026):

4/12/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dopamine. (26 min.) Object of pleasure in the environment stimulates dopamine in you. You look for it in order to control it or the environment it is in in order to experience more dopamine. If I gain knowledge (via dialogue) of what stimulates dopamine in you that you were told you can not have and offer to help you experience it I "own" you.

4/13/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Formula Using Dopamine. (24 min.) Genesis 3:1-6: If I come between your Father who creates a "negative" environment, saying you can not have what you want and create a "positive" environment instead, where you can have what you want (and you participate), I "own" you (your soul), turning you against the Father and His authority. 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Jesus says man must deny himself (cast down his drugs - dopamine), pick up his cross (get rid of "the group" - the drug cartel's approval) and follow Him. Luke 9:23-26 "And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels."

4/14/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Why Bother. (39 min.) 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Karl Marx: "intolerant of any influence from without." (The Holy Family) Justifying lust (human nature) justifies hatred towards anyone getting in the way, which justifies violance toward them (silencing, censoring, or removing them) in order to lust without having a guilty conscience - there is therefore no longer a fear of judgment, condemnation, or being cast out for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, for lusting. Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" You can not see your heart as being wicked, "desperately wicked" because your lust for pleasure, the Karl Marx in you is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. Sigmund Freud had the same ideology. Norman O. Brown (a Marxist explaining the purpose of psychology): "Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents," (Doing the same process the master facilitator of 'change,' the master group psychotherpist, the social-psychologist did with two children in a garden in Eden, using dialogue, "What can I or WE get out of this situation for MY or OUR self, to satisfy MY or OUR Lusts?", when it came to defining and establishing behavior to seperate them from their Father and His authority.) The "taxonomies" "Weltanschauung," (political system), as noted by Benjamin Bloom is that of Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno, both members of the Frankfurt School, a group of Marxists who merged Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud, "the group" and the individual void of the Father's authority, who came to America in the 30's. Entering our Universites they worked from the National level down to the local replacing traditional education (which retained the Father's authority) with Marxism or contemporary education (which eradicates the Father's authority) changing (destroying) the Nation. "Bloom's Taxonomies" are secularized Satanism, intellectualized witchcraft, searing the conscience of all who participate, damning their soul, cursing the nation. Doing what they were designed by Marxists (the serpent) to do. Normal O. Brown: "To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" Everybody loves dialogue when it comes to defining and establishing behavior since it justifies their sins, their doing what they "want" to do when they were told they could not do it (or have it). Karl Marx wrote in his paper The Holy Family: "Not feeling at home in the sinful world [since sin is the norm why am I being judged, condmned, and cast out for sinning-doing what I want instead of what I was told], Critical Criticism [dialogue; questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority] must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." Friedrich Engels summed up Karl Marx's view of the Father's authority: "In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy , nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." Benjamin Bloom, in his "Taxonomies" wrote: "We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." If you let Karl Marx in the room and tolerate him, Karl Marx (sin) "owns" the room. Karl Marx, wrote about the world at his time and set about to 'change' it: "Only Christianity and morality are able to found universal kingdoms on earth." "Only within a social context [in compromise in order to initiate and sustain relationship] individual man is able to realize his own potential as a rational being." The world in his time was influenced by the Protestant reformation. Martin Luther (The founder of the Protestant Reformation): "I greatly fear that the universities, unless they teach the Holy Scriptures diligently and impress them on the young students, are wide gates to hell. I would advise no one to send his child where the Holy Scriptures are not supreme. Every institution that does not unceasingly pursue the study of God's word becomes corrupt." "Miserable Christians, whose words and faith still depend on the interpretations of men and who expect clarification from them! This is frivolous and ungodly. The Scriptures are common to all, and are clear enough in respect to what is necessary for salvation and are also obscure enough for inquiring minds . . . let us reject the word of man." As noted by Max Horkheimer (director of the Frankfurt School): "Protestantism [individualism, under God] was the strongest force in the extension of cold rational individualism." Only by moving the individual's focus away from the Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ and onto "the group" (compromise for the sake of the institution, the corporate, society) could the problem (individualism, under God) be resolved. It is all that there is today. Why bother? For "whosoever." For their soul sake. 1 John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

4/16/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - "The Field Of Force Of An Adult." (35 min.) Having read and studied over six hundred social-psychology books (some one hundred listed here) in the light of the Word of God a few quotations stand out above them all (of the some twenty-one hundred I wrote down). One is that of Kurt Lewin (a Marxist explained how the guilty conscience, what he called a "negative valence" is created and how to negate, eradicate, or destroy it - for the 'change' process, that is Marxism to take place and be sustained the searing of the conscience has to take place): "The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [in other words the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." Replacing "thou shalt surely die" with "ye shalt not surely die," replacing the "negative" with the "positive," replacing what you have been TOLD you can not do with what you WANT to do when it comes to defining and establishing behavior and the "deed" is done. The lie is the "old man" in you telling you you can do what you WANT without being held accountable. It is the law of the flesh void of the law of God. As Immanuel Kant's stated it, it is "lawfulness without law" where the law of the flesh reigns without the law of God getting in the way. Romans 7:7 "I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." György Lukács (founder of the Frankfurt School: "... the central problem is to change reality. . . . reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (History and Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?) Discussion is what the Father TELLS you you can and can not do. Dialogue is what you WANT to do. Which one you turn to when it comes to behavior determines your paradigm, how you feel, think, and act toward your self, toward others, toward the world, and toward authority. God starts with discussion, with Him having the final say. We, according to the law of the flesh (the Karl Marx in us) start with dialogue, with us having the final say. Karl Marx: "Not feeling at home in the sinful world, Critical Criticism [dialogue; questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority] must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." Karl Marx simply defined our "human" (only of the world) heart. Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" You can not see your heart as being wicked, "desperately wicked" because your lust for pleasure, the Karl Marx in you is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. For him doing it in the group, what the group has in common 'justified' it. Jürgen Habermas (a member of the "Frankfurt School"): "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." György Lukács (the founder of the "Frankfurt School"): "Only when the immediate interests are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary." Jürgen Habermas "The revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life, which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents]." Luke 16:15 "And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Colosians 3:5-10 "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them. But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth. Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds [the greek word for 'deeds' is praxis]; And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:" The world's communication today, as in the days of Noah, is through dialogue, making behavior subject to "What can I or WE get out of this situation, this object, these people, this person, this office, this position for MY or Our self, to satisfy MY or OUR LUSTS (OR WANTS)?" It is the praxis found in the "Bloom's Taxonomies," "be 'positive' not 'negative,'" "group grade," facilitated classroom, using Genesis 3:1-6, self 'justification' ('self-actualization'; Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual.") when it comes to defining and establishing behavior in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, the Father's authority (individualism, under God; the fear of God; "the field of force of an adult"), thereby negating Romans 7:14-25, the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning so all can do wrong, disobey, sin [lust or covet] with impunity, with no fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out, silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in the way (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous) without having a guilty conscience, searing the conscience of all who participate, damning their soul, cursing the Nation, doing what they were designed by Marxists to do. There is no salvation in dialogue, except salvation from the Father's authority, since in dialogue you are God. The world is united in dialogue, with the law of the flesh (lust) having the final say, divided in discussion, with God having the final say. Which one you start with determines where you will spend eternity. Psalms 36:1-4 "The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 10:3, 4 "For the wicked boasteth of his heart's desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth. The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts." Without the lust the world could not "own" you. 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." All I have to do is find out what your child is dialoguing with himself (or herself) about that you told them they could not do and let them share it without fear of being judged, condemned, or cast out and I "own" them.

4/17/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Turning A Lie Into The Truth. (21 min.) And The Truth Into A Lie. Benjamin Bloom dedicated the first of his "Taxonomies" to Ralph Tyler, a Marxist who rescued Marxists from deportation during the 40's, established a politburo system in America, and regarding education, advised six of our US Presidents. Thomas Kuhn was one of Ralph Tyler's students. "Thomas S Kuhn spent the year 1958-1959 at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavior Sciences, directed by Ralph Tyler, where he finalized his 'paradigm shift' concept of 'Pre- and Post-paradigm periods.'" "Kuhn admitted problems with the schemata of his socio-psychological theory yet continued to urge its application into the scientific fields of astronomy, physics, chemistry, and biology" "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." "If a paradigm is ever to triumph it must gain some first supporters, men who will develop it to the point where hardheaded arguments can be produced and multiplied" which eventuates "an increasing shift in the distribution of professional allegiances" whereupon "the man who continues to resist after his whole profession has been converted is ipso facto ceased to be a scientist." (The Structure of Scientific Revolution) Benjamin Bloom, paraphrasing Marxism (Friedrich Engels, summing up Karl Marx's ideology wrote: "In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy , nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." ) wrote: "We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." When dialogue, theory or opinion replaces discussion, known truth, from being told all becomes subject to the opinions of men. In this way man can sin, silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in the way without being held accountable, righteousness then becomes subject to the opinions of men. As Wilfurd Bien (director of Tavistoch, a Marxist globalist orginazation out of England) stated it, their agenda is to "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (A Memoir of the Future, capitalization in the orginal.) In dialogue you are God, making behavior subject to your carnal nature, your lusts ("What can I or WE get out of this situation for MY or OUR self, to satisfy MY or OUR lusts?"), having the final say (at least in your mind, while you are still alive). In discussion God is God, making behavior subject to His Word, having the final say (after your death). Which one you turn to, discussion or dialogue when it comes to behavior determines who directs your steps, man or God. You can only have one or the other up front, not both at the same time. Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Since Coved all "doctors" (having to participate in the "team building," "group think," Marxist process) have become mercenaries, having to serve the corporate, looking the other way when wrong has been done. That is why when I took Karen, my wife up to see a "specialist" for antibiotics for an infected sore on her lower right leg, which anyone could see, who after being told by me it was infected put a tight wrap (Unna) on it (by Naomi Olson) which (incubating it) lead to Karen's painful (excruciating) death, with Karen's "doctor" (Matthew Neilson) and the medical profession (McCook Clinic and McCook Hospital, McCook, Nebraska) all "looking the other way," for the good of the corporate (and for their jobs; their thirty pieces of silver). None dare speak up. With the Nebraska Courts, protecting the corporate, keeping me out of the Courtroom, keeping me from having justice. Since truth has been turned into a lie and lies into the truth you and your loved ones are next. When you replace discussion with dialogue when it comes to behavior wickedness will always be the outcome. Proverbs 17:15 "He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD."

4/11/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - A Short Statement. (7 min.) See statements and Notes below.

4/9/2026 Due to a recent cold (the reason I have not been doing radio shows) for a good overview of what is 'driving' and the 'purpose' for what has taken over our Nation and the World listen to the radio program done on 1/28/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Lust => Hate => Violance - Dopamine, Dialogue, Psychology Plus The Group Is Marxism, Turning The Children Against The Father And His Authority In Order For The Facilitator Of Change To Live Off Of Them And Their Father's Money, Their Inheritance. It Is The Children's Inheritance They Are Going After, "Owning" The Children In The Process. (1 hr. 8 min.) Notes When you remove the Father's authority, accountability for one's thoughts and actions, "self interests" comes to the front, engendering hatred toward the Father for getting in the way, 'justifying' the use of violance to remove Him and anyone else who gets in the way. While exposing "Bloom's Taxonomies," (the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6, of self 'justification,' negating Hebrews 12:5-11, the Father's authority, thereby negating Romans 7:14-25, the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning so all can do wrong, disobey, sin [lust or covet] with impunity, with no fear of being judged, condemned, and cast out, silencing, censoring, removing anyone who gets in the way without having a guilty conscience, searing the conscience of all who participate, damning their soul, cursing the Nation, doing what they were designed by Marxists to do) to educators their response is either "I knew there was something wrong with them," wanting to know more and what to do or "You make me feel wicked. Like I am doing something wicked," refusing to listen to me any more, walking away. Need I say more. Psalms 10:3, 4 "For the wicked boasteth of his heart's desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth. The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." Jeremiah 6:16 "Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." The students (citizens) of the "group grade" ("team building"), "Bloom's taxonomies," facilitated ("lets be 'positive' and not 'negative'" - Marxist) classroom are "children of disobedience," deviantes, doing what they want (coveting) without restraint. All who (refusing to participate) complain or get in the way will be labeled as being negative, divisive, hateful, intolerant, narrow minded, maladjusted, a lower order thinker, prejudiced, unadaptable to change, not "a team player," etc., and be silenced, censored, and-or removed ("right sized" by the corporate, "the group" - the NGO's, the "deep state," the "swamp," the "shadow government," the military establishment, the educational establishment, the medical establishment, the judicial establishment, the governmental establishments, the media establishment, the entertainment establishment, the religious establishments, etc.,) for the sake of "the group" aka society, "group think" ("class consciousness") having now replaced "What would my Father (my parents) want me to do?" It is an absolute. "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents," Their "Weltanschauung," (political system), as noted by Bloom is that of Erick Fromm and Theodor Adorno, both members of the Frankfurt School, a group of Marxists who came to America in the 30's. Entering our Universites they worked from the National level down to the local replacing traditional education with Marxism (contemporary education) changing (destroying) the Nation. Ask any teacher. They will either thank you or label you and walk away. As in the garden in Eden, if you (or your child, spouse, representative, minister etc.,) participates, your (and their) world is 'changed' (and not for the good).

4/8/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Following After Christ - Being Christlike - In A Dialectic World. () Is Being Negative, Divisive, Hateful, Maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' A Lower Order Thinker, Intolerant, Prejudiced, Irrational, Unreasonable, Not A "Team Player" When It Comes To Doing What Those Of And For The World Want You To Do. It is what the Father says (which is negative to the flesh and the world) that is being removed in the "lets be positive and not negative," "group grade," "Bloom's Taxonomies," facilitated (Marxist) classroom (and all consensus meeting around the world). Matthew 10:32-36 "Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven. Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me." The Lord did not destroy the Father's authority (as those of and for the world seek to do). He made His Father the final authority. Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.", calling all who follow Him to do as He does. Jesus: John 5:30 "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." Matthew 12:50 "For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 7:21 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." What is going on in the world today is the praxis of removing the Father in our conversation with ourself and with others, making dialogue (how we feel) instead of discussion (what the Father says) our foundation from which to reason when it comes to defining and establishing behavior. Without the Father, the Son becomes someone fighting against the establishment. The Father's wrath against us (the negative) is left out. That is why the Son came. To take His Father's wrath towards us upon Himself, redeeming us from it, with the Father raising Him from the grave to reconcilus us to Himself. "In all thy ways acknowlede Him." It is from here He directs our steps ("and He shall direct thy paths."). Jeremiah 10:23 ". . . it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." 2 Corinthians 10:5 "Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" The "church" has but dialogue ("What can we get out of this situation, this object, these people, this person, this office, this postion for our self?") before discussion ("What does the Father want me to do?") making it apostate. Put no man between you and the Father (except the Son of God, that should be understood). To do so makes you instantly apostate - god yourself (Genesis 3:1-6,; where dialogue, human nature sets itself above discussion, the Word of God when it came to defining and establishing behavior). You can only serve one, God or mammon. Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?"

4/4/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Traditional VS Marxist Education System. () In Case You Want To Know. Notes I might not get to this one, read the Notes. They are self explanitory - explaining the differance between traditional education ("old school") and contemporary education (Marxist).

4/3/2026 Dad. You Are The Cause Of Neurosis. (45 min.) The Cure For Neurosis Is To Remove ("Wash") From Your Children's Mind Your Commands, Rules, Facts, And Truth Which Prevent Them From Being Themselves, Only Of The World. Notes

4/1/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - When It Comes To Defining And Establishing Behavior Using Dialogue To "OWN" You And Your Loved Ones. In Order To Use You And Your Loved Ones For Their Own Pleasure. There Is No Other Agenda. (19 min.) Notes

3/31/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Searing The Conscience. (1 hr. 10 min.) Replacing It With The Super-Ego. Notes

3/30/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Religion Of Lies. "What can I get out of this situaton, this object, these people, this person, this office, this position for my self, to satisfy my lusts?" (11 min.) Notes

3/29/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Some More Observations. 3:00 AM so some correcting. (47 min.) See Notes on 3/24/2026.

3/28/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Some Observations. Sorry for the audio (away from home and had to use another mic.). (33 min.) See Notes on 3/24/2026.

3/24/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Reasoning And Self Preservation VS The Cross. (48 min.) Notes

3/22/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Demons Follow The Woman. (40 min.) Notes

3/20/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - "Blooms Taxonomies" Are Used In The Classroom To Eradicate Christianity And Morality. (1 hr. 14 min.) Notes

3/19/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - "Blooms Taxonomies" Are Used In The Classroom To Eradicate Christianity And Morality. (24 min.) Notes

3/18/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - How You Are Seduced, Deceived, And Manipulated. (6 min.) Notes

3/17/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Why Your Children Will Not Listen To You - Refuse To Be Told Anymore. (50 min.) Notes

3/16/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Replacing Wrong With "Better." (14 min.) Notes

3/12/2026 (I might get to it. Then I might not. Tired of talking into a barrel and not hearing my voice come back. I did get back to it. Hope springs eternal.) Discussion VS Dialogue - What Is Missing In Dialogue. (1 hr. 2 min.) Notes

3/10/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - What To Look Out For In Home School Material. (43 min) Important information in the Notes The facilitator of change (the serpent in the garden) takes the place of the Father, replacing discussion (what the Father says, with the Father having the final say) with dialogue (with how the children feel, with the children having the final say) - replacing "I KNOW" with "I FEEL" or "I THINK" - when it comes to defining and establishing behavior turning the children against the Father and His authority. WARNING: All teachers are certified and schools accredited today (christian including) by their use of "Bloom's Taxonomy," in the classroom, which have invaded home schooling material and co-ops. They were developed by Marxists to sear the conscience of all who participate, damn their soul, and curse the nation (turning the children against their parent's and God's authority).

3/9/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Traditional Education VS Contemporary. "Bloom's Taxonomy," is Marxist Education. (54 min.) Replacing the father's authority in the classroom with the facilitator of 'change,' individualism, under God with Marxism. "What would my parents want me to do?" with "What will the 'group think?'" "Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents," "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." They were designed by Marxist's to sear the conscience of all who participate, damn their soul, and curse the nation. Contrary to opinion they have not other purpose. They are the breeding ground of The corporate aka the deep state, the shadow government, the swamp aka the military, education, media, political, judicial, religious, police, et al. establishments, requiring your and your children's participation in order to take control. 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." They, through dialogue (when it comes to defining and establishing behavior) finding what you are lusting after (what you WANT that you have been TOLD you can not have), offering to "help" you achieve it "own" you.

3/8/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Whoever "Asks" You To Be "Positive" And Not "Negative," When It Comes To Behavior Is Not Your Friend But An Enemy Of Your Soul. (10 min.) Notes

3/6/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - You Are Not In Love With The Things Of The World. You Are In Love With The Dopamine They Stimulate. (41 min.) Notes

3/5/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Replacing Persuit Of Life, Liberty, And Property With Persuit Of Happiness, Liberty, And Life, (Replacing Discussion; Unalianable Rights With Dialogue; Human Rights) establishes your worth upon your social worth no longer an individual, under God. (28 min.) Notes

3/2/2026 What you will run into when your loved one is harmed or dies because of what a doctor did and why. What Led Up To And After Karen's Death. (42 min.) They (Of The Corporate) Can Do Whatever They Want To You And To Your Loved One(s) Without Accountability, And You Can Do Nothing About It. Open Note Page On What Happened To Karen By The Medical Profession of McCook Clinic And Hospital, McCook, Nebraska, And What Happened To Me By The Court System Of Nebraska. It Will Happen To You And Your Loved One(s), Where You Are. Explaining Why. (It Is Worth Reading, All The Way Through. Letting You Know What You And Your Love One's Are In For.)

3/1/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Brainwashing. How It Is Done In The Facilitated, "Group Grade," "Bloom's Taxonomy," Marxist Classroom. (42 min.) Notes And Reading From Issue Brainwashing. How it is done and why.

2/28/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Reading The Introduction (Part 2). (1 hr. 15 min.) Listen to Audio below first, Part 1 (2/27/2026) Notes

2/27/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Reading The Introduction (Part 1). (41 min.) Notes

2/26/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Don't Let A Crisis Go By Without Using It To Destroy The Father's Authority AKA Sovereignty. (54 min.) Notes

2/24/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Charlatan In The Classroom. (54 min.) Issue: Predators, Charlatans, Pimps, and Pedophiles.

2/22/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Genesis 3:1-6 Is The Formula For The "New" World Order. (54 min.) Liberating the children from the Father's authority.

2/20/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Corporate: In Defense Of Sin: (48 min.) Replacing Unalianable Rights With Human Rights, Discussion With Dialogue, The Father's Authority With The Children's Carnal Nature, The One Above With The Many Below ("The Group"), The Guilty Conscience (For Doing Wrong, Disobeying, Sinning) With The "Super-ego," (Which Requires Compromise - Silencing, Censoring, And Removing The "Negative," The Father's Authority) When It Comes To Defining And Establishing Behavior.

2/20/2026 In Discussion God Is God. In Dialogue You Are God. (22 min.) Notes

2/19/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Life VS Quality Of Life. (19 min.) Notes

2/18/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - In Plain Sight. (37 min.) Notes

2/17/2026 Why You Are Called Prejudiced And A Fascist. (1 hr. 19 min.) Notes

2/15/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Genesis 2:16, 17 Doing What You Are Told VS Genesis 3:1-6 Doing What You Want. (48 min) In discussion you do what you are told, seeking the approval of God (the Father) while in dialogue you are God doing what you want, lusting after the pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating seeking the affirmation of men, 'justifying' your and their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint. Karl Marx: "To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." Matthew 6:24 "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Romans 6:16 "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?"

2/14/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - There Is No Death In Dialogue, Only The "Eternal Present." (1 hr. 10 min.) In Dialogue You Are God, Having The Final Say (At Least In Your Mind) Until You Die. Then You Will Meet The Real God Who Will Judge You (Have You Cast Into The Lake Of Fire That Is Never Quenched) For Being A Fraud. Notes. See Notes 1/31/2026 also.

2/13/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Gaining Access To What Your Children Want Is The Key To "Owning" Them. (1 hr. 7 min.) Notes. See Notes 1/31/2026 also.

2/12/2026 Replacing Unalianable Rights With Human Rights, Individualism Under God With Socialism, Private Business With Corporatism, God With Man, Discussion With Dialogue, The Father's Authority With The Children's Lusts When It Comes to Defining And Establishing Behavior. (1 hr.) Notes. See Notes 1/31/2026 also.

2/11/2026 (10/11/2023, 7:16 PM) Karen. (49 min.) What Happened To Karen Sue Gotcher (My Wife) And Then To Me. More information on 12/11/2025 Discussion VS Dialogue - Death To America. (1 hr. 7 min.) and What Led Up To And After Karen's Death. (43 min.) See Notes 1/31/2026 also. The corporates now "own" America. The Marxist, Kenneth Benne in Human Relations in Curriculum Change stated: we "must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue." See comments below, 2/10/2026 and Notes.

2/10/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dialogue, Genesis 3:1-6, And "Bloom's Taxonomies Are AntiChrist." (1 hr. 26 min.) See Notes 1/31/2026 and Notes 2/9/2026 also. You Can Not See It Because What You Want Is Standing In The Way. Everyone Wants To Know The Truth Until It Gets In The Way Of What They Want. Lust, Hate, And Violance (What You Want, Hatred Toward Anyone Getting In The Way Of What You Want, And Getting Them Out Of Your Way) Is What We All Have In Common. It Is Our Human Nature. Apart From Dying To Our Self (Quiting The Dialogue), Picking Up Our Cross (Rejecting The Group, The Affirmation Of Others Justifying Our And Their Lusts), and Following The Lord Jesus Christ (Doing The Heavenly Father's Will, By The Power Of The Holy Spirit) All We Have Is Dialectic Reasoning (The Justifying Of Our Self, Our Lusts Before Men) And The Removing Of Anyone Who Gets In Our Way, Dying In Our Sins.

2/9/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Word Of God Is Impeccable. (1 hr. 2 min.) Notes. See Notes 2/8/2026 also.

2/8/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Repeating January 1, 2026 "How Your Politician Is 'OWNED.'" (28 min.) Notes. See Notes 1/1/2026 and Notes 2/6/2026 also.

2/7/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Unalienable Rights VS Human Rights. (40 min.) See Notes 1/31/2026.

2/6/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Thesis (Father; Discussion) - Antithesis (Children; Dialogue) - Synthesis VS Thesis (Children; Dialogue) - Antithesis (Father; Discussion)- SYNTHESIS (34 min.) Notes. See Notes 2/4/2026 also.

2/5/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - It Is All About The Father's Authority. (1 hr. 18 min.) See Notes 1/31/2026.

2/4/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Using The Scientific Method (Dialogue) On Morals And Ethics Is Marxism - AntiChrist. (58 min.) Notes. See Notes. 2/3/2026 and Notes 1/31/2026 also.

2/3/2026 Psychology Is Epstein. ( 28 min.) Notes 2/3/2026. See Notes 1/31/2026 also.

2/2/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - In Discussion God Is God. In Dialogue You Are God. (1 hr. 12 min.) Notes 2/2/2026. See Notes 1/31/2026 also.

1/31/2026 Why Bloom's Taxonomies Is Marxism - AntiChrist. (58 min.) Notes 1/31/2026.

1/29/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Being Told VS Sense Experience - The Two Father's. (1 hr 34 min.)
Discussion VS Dialogue - Being Told VS Sense Experience - The Two Father's - Reading Notes. (50 min.)
Notes

1/28/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Lust => Hate => Violance - Dopamine, Dialogue, Psychology Plus The Group Is Marxism, Turning The Children Against The Father And His Authority In Order For The Facilitator Of Change To Live Off Of Them And Their Father's Money, Their Inheritance. It Is The Children's Inheritance They Are Going After, "Owning" The Children In The Process. (1 hr. 8 min.) Notes 1/26-28/2026. Sorry for the hum in the backgroup, the heater. It has been cold recently.

1/26/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dopamine, Dialogue, Psychology, Plus The Group Is Marxism. (51 min.) Notes 1/26-28/2026.

1/25/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - A Brief (Maybe) Explanation. (24 min.) Notes 1/24-25/2026.

1/25/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Your Father's Authority Is "The Problem." (1 hr 26 min.) Notes 1/24-25/2026.

1/24/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Why I Do What I Do And What I Do. (54 min.) Sorry for the heater sound in the background, having a very cold day - trying to stay warm. Notes 1/24-25/2026.

1/23/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Facilitator Of Change (The Serpent) Replaces The Father (God) In The Consensus Process Liberating The Children From The Father's Authority. (35 min.) Notes 1/22-23/2026.

1/22/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Filling The Empty Space. (32 min.) Notes 1/22-23/2026.

1/20/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dopamine - AI (Artificial Intelligence) Filling The Empty Space (The Synaptic Gap) With Dopamine AKA Pleasure Instead Of The Mind Being Set Upon The Word Of God (Upon Doing The Heavenly Father's Will). (15 min.) Notes 1/19-20/2026.

1/19/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dopamine - The Law Of The Flesh - Lust And Affirmation - Dialogue. (51 min.) Notes 1/19-20/2026.

1/18/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dopamine - Some Added Comments On How You Are Being Seduced, Decieved, And Manipulated By The Praxis Of Psychology (Genesis 3:1-6). (1 hr. 3 min.) See Notes 1/14-16/2026.

1/17/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - How You Are Being Seduced, Deceived, And Manipulated - "Beguiled." (1 hr. 19 min.) 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." If the facilitator of 'change' can find out what you are dialoguing with yourself about, in response to what you have been told you can not have and offer to help you "acualize" it he can "own" you.

1/16/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Dopamine, Dialogue, Genesis 3:1-6, Marxism, Psychology, "Bloom's Taxonomies," And Antichrist. (1 hr.) Notes 1/14-16/2026.

1/15/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Reasoning And Self Preservation, The Beast, The AntiChrist, "Bloom's Taxonomies." (37 min.) Notes 1/14-16/2026.

1/14/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Genesis 3:1-6 = Marxism + Psychology = "Bloom's Taxonomies" = Satanism In The Classroom. (44 min.) Notes 1/14-16/2026.

1/13/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Secret Of The New World Order - AntiChrist - Is Finding Out What Your Dad Would Not Let You Do And Seduce, Deceive, And Manipulate You Into Doing It. (1 hr. 25 min.) See Notes 1/11/2026. 2 Peter 2:3 "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you."

1/11/2026 Replacing Discussion With Dialogue When It Comes To Behavior (Genesis 3:1-6) Is Satan's Formula AKA Social-Psychology, (1 hr. 31 min.) Notes The "Bloom's Taxonomies," "Group Grade," "Facilitated Classroom" (Marxist Curriculum) Is Satan's Classroom (Secularized Satanism-Intellectualized Witchcraft), Searing The Conscience, Damning The Soul Of All Who Participate, Cursing The Nation.

1/10/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Replacing Unalianble Rights With Human Rights; (47 min.) Searing The Conscience, Damning The Soul, Cursing The Nation.

1/9/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - The Police State In Defense Of The Corporate. (50 min.) National Corporate is Fascism. Global Corporate Is Communism. Both destroy the Father's authority above man and the Father's authority in the home and the guilty conscience that the Father's authority (the field of force of and adult) engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, for lusting.

1/8/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Loyalty To The Father - Patriotism Is The Enemy Of The Corporate. (1 hr. 9 min.)

1/7/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - "Let's Be Positive And Not Negative,"-"Bloom's Taxonomies" Is Marxism - Satanism, Is "Group Think" (Class Consciousness) AKA Communism, Globalism, The Spirit Of AntiChrist, Where All Must Participate Or Be Silenced, Censored, Or Removed. (40 min.)

1/6/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Government Run By Corporations Is Government Without A Conscience. (1 hr. 7 min.) Notes

1/5/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - In Dialogue There Is No Guilty Conscience. There Is Only What You Want, What You Are Lusting After Being Justified. (41 min.) Notes

1/5/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - You Can Not See What You Are Losing. (32 min.) Notes

1/3/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Application Of The Dialectic Process Of 'Change' (Marxism AKA Globalism) In Education, In The Government, In The Media, In The Medical Profession, In The "Church" . . .. (56 min.) Notes

1/2/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - Speaking Into A Barrel And Not Hearing My Voice Come Back. (1 hr. 25 min.) Notes

1/1/2026 Discussion VS Dialogue - How Your Politician Is Changed. (20 min.) Notes

Endnote

"For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, [and] hating one another. But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life." Titus 3:3-7

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8, 9

"And you [hath he quickened], who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;) And hath raised [us] up together, and made [us] sit together in heavenly [places] in Christ Jesus: That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in [his] kindness toward us through Christ Jesus." Ephesians 2:1-7

"Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour. But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks. For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them. For ye were sometimes darkness, but now [are ye] light in the Lord: walk as children of light: (For the fruit of the Spirit [is] in all goodness and righteousness and truth;) Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord.And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove [them]. For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret." Ephesians 5:1-12

"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3

"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions [antithesis] of science falsely so called [the "tossing" of opinions back and forth until you come to a consensus, i.e., to a "feeling" of oneness]: which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen." 1 Timothy 6:20-21

"I feel" and "I think," i.e., opinion or theory is not true science. Science is observable and repeatable, i..e, established, with "I KNOW" being its language not opinion. "The philosophy of praxis is the absolute secularization of thought, an absolute humanism of history." (Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks) ". . . there is no fear of God before his eyes." Psalms 36:1 ". . . God is not in all his thoughts." Psalms 10: 4 "He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22 ". . . and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3

"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them. But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth. Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds [the greek word for 'deeds' is praxis]; And have put on the new [man], which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:" Colosians 3:5-10

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3:5, 6

". . . for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day." 1 Timothy 1:12

The nation 'changed,' i.e., became 'liberal' when teachers became facilitators of 'change' ('change' agents). Instead of teaching facts and truth they ask their students how they felt and what they thought when told what to do and what not to do, when it came to defining and establishing right and wrong behavior, turning them against parental authority, i.e., against the father's/Father's authority system a. k. a. the Patriarchal paradigm. In dialogue, i.e., "I feel" and "I think" you are god. When done in a group you are a god amongs god's - with god (worldly peace and socialist harmony) becoming (a gnostic construct). In discussion, i.e., "I KNOW because I am told, i.e., because dad, God, the laws of nature, my teacher, etc., says so" you are not god, with a higher authority than you having the final say. There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue. There is only your carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating (what you have in common with all mankind on the earth) being 'justified.' Karl Marx wrote in his paper The Holy Family: "Not feeling at home in the sinful world, Critical Criticism [dialogue; questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority, i.e., what "is"] must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." Friedrich Engels summed up Karl Marx's view of absolutes, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system: "In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy , nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." Benjamin Bloom in his "Taxonomies of Educational Objectives" curriculum (paraphrasing Karl Marx) wrote: "We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." (Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain) All "teachers" (thinking and acting as facilitiator's of 'change') are certified and schools (including private, "Christian," and home schooling co-ops) are accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies," i.e., Marxist curriculum in the classroom, making the student's (and the teacher's) feelings and thoughts of the 'moment' that the world (that the classroom environment, i.e., that "the group") is stimulating the means to knowing right and wrong behavior, negating their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system as being the means to knowing. Excluding (denying) the father's/Father's authority in making decisions is the hallmark of Marxism.

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2026