Vladimir Lenin 1920 - American Politics 2020.
(Personal note.)
by
Dean Gotcher
"The peasantry [the father's/Father's authority system] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the traditional "middle-class" family]—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions everywhere." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920)
The "bourgeoisie" are those who hold themselves and others accountable to doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, requiring them to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline (capitulate) their "self" in order (as in the so called "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do what they have been told, i.e., to do that which those above them demand they do. Individualism is created as each individual is treated according to how he or she responds to authority, engendering individualism, under God, God being the highest authority. The earthly father is not perfect, he may be or may have been a downright tyrant, using the office of authority he occupied for his "self," i.e., to serve his own carnal desires, i.e., his "self interests," i.e., his "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, but the office itself is perfect, having been given to him by God, the Heavenly Father, who is perfect, in which to serve Him, i.e., in which to do His will. As you will see it is the guilty conscience—(that sense of accountability, i.e., the fear of judgment) that the father's/Father's authority engenders in the individual for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—that "the peasantry constantly regenerates" that has to be negated in order to prevent the "bourgeoisie," i.e., the father's/Father's authority (system), i.e., "bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions" from reappearing in society, i.e., in "the people," i.e., in the leadership—holding their "self" accountable to a authority higher then their "self," who inhibits or blocks them from enjoying the carnal pleasures, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, in order to do right and not wrong according to his/His established commands, rules, facts, and truth.
"[E]very one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12
"I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7
"Lust is not "lust," i.e., "covetousness" is not "covetousness" until you want something you have been told you are not to have, i.e., that is not yours, i.e., that is not good for you—made manifest when you take, have, or do (or you are thinking about taking, having, or doing) something for your "self" that you have been told is not yours (or good or right for you) to take, have, or do.
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:'" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing) He then says "unfortunately" since the family structure, i.e., the father's authority is no longer supported in the community, social(ist) programs, like "community policing" need to be set up to "help" children become their "self," i.e., adjust to a 'changing' world, i.e., a world no longer recognizing and/or supporting the father's authority in the home.
The father's/Father's authority system engenders individualism, under authority. As each child is held personally accountable for his own actions, i.e., his response toward authority he develops a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. It is the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating that has to be negated if 'change' is to be initiated and sustained. This requires the negation of the father's/Father's authority which influences the children's thoughts (relationship with their "self") and actions (relationship with others), i.e., negating the condition that initiates and sustains "repression" and "alienation," "repression" in that you can not do what you want to do, when you want to do it and "alienation" in that you can not have "relationship" with those who are doing what you want to do, when you want to do it—doing it, i.e., putting "lust" into praxis without you.
"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11
"For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me." "O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." (excerpts from Romans 7:14-25)
The father's/Father's authority consists of 1) preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and discussing with the child any question(s) he or she might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the father's discretion, i.e., providing he deems it necessary, has time, the child is capable of understanding and is not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority, 2) blessing or rewarding the child who obeys and does things right, 3) chastening or correcting any child who does things wrong and/or disobeys, so he might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to obey and/or do things right, and 4) casting out (expelling-in education, grounding-in the home) any child who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, attacks authority.
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
| The soul knows by being told. The flesh by "sense experience." |
Socialists must negate individualism, under God, i.e., accountability to God, i.e., the father's/Fathers' authority system, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in order to rule over the people without being held accountable to a "higher authority" other than to their "self," i.e., to their own carnal desires, i.e., to their "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating (that which all "the people" have in common—which is the basis of common-ism aka Communism. Dialectic 'reasoning,' which is the basis of Communism, goes like this: since 1) "'The people' lust" 2) and "I lust," 3) "How I feel everybody feels," 4) therefore "I am the personification of 'the people'," 5) "Therefore anyone getting in the way of my feelings, i.e., 'the people's' feelings, i.e., lust must be negated for the good of 'the people,' i.e., for the good of my self."), 'liberating' their "self" from having a guilty conscience that the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, so they can remove (negate) anyone who gets in their way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous without having a guilty conscience, requiring everyone else to think and act the same way, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. i.e., with everyone else's approval, i.e., affirmation. Since everyone does wrong, disobeys, sins, by focusing upon what all people have in common, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," that which divides, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth that differ from individual to individual, from family to family, from city to city, from state to state, from nation to nation, from "church" to "church" is negated. According to Vladimir Lenin et al., the guilty conscience, the "residue" of the father's/Father's authority in the individual has to be negated if society is to be "detoxed" of the father's/Father's authority (system). Until then, according to Lenin, et al. the fathers (and those who support, propagate, and defend the father's authority system) have to be silenced, censored, or shot. A "better" way (known as a "Velvet Revolution") is to use the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process in establishing policy, thereby negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, 'changing' society without having to shoot the fathers outright (they just become irrelevant, not worth listening to, obstacles in the way, i.e., "minority reports"—to be disregarded as laws are made without them, i.e., bypassing their input, i.e., "We thank you for showing up and giving us your opinion, now lets get on with the business at hand.").
There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the individual's carnal desires, i.e., his "self interests," i.e., his "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—what he has in common with everyone else in the room, i.e., "in the world." Rejecting the Father's authority, the Word of God, and the Holy Spirit who confirms it, all man has (as a consequence) is the cognitive, affective, and psycho-motor domains, i.e., his carnal nature, i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way. What we "want" to eat or do not want to eat ("like" or "dislike") off of the lunch menu is dialogue. What we should eat or should not eat (whether we like it or not) is a discussion. If we "want" to eat what we know is not good for us to eat (we know we should not eat it) we go to dialogue, 'justifying' to our "self" and to others it is "ok" to eat it ("this time"), doing what we "want" without having a guilty conscience (at least at the 'moment').
The key was to 'discover' how the guilty conscience is engendered and then negate the condition that engenders it, i.e., 'change' the "environment" where right and wrong behavior is determined, i.e., defined, i.e., decided. This required letting the "leader," who in his mind personifies "the people" lead, i.e., "help" "the people" decide right and wrong behavior themselves (according to their carnal nature, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "self interests" of the 'moment') instead of the leader, who in his mind is subject to individuals, under God, therefore accountable for his actions to God, i.e., to a higher authority than his "self," i.e., his "human nature," i.e., his "lust," i.e., his "self interest"—requiring everyone else to be held accountable for their actions, according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., "rule of law" as well. What Vladimir Lenin realized: unlike the father's/Father's authority system, where the children who disagreed, when they come of age can leave and do "their thing" somewhere else, with most restoring the father's/Father's authority system there "in order to get ahead," no one should be allowed to leave, i.e., escape, i.e., everyone must participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process (in all activities of life, i.e., in the family, in the classroom, in the workplace, in all social/public activities, in the police force, in the military, in the media, in entertainment, etc., from the lowest to the highest offices of the land, even in the "church," i.e., the 501c3 state certified "Church") if the negation of the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders is to be successful removed, not just locally but globally as well. For the dialectic process, i.e., Communism to be successful no one can escape, everyone has to participate (borders must be negated). Everyone thinks the "Berlin Wall" came down because Communism was defeated. The "Berlin Wall" came down because Communism had succeeded—in the form of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process to determine right and wrong behavior in all activities of life, all around the world. It is how policy is being made in all parts of society today, everywhere you go.
"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin, A Dynamic Theory of Personality)
According to Kurt Lewin, since the guilty conscience, what he called a "negative valence" is the result of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the father's/Father's threat of punishment ("Thou shalt surely die"), what Kurt Lewin called "an induced field of force of an adult," for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, preventing the child from having or doing what he desires to do or from having what he wants to have in the 'moment' (what Lewin called "a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child"), by simply removing (in the mind, i.e., the "sense perception" of the child) the father's/Father's authority, i.e., by putting the child in a ("Ye shalt not surely die") "safe zone, space, or place," i.e., in a "Be positive, not negative," "group grade," "affective domain," permissive, tolerant environment determining right and wrong behavior, where he can question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack authority without fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or cast out—negating that which is "negative" (called "the negation of negation")—without fear of reprimand or punishment, i.e., "if this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears" i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is negated. In this way you do not have to physically kill the father, all you have to do, when it comes to deciding right and wrong behavior, is draw (seduce, deceive, and manipulate) him into participating in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process (where there is no father's/Father's authority) and he will neuter himself, i.e., abdicate his authority, negating the guilty conscience which his authority engenders in the process. As Sigmund Freud wrote:
"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [that is, the father no longer exercises his authority in the home, over his property, in his business, etc., i.e., the father abdicates his God given authority (doing things right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth) for the sake of initiating and/or sustaining "relationship" with his children or employees—"relationship" is based upon common "feelings," i.e., common "self interests," i.e., common "lusts," i.e., common carnal desires, negating individualism, under God, fellowship around established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority engendering individualism, under God]." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)
"Superego development is conceived as the incorporation of the moral standards of society [which requires compromise, i.e., suspending, as upon a cross, any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of building "relationships," in order to "get along," leaving those who are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" comfortable (undisturbed) in what they are doing, saying, and/or thinking—just don't bring it up and if it is brought up change the subject, etc., i.e., go to dialogue leaving the father's/Father's authority system out of the conversation]." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
Instead of right and wrong behavior being decided by the father/Father, i.e., by established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., by standards which are foreign to the child's carnal nature, right and wrong behavior is 'discovered' by the children, i.e., "the people," making their "self," i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "lust," i.e., what all the children, i.e., all "the people" have in common the standard, replacing the guilty conscience, i.e., the voice of the father/Father with the "super-ego," i.e., with the voice of "the group," i.e., the voice of "the people," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' who is manipulating them. When the facilitator of 'change' brings the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process into the room, in order to determine right and wrong behavior, it is all about him 'justifying' his "self," i.e., his "lusts" before all who are in the room, wanting their approval, i.e., their affirmation, telling those who resist him "It's not about you."
"It is not individualism that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)
By focusing upon the family, i.e., "human relations," the father's/Father's authority is negated.
"The individual is emancipated in the social group." "Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt [the guilty conscience for disobeying the father/Father] be assuaged." (Brown)
| Dialogue negates discussion, engendering 'change,' i.e., 'justifying' "lust." |
The greatest barrier to socialism, globalism is the father's/Father's authority system which creates individualism, under authority—judging children based upon whether they are humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining (capitulating) their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will, approving them, or they are 'justifying' their "self," i.e., their "lusts"—rejecting a process which all children have in common around the world, a process in which all the children of the world can be united upon. The former is a process which divides the children between those who accept the father's authority, i.e., who accept the father's standards, making his standards their standards, obeying them, i.e., obeying him from those children who do not—dividing his children from one another not only in the home but also from the children who are outside the home, whose parent's standards are in conflict with his or who themselves do not agree with his authority over his children, i.e., their parents authority over them.
"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, negated] in theory and in practice [in the individuals thoughts and in his actions, i.e., in his relationship with others]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)
What the "earthly family" and the "Holy Family" have in common is the father's/Father's authority system which requires children/man to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their/his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Rejecting the "Holy Family," perceiving it as only the byproduct of the "earthly family," Karl Marx et al. made the "earthly family," with its father's authority system the object to negate. It is the only way in which his plan/agenda for "worldly peace and socialist harmony" can become "real," i.e., "actual."
"The life which he [the child] has given to the object [to the father/Father—when the child humbles, denies, dies to, disciplines, controls his "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)
On the scale of "human nature" the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, that get in the way of your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating is "negative," while the child's carnal nature in you, i.e., your natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates is "positive." By making "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" the scale from which to determine right and wrong behavior, only the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust" in the child and the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust" in the father take on meaning, i.e., have value, i.e., can "self" (human nature in you, i.e., "lust") and the "other" (human nature in the other, i.e., "lust") come together as one.
"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Luke 16:13
"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16
"... for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10
When you are "asked" (coerced) to be "positive" and not "negative" you are living in Vladimir Lenin's totalitarian world. You are being pressured, under threat of loss of reputation, i.e., being 'labeled,' loss of job, and/or life (Abraham Maslow said this process would "cost much blood") to set aside the "negative," i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., accountability for your thoughts and actions, i.e., "ye shalt surely die" and participate in the "positive," i.e., "thou shalt not surely die," i.e., tolerating those who are "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates for the sake of their approval (affirmation—they can only affirm your carnal nature as you affirm theirs), removing (or looking the other way when they are removed), i.e., negating those who get in the way of "pleasure," including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous for the "good" of "the group," i.e., society, i.e., the socialist, i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., your "self," doing so without having a guilty conscience.
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
In other words, it is "lust" that unites you with what is "actual" (practical, i.e., what has meaning to you, i.e., your flesh) i.e., that "reconciles" you "to the world," requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way. "Lust" cannot become the only 'drive' and its augmentation the only 'purpose' of life until the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is negated. (There is also a desire to be right and do right, i.e., a desire to have a clear conscience which this process negates, negating the guilty conscience by making the sub-conscience, i.e., "lust" the driving force for determining right and wrong behavior) 'Change' in leadership, from being told what is right and what is wrong behavior to being "helped" (facilitated) to become one's "self," i.e., "self" 'justified, i.e., "lust" 'justified,' i.e., "self-actualized" is therefore essential for 'change' to become 'reality,' i.e., for "lust," i.e., human nature to become the way of life.
"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)
Immanuel Kant (who preceded Georg Hegel, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud) wrote of a time where "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lust," i.e., the law of the flesh would be the law of the land, void of the father's/Father's authority—resulting in the people no longer having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating since the father's/Father's authority was negated. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) As Karl Marx put it: "Laws must not fetter human life; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities of the people change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') Read: as his "needs and capacities" 'change.'
"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 1 John 2:15 The "love of the Father" is toward the children, willing to give of himself for them. The love of the child is toward "lust," i.e., his "self." The child is not in love with the object, be it a person or thing. He is in love with the pleasure (dopamine emancipation) it stimulates, tossing it aside when it no longer gives him pleasure or gets in the way.
"Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)
By established "sense experience," i.e., "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which is "of the world" as the only means to knowing the truth, your natural inclination, i.e., impulse or urge to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., "mimesis" becomes the means to and the measure of your being or becoming normal.
"Mimesis," i.e., "impulse, the primary fact, back of which, psychically we cannot go." (John Dewey, "Social Psychology," Psychological Review, I )
"Universal Reconciliation relies on a reason that is before reason-mimesis or 'impulse.'" (Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action)
"'The realm of freedom lies beyond mimesis.'" (Herbart Marcuse in Stephen Bronner, Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists)
Establishing the law of the flesh, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," what Karl Marx called "sensuous need" and "the lust of the eyes," what he called "sense perception," which only "proceed from Nature," i.e., "from the world" as the only way to know the "truth," he made "the pride of life," what he called "sense experience" the only means to determining what is right and what is wrong behavior, i.e., who should be accepted (listened to) and who should be rejected (censored), i.e., who should live and who should die. (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)
"Prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)
In other words, following Georg Hegel's "scientific method," "science" is not "science" until you can "feel," i.e., "sense experience" it for your "self." In other words: A tree, when it falls makes no sound unless you are around to hear it—making "science," i.e., nature subject to your carnal nature, not to laws established by God, once and for all. The father/Father, requiring the child/man to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., not 'justifying' the child's/man's "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating must therefore be negated. It is not rocks, plants, and animals that is being evaluated here.
"Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Luke 11:35
"The ideas of the Enlightenment taught man that he could trust his own reason [his own "feelings," i.e., his "sensuous needs" and "sense perception," i.e., his "sense experience"] as a guide to establishing valid ethical norms and that he could rely on himself, needing neither revelation [the Word of God, i.e., the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth] nor that authority of the church [the Son of God, Jesus Christ] in order to know good and evil." (Stephen Eric Bronner Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists)
It is "human nature," making all mankind subject to the world, where knowing, i.e., the truth does not come from being told but from 'discovering' it for your "self," i.e., from your "self," i.e., from your carnal nature that the world stimulates. Therefore if you put a child in an environment that engenders "lust" and he does not "lust" he is abnormal. It he tells others not to "lust" he is mentally ill, needing therapy. All a "behavior scientist" can do is attach or re-attach the patient to his "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, overcoming, i.e., negating the guilty conscience ("neurosis") that is getting in the way. Dialogue accomplishes the deed without having to use outright physical violence, with only emotional violence (rejection and depression) being experienced by those who refuse to participate, resulting in physical, i.e., tangible, i.e., personal violence (bad grade, no good job, no promotion, loss of job, loss of reputation, etc., due to being 'labeled' a "resister to 'change," i.e., not being a "team player," i.e., being "mentally ill," etc.,) as a byproduct later on.
"Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
"The shift in perspective from God [from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from "What does the father/Father want me to do?"] to human beings [to the child's carnal nature, i.e., to "What can I get out of this for me?" and "What is going to happen to me if they reject me?"] has ... a consequence." (Jürgen Habermas, The inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory)
"By shifting the group's attention from 'then-and-there' to 'here-and-now' material, he performs a service to the group … focusing the group upon itself. (Irvin D. Yalom, Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy)
"We must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions [those holding onto the father's/Father's authority system, having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, insisting upon discussion instead of dialogue] in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue." (Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
Marxism "works" because of your heart, i.e., your natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and your natural inclination to hate restraint, i.e., hate missing out on pleasure—'justifying' your "self," i.e., your "lusts" before your "self" and others, along with your dissatisfaction with or your resentment or hatred toward those who get in your way, i.e., get in "lust's" way.
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9
Your heart establishes the child's carnal nature in you, i.e., your "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires (your "lusts") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. By making pleasure, i.e., "lust" the standard for "good" (only God is good) you become God. Your heart is "desperately wicked" in that it hates restraint, i.e., hates the father's/Father's authority for "getting in the way," i.e. for preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. You cannot see your hate of restraint, i.e., your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the Karl Marx in you as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., your "lust," i.e., your "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug your "lust" for pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., your "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness"—which is being expressed toward the father/Father (and those who have faith in and obey him/Him), who is (are) preventing or trying to prevent you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., when you are "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—making you not just "wicked" but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain pleasure, keep pleasure, or get pleasure back, which includes the praises (affirmation, i.e., 'justification') of men ("the pride of life"), with you removing or attempting to remove anyone who is getting in the way.
"Not feeling at home in the sinful world. Critical Criticism must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)
Dialogue is "intolerant of any influence from without." When you cannot have your way, i.e., satisfy your "lusts," because you will be held accountable, i.e., chastened or cast out, dialoguing with your "self," i.e., 'justifying' your "self," i.e., your "lusts," you set "up a sinful world in your own home," hating, i.e., wanting to get rid of whoever "without" is getting in your way—ready to put "Critical Criticism" aka "critical theory," "critical thinking," "higher order thinking skills in morals and ethics," i.e., questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority into action (praxis), just needing "help" (encouragement and support) to do so.
"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25 "For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be." Matthew 24: 38, 39 "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." Genesis 6:5 "... the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth;" Genesis 6:5; 8:21"And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man." Luke 17:26
Just because it is fun, i.e., it brings pleasure, i.e., it stimulates dopamine emancipation and (it "seems") "everybody is doing it," does not make it right.
"The words 'seem to' are significant; it is the perception which functions in guiding behavior." (Rogers)
The child is not in love with the toy, he is in love with the dopamine emancipation that the toy stimulates, casting it aside when it no longer brings him pleasure, i.e., it no longer stimulates dopamine emancipation in him. The child is able to turn a broomstick (for example) into a horse and riding it, i.e., get pleasure from it without having to deal with all the dangers and responsibilities that comes with riding and taking care of a real horse. The child can therefore, in his imagination, turn the world that "seems to be" into 'reality,' hating anything or anyone who gets in the way. When that nature, i.e., the imagination of the heart is made reality, i.e., what is 'actual,' i.e., what "is," i.e., 'justified' evil things can be done without any sense of accountability, until it is to late. With the imagination of the mind you built things based upon established commands, rules, facts and truth. With the imagination of the heart you built relationship based upon your carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people (imagined or real) are stimulating.
"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)
By making the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, that which all children have in common, the standard from which to determine right and wrong behavior, the child is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority (system) in his mind, making all that is the father's/Father's the child's property or rather the property of whoever is "helping" the child 'justify' his "self" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority system. Georg Hegel, sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself (who was not yet born), wrote:
"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [all naturally "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating], where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [where there is no "top-down" authority structure with the husband/father ruling over the wife/children], the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life) (Note: dialogue is informal, making all equal, discussion is formal, retaining the father's/Father's authority system, with the father/Father having the final say)
The consequence of such 'logic' is that your children, your spouse, your property, your business, including you do not belong to you (under God) but to the world, i.e., to the "state," i.e., to society, i.e., to "the people," i.e., to the collective, i.e., to the facilitator or 'change,' i.e., to whoever talked you into believing it—with you following them because they "helped" you 'justify' your "lusts."
"The fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody." (Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on Inequality)
"Parents have no right upon their offspring except a psychological right. Literally the children belong to universality [the facilitator of 'change']." (J. L. Moreno, Who Shall Survive?)
When "leadership" replaces preaching, teaching, and discussing right and wrong behavior which is subject to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—which is supportive of the father's/Father's authority system, which blocks or inhibits "lust," where "the earth is the Lord's, and the fullness thereof" (1 Corinthians 10:26), with man having "dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." (Genesis 1:26), with "wives submitting theirselves unto their own husbands, as unto the Lord" (Ephesians 5:22), and children honor their "father and mother" (Exodus 20:12)—with dialogue, it 'justifies' the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust," 'justifying" the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., hate, i.e., rebellion, anarchy, revolution, fulfilling Karl Marx's "I am nothing and I should be everything," "The proletariat [the "child of disobedience"] thus has the same right as has the German king when he calls, the people his people and a horse his horse" ideology (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right'), establishing "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority system. Most people, when they drive by your property recognize it as yours. A socialist perceives it as his, i.e., what he see he owns (you are just keeping it up for him—don't get behind on your payments, i.e., taxes, which he sets or you will discover how much property you own, i.e., you do not own [the power to tax is the power to destroy]).
"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3
By gaining access (through dialogue) to your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment,' i.e., what you "covet," i.e., your "What can I get out of this situation and/or person for my 'self'?," using "feigned words," i.e., plastic words (Gr.), giving you what you want to hear in order to gain your trust thereby being able to move you down their pathway, facilitators of 'change' are able to turn you into "human resource," i.e., "merchandise" so they can use you for their own pleasure and gain (profit), buying and selling your soul on the open market of trade with your approval.
"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)
When "leadership" uses dialogue, i.e., "self interest" (tolerating "lust") in order to establish right and wrong behavior, instead of preaching, teaching, and discussing established commands, rules, facts, and truth (condemning, limiting. or blocking "lust"), "lust" is 'justified,' i.e., "lust" becomes the law of the land, i.e., "the people" are 'changed'—thereafter anyone standing in "lusts" way is condemned, i.e., becomes the enemy of "the people," i.e., the enemy of "the state."
"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)
In a discussion you must suspend, as upon a cross your "self," i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., you must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline (capitulate) your "self" in order to hear and receive (accept) the command, rule, fact, or truth someone else is telling you, which initiates and sustains the father's/Father's authority (system) in the outcome.
"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)
In dialogue you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rules, fact, or truth that prevents the act of dialogue, i.e., that inhibits or blocks the other person from sharing their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, which 'justifies' "lust" in the outcome.
"Every form of objectification [the children honoring the father's/Father's authority system, submitting their "self" to commands, rules, facts, and truth that are external, i.e., foreign to their carnal nature, i.e., void of "lust," i.e., pleasure]... results in alienation. Transcending alienation involves transcending objectification [negating the father's/Father's authority system]." "Alienation and reification [doing the father's/Father's will instead of yours, dividing you from your "self," i.e., "lust" and others like you, i.e., "lusting"] destroy both the dialectical interrelation of being and consciousness and, as a necessary consequence, the dialectical interrelation of theory and practice." (Bronner)
"Alienation has a long history. Its most radical sense already appeared in the biblical expulsion from Eden." "God is the anthropological source of alienation." ibid.
| When objective truth (the father's/Father's authority) is rejected, all that is left is subjective truth (the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life.") |
Replacing the father's/Father's authority with the facilitator of 'change,' 'changes' the way children think and act, i.e., the way they communicate with their "self" and with others. Discussion retains the father's/Father's authority, i.e., who has the final say, while dialogue makes everyone equal, negating the father's/Father's authority. By changing communication from preaching, teaching, and discussing commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed as given, by faith in order to do or be right and not wrong (according to them) to the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, "human nature," i.e., "lust" is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority system. When you are silent in the midst of dialogue, i.e., "lust" (when it comes to right and wrong behavior) you manifest and 'justify' "lust," i.e., your carnal desires which you have been privately thinking (dialoguing with your "self") about (which includes the approval of men) over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority. Without the use of dialogue in determining right and wrong behavior 'change,' at least rapid 'change' cannot be initiated and sustained, i.e., "lust" cannot be 'justified,' i.e., "lust" cannot become the way of life. When "lust," i.e., "self interest" is the medium through which communication flows, i.e., when dialogue (opinion) is used to determine right and wrong behavior 'change' becomes the way of life, i.e., people sacrifice their soul upon the altar of "self preservation," i.e., "lust," i.e., the "law of sin." Any time you bring discussion (commands, rules, facts, and truth) into a room full of people who, through dialogue are deciding right and wrong behavior ('justifying' their "feelings," i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "self interests" of the 'moment') you become the source of controversy, i.e., the cause of conflict and tension, needing to quit insisting upon everyone being right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth and join in the dialogue 'justifying' "the people's" "lusts" so there can be peace and harmony ("worldly peace and socialist harmony") in the room again. Once you go into dialogue, i.e., abdicate discussion for the sake of "the group's" approval there is no going back, i.e., "humpty dumpty" has fallen off the wall and can not be put back together again. If you try. "the group" will turn on you to destroy you, with the end (their peace and harmony, i.e., "lust") 'justifying' the means (whatever it takes).
The following is inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb. It is the basis for personal-social-political (global) 'change.'
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11)
All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once the father's/Father's authority is no longer in their way, i.e., they become father's themselves, "doing their own thing," i.e., doing what they want when they want.
"We have to study the conditions which maximize ought-perceptiveness." "Oughtiness [dissatisfaction with authority] is itself a fact to be perceived." "If we wish to permit the facts to tell us their oughtiness, we must learn to listen to them in a very specific way which can be called Taoistic ["sense experienced," i.e., listening to their "feelings," i.e., their "lusts" and hates without being judgment or condemning]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
Without the children, through dialogue, 'discovering' their "self, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "ought" and their hate (of restraint) in each other, the father's/Father's authority system cannot be negated in their thoughts and actions.
"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)
The problem, according to Karl Marx, et, al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do, getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, i.e., preventing them from being (becoming) their "self," i.e., preventing 'change.'
"The dialectical method was overthrown—the parts [the children] were prevented from finding their definition within the whole [within "the group" through dialogue]." (Lukács)
Without creating a world of dialogue, the child, privately dialoguing within (with) his "self" his love of pleasure and hate of restraint (doing so in private out of fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or being cast out) will remain forever "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority system—since he is not strong enough, by his "self' to overthrow the father/Father and his/His authority system. The curious thing is, if the father's authority naturally occurs when the father has children, protecting them from the world, why then must it be negated. The answer is, there are those who want to rule over the children themselves, using them (and their inheritance) for their own carnal pleasures, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts," without being held accountable, i.e., having a guilty conscience for their carnal thoughts and carnal actions (against the father and his children).
Dialogue resolves "the age old problem of the relationship between 'is' and 'ought.'" "Discovering one's real nature is simultaneously an 'ought' quest and an 'is' quest. An 'Ought-Is-Quest' is a religious quest in the naturalistic sense. 'Is' becomes the same as 'ought.' Fact becomes the same as value. The world which 'is' becomes the world which 'ought' to be [illusion, i.e., what we dream, i.e., what we image, i.e., what we "lust" after that the world stimulates becomes reality, i.e., all there "is," religion being anything that gets in the way, i.e., that is not of the world, i.e., that is not in harmony with "lust"]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
"It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is?" (President Bill Clinton testifying before the Grand Jury)
By making "ought" "is,", i.e., putting thought, i.e., opinion, i.e., "lust" into practice, i.e., making imagination (the imagination of the heart, as in the days of Noah) what "is," all information, i.e., commands, rules, facts, and truth have to become subject to "ought," i.e., dialogue, i.e., "lust," i.e., "self interest" making all information that 'justifies' "lust" "appropriate information" and any information that gets in the way of "lust" "inappropriate information," needing to be censored, not brought up, or discredited (no matter how factual it is or true). All professions, including the media have become subject to this filter (algorithm, bias, prejudice, paradigm, etc.), i.e., dialogue, i.e., ought, i.e., thought, i.e., theory, i.e., opinion, i.e., "lust," i.e., "self interest," treating dialogue (opinion), i.e., "feeling" ("sernsuous needs" and "sense perception," i.e., "sense experience," i.e., only that which is of "Nature," i.e., of the world) as "is," i.e., as fact or truth, putting it into praxis, washing from the brain the father's/Father's authority—which engenders a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—removing from any conversation established commands, rules, facts, or truth that get in the way (of "lust"), preventing any such information (news) from being passed on—making the focus of communication the "building of relationship" based upon common "self interests," i.e., "human nature," i.e., "lust." The objective is to convert the ought of "I ought to be able to do what I want when I want, as the father/Father does, i.e., telling and making others do what I want them to do" to the ought of "I ought to be able to do what I want to do when I want to do it, along with everyone else, without the father's/Father's authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth getting in the way." The dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process accomplishes the deed, removing "Thou shalt surely die," i.e., accountability for one's carnal thoughts and carnal actions from any conversation. When someone tells you "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" they are simply saying "Everyone is entitled to their 'lusts' without you getting in the way, messing up their day," i.e., "I am entitled to my 'lusts' without you getting in the way, messing up my day."
"Despotism ... which predominates in the human heart." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
George Washington pointed out in his farewell address that politics is effected by the heart of man, requiring "limited government," i.e., separation of the branches of government in order to prevent "despotism," i.e., the heart of man, i.e., deceitfulness and wickedness, i.e., "self interest" from ruling over "the people." It is your "self interest" that makes you a slave to those who offer to "help" you achieve it, i.e., whose "self interest" is to own you, i.e., to buy and sell your soul.
"It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution, in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
Vladimir Lenin's form of government, i.e., socialism aka Communism, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process is based upon the heart of man, i.e., the consensus process negating limited, representative government (where those in government are subject to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., "rule of law," not to their "self," i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world stimulates), where those in government can remove all who get in their way without having a guilty conscience. You cannot "re-present" your "self," i.e., your opinion, i.e., your "feelings," you can only present your position or re-present another persons position and the laws that protect your and his right to have it, i.e., who sent you there in the first place, in his place to re-present his position, i.e., him—called "limited government," which allows the citizen the greatest amount of freedom, i.e., freedom of the conscience, i.e., of private convictions, property, and business, i.e., individualism, under God (unalienable rights, rights given to him from above, unchangeable, not from man, which would make them ever 'changeable,' subject to the "felt needs," i.e., opinions, i.e., "self interest" of those in power). The dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process negates limited, representative government, i.e., unalienable rights, i.e., sovereignty, i.e., Nationalism, i.e., freedom of the conscience (making freedom from the conscience the desired outcome). (What you lose, i.e., is not included in dialogue.) There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of those making policy at the 'moment,' making all laws subject to "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "human nature," negating all who get in the way or refuse to participate.
"All cooperative schemes which provide equal remuneration to the skilled and industrious and the ignorant and idle must work their own downfall. For by this unjust plan they must of necessity eliminate the valuable members and retain only the improvident, unskilled, and vicious." (Robert Dale Owen, Robert Owen's son)
"And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the inheritance; for ye serve the Lord Jesus Christ." Colossians 3:23-24
"Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord our of a pure heart." 2 Timothy 2:22
Robert Owen, i.e., Dale Owen's father was the founder of socialism in America, whose experiment failed because he was not able to keep the "skilled and industrious" workers, i.e., the "valuable members," who left to work somewhere else (where their skills and industry were appreciated and they did not have to endure/suffer spiritual and moral abuse) because they could (something socialists have learned they cannot allow to take place) because the "ignorant and idle" must get the same pay and "lust" must be tolerated. Everyone must participate, i.e., no one can be allowed to escape if socialism is to "work," resulting in "the improvident, unskilled, and vicious" establishing, i.e., controlling the work environment. When "quality control" moves from making the best product possible to the inclusion of the workers carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment,' "lust" and all that comes with it controls the day, i.e., controls the outcome, pressuring all to participate (or at least tolerate it, looking the other way, 'justifying' it in the minds of those doing it).
"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)
"The workers' council [the consensus meeting] spells the political and economic defeat of reification [the end of limited government, i.e., the end of the father's authority over his home, property, and business]. In the period following the dictatorship [the dictatorship always remains] it will eliminate the bourgeois separation of the legislature, administration and judiciary [which has already taken place in "the workers' council," i.e., the consensus meeting, which is under the influence of the facilitator of 'change, i.e., the despot, who by his method of seduction, deception, and manipulation (suggestology) and support of those who follow him has become legislator, administrator, and judge]." (Lukács)
"It is proposed that no facts or opinion be considered by the Congress [the United Nations council] unless the facts and opinions be the established consensus of a group of collaborators." (Harry Stack Sullivan, The Fusion of Psychiatry and Social Science)
"I've decided to get into the World Federalists, become pro-UN, & the like." "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first―it certainly doesn't amount to much now & won't until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'" "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & cost much blood." ". . . A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.) (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
György Lukács, from whom Vladimir Lenin modeled his 1920 speech, was the founder of the Institute of Social Research which later became known as "the Frankfurt School"—a group of Marxists teaching Marxism in Frankfurt Germany, who, in the early 30's fled from Fascist Germany to America, entering our Universities as professors, assisting our government in making policy (Paul Lazarsfeld, who was a member, assisted James Coleman on earning his PhD. who influenced the Supreme Court on issues of education, i.e., busing, etc.,). Our whole education system is based upon their work, i.e., György Lukács' ideology, i.e., merging psychology and Marxism (both hostile toward the father's/Father's authority), creating what is know as Transformational Marxism, i.e., "group psychotherapy." The NTL's (National Training Laboratories) carried out their work, not only in America but around the world. (Jane Howard, Please Touch: A Guided Tour of the Human Potential Movement)
"As the Frankfurt School [Theodor Adorno, Erick Fromm, Paul Lazarsfeld, etc., including Kurt Lewin, who edited their newspaper] wrestled with how to 'reinvigorate Marx', they 'found the missing link in Freud.'" (Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950)
"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3)
'Change' in teaching method, i.e., "curriculum" is essential for 'change' to be initiated and sustained. Curriculum, i.e., how children are taught is a political system.
"A change in the curriculum is a change in the people concerned—in teachers, in students, in parents ....." "Curriculum change means that the group involved must shift its approval from the old to some new set of reciprocal behavior patterns." "... people involved who were loyal to the older pattern must be helped to transfer their allegiance to the new." "Re-education aims to change the system of values and beliefs [paradigm] of an individual or a group." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)
The agenda is to replace the Patriarchal Paradigm, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system with the Heresiarchal Paradigm of 'change,' i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's natural love of ("lust" for) pleasure and hatred toward restraint—with the "help" of the "vanguard party," i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the "group psychotherapist" (seducing, deceiving, and manipulating the children into participating in the process, 'justifying' their "self," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., their "human nature," turning them against the father's/Father's authority not only in their thoughts only but also in their "relationship," i.e., social actions with one another as well.
"The family is one of these social forms which ... cannot be changed without change in the total social framework." (Max Horkheimer, Kritische Theori)
"... use social-environmental forces to change the parent's behavior toward the child." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
As long as the father/Father, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system receives support from the "community" the process of 'change' cannot be sustained, once initiated. It is therefore imperative that not only crisis is 'created' in the home between the parents and the children and between the parents themselves, but support for the children be used (by professionals) to cut off support for the father in the "community," pressuring the father to 'change,' i.e., abdicate his authority, i.e., his holding his children accountable to his established commands, rules, facts, and truth for the sake of his children's "feelings," i.e., their "lusts," i.e., for the sake of human relationship, i.e., the "community" and its "leaders."
". . . any intervention between parent and child tend to produce familial democracy regardless of its intent." (Warren Bennis, The Temporary Society)
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
Communism, Marxism, Socialism, Globalism, etc., i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the negation of the father's/father's authority is the basis of education today. All "educators" are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies" as their curriculum (method of teaching) in the class. Any teacher questioning or challenging their use, or refusing to use them in the classroom today put their promotion, occupation (in the present and in the future) in jeopardy, receiving the wrath of their "peers" and their "superiors."
"Bloom's Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents." "It was the view of the group that educational objectives stated in the behavior form have their counterparts in the behavior of individuals, observable and describable therefore classifiable [true science is "observable and repeatable," i.e., objective, i.e., constant not "observable and describable," i.e., subject to an opinion, i.e., subject to 'change']." "Only those educational programs which can be specified in terms of intended student behaviors can be classified." "What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction." "… ordering and relating the different kinds of affective behavior." "… we need to provide the range of emotion from neutrality through mild to strong emotion, probably of a positive, but possibly also of a negative, kind." i.e., "the range of emotion(s)" "… organized into value systems and philosophies of life …" "The student must feel free to say he disliked _____ and not have to worry about being punished for his reaction." (Benjamin Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1, Cognitive Domain)
The "Objective" of using "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom, in his own words is to "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents," i.e., to negate (remove) from the curriculum, i.e., from the classroom, i.e., from the minds of the students and the "educator" the father's/Father's authority system and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, so the students and the "educator" can do wrong wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, doing it with each others, i.e., "the group's" approval, i.e., with affirmation., i.e., with impunity.
"In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx)
"We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." (Book 1: Cognitive Domain)
"To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values, the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in many ways is separated from the previous environment in which he was developed." "...many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
Benjamin Bloom's "weltanschauung," i.e., world view (paradigm) was that of two "Transformational" Marxists (Theodor Adorno and Erich Fromm) who merged Marxism and psychology—making it easy to bring Marxism, i.e., hate of the father's/Father's authority into the classroom. One million of "Bloom's Taxonomies" were printed for the Communist Chinese education system back in 1971. (Benjamin Bloom, Forty Year Evaluation) Any teacher questioning/challenging/removing their use in American schools today (public, private, "Christian" schools; pre-school, grade school, high school, college/University, vocational, etc., school) would put their job, i.e., their employment in jeopardy. Benjamin Bloom admitted, forty years after the publication of his first "Taxonomy," Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1, Cognitive Domain, "Certainly the Taxonomy was unproved at the time it was developed and may well be 'unprovable.'" (Benjamin Bloom, Forty Year Evaluation) In the second "Taxonomy," Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 2, Affective Domain Benjamin Bloom wrote: "Whether or not the classification scheme presented in Handbook I: Cognitive Domain is a true taxonomy is still far from clear." After all it was about putting "theory," i.e., the children's opinions ("feelings") into "practice," negating any command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority that got in the way.
"The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box' [a "box" full of evils, which once opened, can not be closed].' It is in this 'box' that the most influential controls are to be found." "In fact, a large part of what we call "good teaching" is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the student's fixed beliefs and getting them to discuss issues." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
"We are not entirely sure that opening our 'box' is necessarily a good thing; we are certain that it is not likely to be a source of peace and harmony among the members of a school staff." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
Those using "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom have only one agenda (despite what they might think or say), the negation of the father's/Father's authority in the students thoughts and actions, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with "the groups" affirmation. There is no respect for dad, i.e., the office he occupies in the home today, mostly due to the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," i.e., Marxism, i.e., psychology in the classroom with "educators," i.e., facilitators of 'change,' i.e., group psychotherapists leading the way. By removing the father's/Father's authority, i.e., accountability for being or doing wrong from the classroom "lust" prevails, negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., capitalism (capitulation) in the student's thoughts and actions.
"If the school does not claim the authority to distinguish between science and religion, it loses control of the curriculum and surrenders it to the will of the electorate." (Society as Educator in an Age of Transition, Ed. Kenneth Benne, Eighty-sixth Year of the National Society for the Study of Education.)
By using the "scientific method," i.e., "behavior science" in education, the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "religion" is removed from the classroom, i.e., from the child's learning experience, allowing "educators," i.e., facilitators of 'change' to take over "the will of the electorate."
"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers)
The "educator" (facilitator of 'change') does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restraint, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student.
"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students [those students who adhere to the father's/Father's authority] that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
The use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," i.e., Marxist-psychological programming in the classroom (since the 50's and 60's) has been Mao's long march across America, 'liberating' children from their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., "rule of law."
"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [Nationalism]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost [Globalists]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
"In a democratic society a patriarchal culture should make us depressed instead of glad; it [the father's/Father's authority] is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization." (Maslow, Management)
"Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [an environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Maslow, Journals)
"According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle ["lust," "enjoyment," dopamine emancipation]." "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the carnal nature of the child]; the foundation has to be recovered ['liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]. " "The individual is emancipated in the social group." "I wagered my intellectual life on the idea of finding in Freud what was missing in Marx." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
"In October, 1919, Lenin called upon Ivan Pavlov in Petrograd, for the answer to the question: 'How can human behavior be controlled?' As a result of this meeting, Pavlov's research laboratories became out of bounds for even the super-powerful Soviet Cheka. Pavlov and his disciples were able to exercise complete freedom in their experiments [laboratories] to fulfill Lenin's dream of standardizing the Russian people by destroying their individualism through education using Pavlov's mind-conditioning techniques [Boris Sokoloff, The White Night—Pages from a Russian Doctor's Notebook]." (Gene Birkeland (pen name Ellen McClay), in her article "Deliver Us From Evil—Is there a 'new morality' displacing the old in America?" 1959)
"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." A "hierarchy of leaders has to be trained which reach out into all essential sub-parts of the group." "Hitler himself has obviously followed very carefully such a procedure." "The democratic procedure [Marxist's] will have to be as thorough and as solidly based on group organization." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Bennie, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"The effectiveness of this new set of environmental conditions is probably related to the extent to which the students are 'isolated' from the home during this period of time [a key component of the brainwashing (re-education) process]." "… objectives can best be attained where the individual is separated from earlier environmental conditions and when he is in association with a group of peers who are changing in much the same direction and who thus tend to reinforce each other." "Coleman (1961) demonstrates very clearly that during the adolescent periods, under some conditions, the peer group has a greater effect on the students than do teachers and, perhaps, parents." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
"One of the most fascinating aspects of group therapy is that everyone is born again, born together in the group." "There is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance [cognitive dissonance]." "Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity." (Yalom)
It is during a "crisis" (which puts people in tension, i.e., a state of willing to compromise in order to resolve it) that 'change' is most easily achieved—with people only noticing the 'change' when it is to late to go back, i.e., un-compromise.
"The eclipse of a way thinking cannot take place without a crisis." (Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks)
"A new emphasis on civic participation and social interaction alone seemed capable of confronting the crisis. And, that is precisely what Fromm provided in his notion of 'communitarian socialism.'" (Bronner)
A commands, rules, facts, and truth based student placed in a dialogue, i.e., "feelings" based, i.e., "lust" 'justifying' environment, which is establishing right and wrong behavior while resolving a crisis, is going to be martyred, i.e., silenced, censored, 'labeled,' persecuted, and rejected, i.e., become an outcast or "converted," i.e., become a part of "the group," 'justifying' (tolerating) "lust." To the world, tolerance, i.e., not judging, i.e., at least not bringing the word "wrong" up, i.e., deliberately "looking the other way" in order to initiate or sustain relationship, 'justifies'—says "What we have in common is 'lust.'"
"In the more traditional society a philosophy of life, a mode of conduct, is spelled out for its members at an early stage in their lives." "A major function of education in such a society is to achieve the internalization of this philosophy." "This is not to suggest that education in an open society does not attempt to develop personal and social values." "It does indeed." "But more than in traditional societies it allows the individual a greater amount of freedom in which to achieve a Weltanschauung1 [world view]." "1Cf. Erich Fromm, 1941; T. W. Adorno et al., 1950 [two Marxist's who were members of the "Frankfurt School" who came to the states, fleeing Fascist Germany in the early 30's—who entered our universities and "assisted" our government in making policy]." (Book 1: Cognitive Domain and Book 2: Affective Domain)
Erich Fromm: "We are proud that in his conduct of life man has become free from external authorities, which tell him what to do and what not to do." "All that matters is that the opportunity for genuine activity be restored to the individual; that the purposes of society and of his own become identical." (Erich Fromm, Escape from Freedom)
Theodor Adorno: "Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other than to their carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in them—replacing individualism, under God with socialism, i.e., "group feel" aka "group think," the idea being it is "lust" that unites us with the world, the father's/Father's authority that divides us from it]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
"Superego development is conceived as the incorporation of the moral standards of society ["the group" tolerating, i.e., 'justifying' "lust" in order to "get along," i.e., built relationship]. Therefore the levels of the Taxonomy should describe successive levels of goal setting appropriate to superego development." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
"Without exception, [children] enter group therapy [the "group grade" classroom] with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group—their primary family [the traditional home with parents telling their children what they can and can not do]." "What better way to help [the child] recapture the past than to allow him to re-experience and reenact ancient feelings [resentment, hostility] toward parents in his current relationship to the therapist [the facilitator of 'change]? The [facilitator of 'change'] is the living personification of all parental images [takes the place of the parent]. Group [facilitators] refuse to fill the traditional authority role: they do not lead in the ordinary manner, they do not provide answers and solutions [teach right from wrong from established commands, rules, facts, and truth], they urge the group [the children] to explore and to employ its own resources [to dialogue their "feelings," i.e., their desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., their desire for "the group" approval (affirmation)]. The group [children] must feel free to confront the [the facilitator of 'change'], who must not only permit, but encourage, such confrontation [rebellion and anarchy]. He [the child] reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy [brainwashing—washing respect for and fear of the father's/Father's authority from the child's brain (thoughts)] is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role [submitting to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will] he once occupied. … the patient [the child] changes the past by reconstituting it ['creating' a "new" world order from his "ought," i.e., a world "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., a world void of the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating]." (Yalom)
| A facts based student placed in a "feelings" base classroom is going to be martyred. |
If someone, through dialogue, can 'discover' what you "lust" after, i.e., what you "covet," i.e., your "self interest, they can, as a charlatan, pedophile, pimp, seduce, deceive, and as one of Thorndike's chickens, Skinner's rats, Pavlov's dog manipulate you into giving your body, mind, spirit, and soul to them to be used by them for their own pleasure and gain, with your approval—then cast you aside when you no longer serve their 'purpose,' i.e., no longer give them pleasure or get rid of you when you get in their way, i.e., cost them time and money and/or refuse to serve, praise, and worship them (doing to you what you did to the father/Father when he/He refused to 'justify' your "lusts," i.e., refused to serve, praise, and worship you, making you "feel" bad, like a sinner, not "good," not like God [only God is good] when you did wrong, disobeyed, sinned). Chickens, rats, and dogs (or any other animal) cannot be told right and wrong behavior. Nor can they tell others what is right and what is wrong behavior. They cannot write books, telling others what to do or read books being told what to do. Only man, made in the image of God can do that. When we make right and wrong behavior subject to dialogue, i.e., to our carnal nature, i.e., to our carnal desires, i.e., to our "lust" of the 'moment' that the world stimulates we become like animals, subject to stimulus-response, i.e., subject to seduction, deception, and manipulation, because we refuse to be told.
"We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." "If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood."
'...we can be more deliberate and hence more successful in our cultural design. We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Rogers) emphasis added.
| The 'moment' the woman in the garden in Eden entered into dialogue with the master facilitator of 'change,' regarding right and wrong behavior, he knew he had her. |
This is what Vladimir Lenin was talking about in 1920, which has now become the law of the land in America, doing what the master facilitator of 'change' did to two "children" in a garden in Eden (Genesis 3:1-6), regarding right and wrong behavior, who through the use of dialogue 'liberating' them from the "Father's" authority, i.e., from the "rule of law" (Hebrews 12:5-11), and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" (Romans 7:14-25), so they could become their "self," i.e., "self-actualized," i.e., "lust-actualized," no longer (in their mind) subject to the Father's authority. It is a process, i.e., a way of thinking that has permeated all of society today, including the "church."
"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works." Matthew 16:24-27
"But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him." Hebrews 11:6 "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Romans 10:17 Faith is in being told. Sight is "sense experienced," i.e., of the world only. If sight, i.e., the "scientific method" is the only means to knowing the truth then faith must be negated. "Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?" Luke 18:8"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8, 9
Question the use of psychology, i.e., the use of dialogue, i.e., men's opinions ("I feel," "I think") in defining God's Word in the "church" today and you will quickly realize how Marxist the "church" has become. Be forewarned: you will be 'labeled,' censored, and martyred (excommunicated without writ) if you bring it up again, i.e., if you persist in warning (reminding) those in the "church" of God's judgment upon them for their sins, i.e., for their "lusts"—needing (daily) to "deny" their "self," i.e., their "lusts," "take up" their "cross," i.e., endure the rejection of men for not affirming their "lusts," and "follow" the Lord (who, by his shed blood on the cross covered their sins, 'redeeming' them from judgment and damnation, imputing his righteousness to them by faith), led by the Holy Spirit, confirming the Word, doing the Father's will.
"To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [i.e., in the child's carnal nature, i.e., in the child's impulses and urges which are being "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority]; the foundation has to be recovered [i.e., the child's carnal nature must be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority if the child is to become his "self" again]." "The repression of normal adult sexuality is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination [the father's/Father's authority]." "Freud, Hegel, ... are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force in order to explain repression." (Brown)
"If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by freedom, then the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.'" "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority over his children]." "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)
When you bring dialogue into the "church," making God's Word subject to men's opinions, i.e., their "lusts" you have to silence, i.e., censor and remove all who hold their "self," you, and the "church," i.e., "the group" accountable to the Word of God, i.e., to doing the Father's will if you want to be your "self," i.e., "self-actualized," i.e., free to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, i.e., a Marxist.
"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21
"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." 2 Corinthians 6:14-18
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9
"And truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3
"He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020