Introduction:
Part 31

The father's/Father's authority system (parental/Godly restraint) engenders a "guilty conscience" in children, making them "feel bad" for doing wrong—in their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with one another—thus (according to those promoting dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., facilitators of 'change') engendering "repression" and "alienation." It is the objective of those promoting dialectic 'reasoning' to 'liberate' the children's natural (carnal) desires of the 'moment,' thus 'liberating' their natural dissatisfaction (resentment or hatred) toward authority, not only in their feelings, thoughts, and actions of the 'moment,' but in the relationship they have with one another as well. It is therefore the praxis of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., "building relationship upon 'Self interest,'" i.e., putting dialectic 'reasoning' (questioning and challenging authority—without having a "guilty conscience," i.e., without "feeling" bad in doing so—with "'group' approval" or "affirmation") into social action (called praxis) that results in unrighteousness and abomination (sinning with impunity) becoming the law of the land (with man serving the laws of the flesh and sin over and therefore against the commands of God—what Immanuel Kant called "lawfulness without law," i.e., the law of the man's carnal nature—concupiscence, i.e., man's natural lust of the flesh and eyes and the pride of life or self will, i.e., sin—'liberated' from the commands or restraints of God, resulting in man loving—lusting after—the pleasures of the 'moment, i.e., himself and the world [that which is "positive"], hating those who preach and teach Godly restraint [those who are "negative"). By removing (negating) the law—which engenders a guilty conscience, man becomes "normal," i.e., of the world, i.e., of the law of his carnal nature only, again., as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life, with the law of sin, i.e., the law of the flesh becoming his master. This is why dialectic 'reasoning' is referred to as "the negation of negation." "No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Luke 16:13 "If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." 1 John 2:15b

No father gives his children commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted as is (by faith) and obeyed and then tells them to 'compromise' them if they get in the way of their initiating and/or sustaining relationship with others and/or the world, i.e., their "self interest" of the 'moment.' The consensus (dialectic) process does just that, "encouraging" children to "set aside" the father's commands, rules, facts, and truth (negate the father's/Father's authority system in their feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with others) in order to "get along" with others, i.e., in order (as in "new" world order) to become at-one-with the world, negating the father's voice in them, i.e., the "guilty conscience" for doing wrong in the process, thus 'liberating' others from the father's commands, rules, facts, and truth by not bringing them up—only bringing them up in contempt, i.e., as something to overcome (negate).

"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them." Colossians 3:5-7