authorityresearch.com

Introduction:
Part 21

    According to dialectic 'logic,' the father's/Father's "top-down" authority system creates neurosis in children—creates a "guilty conscience" in them when they are doing or are thinking about doing what comes natural to them, disobeying or thinking about disobeying their father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth—resulting in children repressing themselves against their own nature which then leads to them preaching and teaching their father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth to one another, defending their father's/Father's position, "prejudicing" themselves against one another, judging one another for doing wrong, making one another "feel bad," i.e., feel guilty, thus alienating themselves from one another. Unless the child is able to freely (safely, i.e., with approval or affirmation) express his feelings and thoughts (his observations or evaluation, i.e., aufheben) through dialogue, what he is doing within himself already, he will remain neurotic, repressed, and alienated.
    According to dialectic 'logic,' only by facilitators of 'change' "helping" children 'justify' their carnal nature, i.e., their impulses and urges of the 'moment, only through children learning to use dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., "self" 'justification,' only by facilitators of 'change' 'creating' a "healthy environment" for children, i.e., a "safe zone," i.e., an "experiential chasm" for children, void of the father's/Father's authority system—where children, through dialogue, i.e., through sharing their opinions (their "thoughts" of the 'moment,' which are taken captive to their "feelings" of the 'moment,' which are stimulated by the situation of the 'moment,' which is manipulated by the facilitator of 'change') with one another without "prejudice," i.e., without insisting upon or defending their father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., without being "negative"—can children find "common ground," i.e., can they through affirmation experience consensus with one another, and putting it into practice, called praxis, be restored to the way they felt, thought, and acted, and related with themselves and the world before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into their lives, learning to relate with one another in the same way, according to their "sensuous needs" and "sense perception" of the 'moment,' i.e., according to that which is "of and for nature Only." "In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence [all that is of the world only]." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest)
    According to dialectic 'logic,' only through children learning to use dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., learning to 'justify' themselves (with one another) through the dialoguing of their opinions to a consensus can the father's/Father's authority system , i.e., the preaching and teaching of commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted as is, i.e., by faith (equated to nationalism, i.e., fascism) be negated in their feelings, thoughts, and actions and in their relationship with one another and the world, negating neurosis, repression, and alienation, i.e., negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, i.e., for disobeying the father/Father, for questioning and challenging the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth, for disrespecting and defying the father's/Father's authority system. Thus, only through children (the next generation of citizens) learning to use dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., 'justifying' themselves as "children of disobedience" and putting it into practice, can they (united as one over and therefore against the father's authority system) create a world (a "new" world order) of Liberté, Equalité, Fraternité, i.e., can they initiate and sustain a world of perpetual 'change,' i.e., a world void of ('liberated' from) parental/Godly restraint, i.e., a world "of and for self," i.e., "of and for" human nature (the child's carnal nature) only, i.e., "of and for" unrighteousness and abomination.

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2016