authorityresearch.com

Introduction:
Part 15

As Karl Marx expressed it: "The life [the power or authority] which he [the child, or in Marx's case the worker] has given to the object [to the father/Father, or to the property or business owner—by obeying him without receiving any personal satisfaction or pleasure from him in the 'moment' as well as without any pleasure coming from the work environment in the 'moment'] sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) In other words, by the child (or worker) doing what he is told to do, against his own will—not in agreement with or counter to his own "self interest"—inhibiting or blocking him from pursuing his desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to restraint, control, discipline, humble, deny himself instead, i.e., having no emotional ("subjective") reward ("ownership") in the project at hand, he (the child) "creates" the father's/Father's "top-down" authority system, i.e., he creates "an alien and hostile force," preventing 'change.' Emotion or the Affective Domain (pleasure, including the pleasure which comes from the approval or affirmation from others) must be a part of the project at hand or the child (or worker) has "capitulated" pleasure (and his carnal/social identity) to a force above (outside) himself, the pleasure of the 'moment' being abdicated to a reward which is to be received some time in the future, requiring faith in (dependence upon) the parent, land or business owner, or God.
If the father's/Father's "top down" authority system, i.e., the pattern of Hebrews 12:5-11 is made the Thesis, i.e., the way it "is," then the child's nature, i.e., his carnal desires of the 'moment' along with his thoughts upon how the world "ought" to be (satisfying his carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., "human nature") becomes the source of conflict and tension, i.e., the Antithesis. With the father's/Father's authority to 1) preach commands and rules (to be obeyed) and teach facts and truth (to be accepted as is, by faith), to 2) "reward" or "bless" the child for doing good, i.e., for doing his/His will, to 3) "chasten" the child for doing wrong or for disobeying, i.e., for not doing his/His will, discussing with his child what he is to do (in greater detail) or what he has done wrong (at the father's/Father's discretion), and to 4) "cast out" the child who rejects his/His authority to do 1-4, a guilty conscience for disobedience, i.e., for doing wrong, i.e., the pattern of Romans 7:14-25 is engendered in the child, preventing 'change,' i.e., preventing Synthesis, i.e., preventing the child from becoming at-one-with the children of the world, i.e., inhibiting or blocking him from becoming subject to the seduction, deception, and manipulation of the facilitator of 'change.' Faith in the father's/Father's authority to chasten or cast out engenders a guilty conscience for doing wrong, i.e., for disobeying, preventing, i.e., inhibits or blocks 'change.' The dialectic system or process goes like this: 1) negate the father's/Father's authority ("right") to chasten or cast out (in the mind of the child) and 2) the guilty conscience for doing wrong or for disobeying is negated, engendering 'change.'