authorityresearch.com

Introduction:
Part 2

Section 27

   The dialectic process (the consensus process) is simply the method used by the first (and master) facilitator of 'change,' "helped" two "children" become "themselves," i.e., "of and for self" and the world only, in the garden in Eden, i.e., Genesis 3:1-6—using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (the formula for 'change') to 'discover' "truth" —"Reasoning" (aufheben) from their "feelings" (desires, "lusts," impulses and urges) of the 'moment,' in the "light" of (stimulated and "illuminated" by) the current situation and the desires it stimulated (with the facilitator of 'change' manipulating the situation by creating a "safe zone," i.e., a "positive" environment for dialogue, i.e. "you will not die"), thus 'justifying' their desires, i.e., pleasures, i.e., "Self" (sight) over and therefore against the "Father's" commands, rules, facts, or truth (faith), putting their desires (love of pleasure and hate of restraint) into action (praxis), negating the "Father's" authority system, i.e., Hebrews 12:5-11—no longer doing right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's will, i.e.., no longer thinking and acting according to the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, or truth—and the guilty conscience for doing wrong, i.e., Romans 7:14-25—disregarding (considering as irrational and therefore irrelevant) their need to ask for forgiveness from the father/Father, repent, and turn from their wicked ways—in the "children's" feelings, thoughts, and actions, and in their relationship with one another and the world, so that they could sin with impunity, i.e., do what they want to do, when they want to do it, with others in consent, without considering the consequence, i.e., without having a sense of judgment or damnation (in their perception), 'justifying' themselves, i.e., their feelings, thoughts, and actions by blaming someone else, i.e., their parents, siblings, spouse, neighbors, society, (with Adam blaming the woman, and the woman blaming the serpent, i.e., the woman being the first environmentalists, i.e., "tree hugger," choosing the pleasure of the tree over God and Adam being the first humanist, choosing the woman, i.e., "human relationship" over God, with both being the first socialists, blaming someone else for their problems), etc., or blaming something else, i.e., the environment, living conditions, lack of support, sleep, food, money, education, etc. for their problems.
    It is the same method (consensus process, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions, i.e., desires and dissatisfactions, i.e., love of pleasure and hate of restraint to a "feeling" of "oneness" with "Self," others, and the world, affirming the child's carnal nature, i.e., what he or she has in common with all that is of the world only—as he or she was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his or her life—engendering socialism-globalism, i.e., common-ism) being used today in our classrooms, town hall meetings, board meetings, socialist gatherings, etc., even in the "church," in the name of "change," , i.e., "Making the world safe for Democracy," i.e., "Building relationship upon Self interest," etc.,. engendering a culture of unrighteousness and abomination, with everyone living in (and for) the 'moment,' thinking and acting according to ("of and for") the flesh, i.e., according to "the law of sin," i.e., according to "human nature"as in the days of Noah.

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2016