Intolerant. by Dean Gotcher

by
Dean Gotcher

"He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22

"Not feeling at home in the sinful world, Critical Criticism must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)

It is in dialogue, i.e., in "Critical Criticism" (where you "set up a sinful world in [your] own home") you 'liberate' your "self" from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., you are "intolerant" of established commands, rules, facts, and truth that get in your way. If the child is still dialoguing with his "self," i.e., murmuring after being chastened (for doing wrong or disobeying) "Critical Criticism," i.e., the Karl Marx in him is still alive, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority for getting in his way. There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, there is only your carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life."

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

When your communication with your "self" and with others (regarding right and wrong behavior) has to be done via dialogue, i.e., how you and the other person is "feeling" and what you and the other person is "thinking" in the 'moment,' that the world, i.e., the current situation and or people are stimulating there is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth standing in your way, "influencing" your and their thoughts and actions. There is only you and them in harmony with the world. That is ALL there is.

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Discussion is indicative of the father's/Father's authority, subject to doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—deductive reasoning.

"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning [that which is "of the world" only]." (ibid.) Dialogue is indicative of the child's carnal nature, loving pleasure and hating restraint, resenting (excluding) any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of his carnal desires of the 'moment,' something that we have in common with one another—inductive reasoning.

In discussion the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth is retained. That is why you, as a child went to dialogue (with your "self" and with others) when you wanted to do what you wanted, when you wanted with no restraint. That is the reason you said "Why?" in response to your father's commands and rules that got in the way of your carnal desires of the 'moment, attempting to draw him into dialogue so you could have your way (with his approval), with him more than likely cutting off dialogue with "Because I said so" or "It is written" in order to retain his/His authority in your thoughts and actions—there are consequences for disobeying. The father, having to, through dialogue respond to the child's "Why?" negates his authority in the child's mind, 'liberating' the child to be his "self," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with the father's affirmation. Changing the method of communication where right and wrong behavior is being decided changes the world the child lives in.

"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)

"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)

When the environment of learning right and wrong behavior consists of 1) preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and discussing any questions you might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the one in authority's discretion, providing he deems it necessary, has time, you are capable of understanding, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority, 2) rewarding you when you do right and obey, 3) chastening you when you do wrong and/or disobey, and 4) grounding you if you question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack authority, the father's/Father's authority remains in place. When dialogue is entered into the mix the father's/Father's authority is drawn into question, i.e., confusion (the fusing of facts and truth and your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires) is set in motion, making facts and truth subject to your "feelings," i.e., to your carnal desires of the 'moment,' negating the father's/father's authority (accountable for your actions) in your thoughts. Once the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth are called into question, in the "light" of your carnal desires of the 'moment,' with others approval, 'justification' of "self," i.e., negation of the father's/Father's authority commences.

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

The "earthly family" and the "Heavenly family" have this one thing in common: those under the father's/Father's authority have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline (capitulate) their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will. Without negating this order (the so called "old" world order) man can not become his "self," i.e., of and for the world only, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (what the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating). In other words in order (as in the so called "new" world order) for you to do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (what the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating) the father's/Father's authority must be negated. Dialogue, when used in establishing right and wrong behavior accomplishes the deed (praxis), negating the father's/Father's authority in your thoughts so you can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., so you can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience—without (in your mind) being held accountable for your deeds.

"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 1 John 2:15

While dad and mom are not perfect, they may be (or may have been) down right tyrants—acting as "selfish" children, using the office of authority they occupy for their own carnal desires (pleasures) only—the office they occupy is perfect, having been given to them by God, who is perfect, in which to serve Him, teaching their children to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" and do right and not wrong according to His established commands, rules, facts, and truth. A father, in the true sense of the word, loves his children while hating their doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, holding them accountable for their actions—chastening them when they do wrong, disobey, sin that they might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" and do right, obey, not sin, grounding them when they reject his authority in order to maintain his authority but not hating them, wanting to kill them as the child does when the father gets in the way of his "lust" for pleasure. When a parent hates his child it is the child in him that is ruling.

"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other then to their carnal desires of the 'moment' and those who 'justify' it]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

It is the fact that children do not have "the love of the Father" in them that those "of and for the world" ("of and for self") seek to gain access to, focusing upon using the children (including those in an adult bodies) for their agenda, i.e., 'liberating' the world of the father's/Father's authority so they can rule the world, i.e., over the children themselves, without having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, removing (silencing, censoring, or even killing) any (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) who get in the way of their "self interest," i.e., their carnal desires (pleasures, i.e., "lusts") of the 'moment,' that the world stimulates, claiming they are doing it for the "good" of "the people," i.e., for "worldly peace and socialist harmony," when in reality ("actually") it is for their "self." We can all sympathize with the child being chastened (for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning), but without it all the child learns is that his carnal desires (the pleasure, i.e., his "lusts") of the 'moment' (the Karl Marx in him) that the world stimulates is all that life is about, i.e., is all there "is."

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words, according to Karl Marx, et al. "lust reconciles you to the world," i.e., only when you are 'liberated' from having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline (capitulate) your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will can you become your "self," as you "is," "of and for 'self' and the world only," i.e., "self-actualized." Money (stored up pleasure), i.e., capital comes in here as when the father controls it "lust" is restrained but when the children have access to it "lust" leads the way.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), i.e., "of and for self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common, i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers, on becoming a person) In this way, i.e. through therapy "self" is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority (system).

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process the father's/Father's authority is "washed" from your thoughts, 'liberating' you from the father's/Father's authority so you can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, negating all who get in your way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous, with "the groups" approval (affirmation), i.e., with impunity. Unlike discussion where you must suspend, as upon a cross your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in order to hear and receive the truth, maintaining the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, in dialogue you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority that stands in the way of initiating and/or sustaining "relationships," 'justifying' your and the other persons' "lusts," i.e., your and their carnal pleasures, i.e., your and their "self interests" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating.

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8, 9

Without the Father there is no Son. Without the Son, sent by the Father there is no salvation, i.e., 'redemption.' Without the Father raising the Son from the grave there is no 'reconciliation.' Without the Father and the Son there is no gospel message, i.e., good news, there is only you, dying in you sins. The dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process 'redeems' you from the Father's authority, 'reconciling' you to the world only, so you can die in your sin, spending eternity with the master facilitator of 'change' in a lake of fire that is never quenched, which was prepared for him and his followers (including you if you, rejecting the Father's authority, follow him).

"[E]very one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Your heart is deceitful in that it perceives pleasure, i.e., "lust" as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will and wicked, i.e., "desperately wicked" in that it hates anyone or anything that gets in its way, i.e., that does not support ('justify') its "lust" for pleasure and its hatred toward restraint. You can not see the wickedness of your heart since your love of ("lusting" after) pleasure, i.e., "self," i.e., your "self interest" is standing in the way.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:28-32

The world has embraced dialogue as its only means of communication (making all discussion subject to opinions, making all commands, rules, facts, and truth subject to your "feelings" and "thoughts," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment') in order to "know" the 'truth,' 'liberating' you from the father's/Father's authority (from that which is "negative," i.e., from accountability for your carnal thoughts and carnal actions, i.e., from "Ye shalt surely die") so you can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating (do that which is "positive," i.e., doing what you want to do, when you want do it with 'justification' i.e., affirmation from others, i.e., with "Thou shalt not surely die") without having a guilty conscience, negating (not caring what happens to) all who get in your way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous, doing so with impunity, following after the "anti-Christ," i.e., the master facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the master psychotherapist who made his first appearance in a garden in Eden, 'liberating' two "children" from the "Father's" authority, doing the same today with you. When you "tolerate ambiguity," i.e., dialogue with your "self" and with others regarding right and wrong behavior you are "intolerant of any influence from without," i.e., intolerant of those who get in the way of your "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, which includes your "lust" for approval from others affirming your "lusts," which is "the pride of life."

"Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee." Psalms 119:11

"But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." Matthew 4:4

"O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6

The spirit of "anti-Christ" can only rule in your heart when you negate the Father's authority in your thoughts, seeking man's approval instead. "What can I get out of this situation/person for my 'self'"—in order to satisfy your "lusts"—leads to "What will happen to me if they reject me," i.e., the fear of man—"lust" and "self preservation" are the hallmarks of a beast. Unless you 1) deny your "self," i.e., your "lusts" (not walk by them but walk away from them, the scriptures say "flee"), 2) are willing to endure being rejected by others for not 'justifying' (affirming) their "lusts," and 3) follow Jesus, doing the Father's will, all you have is your "self" and the world—which is willing to negate you if/when you get in the way of its "lusts," doing to you what you do to others when they get in your way. If you have "the love of the Father" in you, you love them, hating what they do otherwise you have "the love of the world," i.e., "lust" in you, hating them, wanting to get rid of them no matter what it takes.

"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels." Luke 9:23-26

"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." Ephesians 2:2,3

In the "new" world order, being subject to Karl Marx's ideology, i.e., the carnal nature of the child the anti-Christ ("intolerant of any influence from without") will rule, negating the father's/Father's authority so he, along with all the world can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, negating anyone who gets in his way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous without having a guilty conscience, with impunity. In a world which determines right and wrong behavior via dialogue, i.e., via "feelings," anyone attempting to determine right and wrong behavior via a true discussion (via established commands, rules, facts, and truth) becomes the source of "controversy," therefore labeled as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' a resister of 'change,' not a "team player," a "lower order thinker," in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, a racist, a fascist, a dictator, anti-social, etc., needing therapy in order to become "normal"—the "norm" being "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., dialogue which is "intolerant" of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., discussion (where the father/Father has the final say).

"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Luke 16:13

"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12