Compromise.
(Personal note.)
by
Dean Gotcher
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
"From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts." James 4:1-3
"[We] must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions [who see those people who adhere to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., who adhere to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., rule of law (that inhibits or blocks "human nature," i.e., that "gets in the way" of or prevents the "building of relationships upon common self interests," i.e., lusts), i.e., who refuse to compromise] in joint deliberations [in the consensus process] as a vice rather than a virtue." (Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change) Majority vote adheres to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., to rule of law (you retain your private convictions—fear of being or doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, being held accountable for it, i.e., fear of God, being held accountable by Him—and the right to hold to them, i.e., Him no matter who wins the vote—freedom of the conscience) while the consensus process negates it (you must compromise, i.e., set aside your private convictions, abdicating your right to hold them in order to initiate and sustain relationship with the people in the room making policy, i.e., in order to enjoy the carnal pleasures, i.e., lusts of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, which includes the fear of man, being held accountable to him [collectively, i.e., "the group"] for getting in the way of his lusts—freedom from the conscience). Like yeast, a little compromise (when it comes to right and wrong behavior) goes a long ways, i.e., has no end until all are participating, i.e., all have embraced (tolerated) it—all must participate. When it comes to right and wrong, according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth,, you never compromise in order to do things right (if you considered it right you would not be compromising), you compromise in order to negate wrong, i.e., negate you and/or the other person thinking you and/or they are doing things wrong.
"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not think he knows it better than others, that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly [replacing wrong, i.e., accountability for doing wrong according established commands, rules, facts, and truth with "badly," i.e., an opinion, i.e., just do things "better" the next time, whatever that means at the time] and he is interested only in what they have done right [that initiates and sustains lust], then peace and affirmation [worldly peace, i.e., peace to the flesh, i.e., lust and approval, i.e., 'justification' by men (to lust), i.e., lust and all that is of the world that stimulates ('justifies') lust] have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel, in Carl Friedrich, The Philosophy of Hegel)
The father's/Father's authority (Patriarchal paradigm, which is initiated and/or sustained in traditional education) is based upon no compromise (when it comes to right and wrong behavior, i.e., obeying established commands and rules and accepting and applying established facts and truth), with the father/Father (or traditional teacher)
1) preaching established commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and discussing any question(s) the children might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the father's/Father's discretion, i.e., providing he/He deems it necessary, has time, the children are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his/His authority (with the father/Father having the final say: "Because I said so."/"It is written."), 2) rewarding the children who do right and obey, 3) correcting and/or chastening the child who does wrong and/or disobeys, that he might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Fathers' will, and 4) casting out (expelling, grounding) any child who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, attacks his/His authority.
With the intent of negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., removing it from the thoughts and actions of the children—directing effecting (changing their paradigm) how they feel about, what they think about, and how they respond to their self, others, the world, and authority (the father's/Father's authority), i.e., their 'loyalty' being to lust, and the people supporting (affirming) it instead of to the father/Father and his/His authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth that get in the way of their lusts of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—Theodor Adorno (a Marxist, who make the 'drive' of life the building of relationship upon the carnal pleasures, i.e., lusts , i.e., self interests of the 'moment,' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, engendering socialism, making the 'purpose' of life the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the negation of individualism, under God in the individuals thoughts and actions, requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority in society) summed up the father's/Father's authority this way (what he called "authoritarian," i.e., "our problem"):
"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining, capitulating your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority [like Karl Marx, Adorno believed the child 'created' God in the image of his father when he humbled, denied, died to, controlled, disciplined, capitulated his "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, sacrificing his lusts to the father's/Father's authority ("The life which he has given to the object sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force." Karl Marx, MEGA I/3), thus the need to negate the father's/Father's authority in the mind and in the actions of the child, i.e., "the people"—by removing the father/Father (the father's/Father's authority) from society, i.e., from any group establishing policy and/or making law, i.e., determining right and wrong behavior]." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account [thus, in error correlating the father's/Father's authority to Fascism, he "prejudiced" himself and those who follow him against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the Patriarchal paradigm—against the fact that black is black and white is white and two plus two always equals four (and can not be any other number)]." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., i.e., from having to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other then to their carnal desires, i.e., their lusts of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and those 'justifying' (affirming) them, i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the Marxist leader—"In a democratic society a patriarchal culture should make us depressed instead of glad; it [the father's/Father's authority] is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality) The error in Theodor Adorno's 'logic' is all forms of socialism, including Fascism must negate the father's/Father's authority in order to initiate and sustain control over "the people." Fascism is only an offshoot of Communism, making race an issue instead of "human nature." Both reject individualism, under God, i.e., the Father's authority. The agenda, according to Adorno, is to "use social-environmental forces [manipulation, i.e., lust and fear] to change the parent's behavior toward the child." ibid. When you use "feelings," i.e., lust for pleasure ("What can I get out of this situation and/or person for my self?") as a means to 'change,' fear ("What is going to happen to me?") rules over your life, negating facts and truth, i.e., what really is, i.e., stability/certainty.
"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making [the father's/Father's authority, i.e., rule of law, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth] our objective centers upon transforming public opinion ["feelings," i.e., stimulus-response, i.e., love of pleasure (lust) and hate of restraint (resentment toward the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way" of lust)] into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus [determining right and wrong behavior based upon your and the other person's "feelings," i.e., upon your and their common self interest, i.e., upon your and their lusts which are being stimulated by the current situation and/or people present in a meeting, which is setting policy and/or making law (determining right and wrong behavior)] is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps [negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth when determining right and wrong behavior, i.e., when making policy and/or law]." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)
"Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) Karl Marx, by simply redefined "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which is "of the world," as "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience," i.e., that which "only" "proceeds from Nature" (which is the basis of Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of "felt" needs, that all students in college have to learn and apply in their lives, i.e., in their private thoughts and public actions) was able (as Sigmund Freud) to make all who come under "scientific" evaluation (aufheben), i.e., "behavior science," i.e., Marxism subject only to the world, i.e., to stimulus-response, i.e., subject to the impulses and urges it stimulates, i.e., subject to the facilitator of 'change'—manipulating the environment (determining what is the "appropriate" and "inappropriate" information to be "discussed" in the meeting, appropriate information being information that is "positive" to the flesh, i.e., that "tolerates"/'justifies' lust, initiating and sustaining 'change' and inappropriate information being information that is "negative" to the flesh, i.e., that condemns/is intolerant of lust, inhibiting, blocking, preventing 'change') in order to arrive at his predetermined outcome that no decision be made outside of a diverse group (which must incorporate, i.e., include the deviant, which makes the outcome subject to the deviant's behavior, i.e., lust for lust and hatred toward restraint, which is stimulated by the world, i.e., by the current situation and/or people present), dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no "top-down decision making," i.e., no father's/Father's authority, i.e., no established command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., no rule of law in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process other than the process itself and the facilitator of 'change' "encouraging" all to participate), over social(ist) issues (which makes all things subject to socialism, i.e., the socialist, i.e., the facilitator of 'change'), in a facilitated meeting (making sure the outcome is a product of, i.e., initiates and sustains the consensus process so he or she, i.e., the facilitator of 'change' can lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without having a guilty conscience, which the father's/Father's authority engenders, with "the groups," i.e., "the people's" affirmation), to a predetermined outcome (that all policy and/or law being made, be made by the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process in a facilitated meeting, negating the father's/Father's authority in setting policy or making law—so the facilitator of 'change,' along with those following him can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (a product of the father's/Father's authority), with "the peoples" affirmation—formerly known as a soviet—"The institutions in socialist society which act as the facilitators between the public and private realms [making the private, i.e., the individual subject to "the people," i.e., the state, i.e., to the facilitators of 'change,' i.e., to the lusts of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating] are the Soviets." Norman Levine, in prefect to György Lukács, Process of Democratization; "Has authority been banished in these later days? Has the world reached a point where it will condone the formation of pupil soviets [the 'group grade' classroom—establishing lust, i.e., the child's carnal nature over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth]?" Will C. Woods, Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California, March 1921, note the date and the state).
"1. All human behavior [man's carnal nature] is directed toward the satisfaction of needs [the satisfaction of lusts], 2. the individual will change his established ways of behaving for one of two reasons: to gain increased need [increased lust] satisfaction or to avoid decreased need satisfaction [avoid missing out on lust], and 3. 'augmentation' ['changing' the environment, i.e., removing the father's/Father's authority] in the possibilities of needs [lust] satisfaction." (Douglas McGregor in Benne) When you make lust your friend you will do whatever it takes to keep it happy. Thinking you control it it in truth controls you. At death, when it comes to where you will spend eternity, eternal life or eternal death, regarding eternal life it has no value, i.e., it has no worth, i.e., it will let you down. "For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" Mark 8:36, 37 Your soul and the Father who judges it, i.e., who determines where you will spend eternity is eternal. Your flesh, i.e., lust and the world that stimulates it is not. After death all you have is the Father, His Son, and those who follow him, in His Glory or the master facilitator of 'change' and all who follow him, in the lake of fire that is never quenched. No matter what you "think" or how you "feel" that is your only two choices. Choice, when it comes to the world are no different than you choosing which room you want to occupy on the Titanic—they are all going the same place.
When you make stimulus-response (for example: when you 1. 'create' a "healthy" environment, according to your/man's definition of "healthy," 2. place a person in it, and, when he "willingly" participates, 3. either a "healthy" person is manifested or is created, i.e., is 'liberated,' i.e., is actualized, otherwise 4) if he refuses to participate or resist he is not a "healthy" person) the basis of right and wrong behavior, as psychologists and Marxists do, who (wanting to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment,' i.e., dopamine emancipation that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—without being held accountable for their thoughts and actions, i.e., without having a guilty conscience) demand compromise (setting aside established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., abdicating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., making law subject to lust, i.e., to "human nature" rather than to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., to absolutes, i.e., to the father's/Father's authority) in order to "get along," i.e., in order to "build relationship" with those who have the same self interests, i.e., lusts, any person, who (holding onto established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., advocating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., rule of law) refuses to compromise is automatically hated, i.e., classified as being neurotic, repressed, alienating, etc., i.e., 'labeled' as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' a resister of 'change,' not a "team player," a lower order thinker, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictator, authoritarian, anti-social, a potential terrorist, unfit, psychological, mentally ill, etc., i.e., "the problem," needing therapy (to participate in a situation ethics, values clarification, i.e., an open-ended, non-directive, i.e., a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus environment), i.e., needing to be either converted or silenced, censored, and removed (from having any influence upon others, i.e., "the group," i.e., society) for the "good" (lusts) of "the group," i.e., for the "good" (lusts) of "the people," i.e., for the "good" (lusts) of the therapist (as the therapist, i.e., the facilitator of 'change' perceives his self as being the personification of "the people," who, like him lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating and hate restraint—and therefore the restrainer, i.e., the father's/Father's authority for "getting in their way"). Anyone holding onto absolutes, i.e., onto the father's/Father's authority, i.e., onto established commands, rules, facts, and truth in a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (facilitated), i.e., stimulus-response meeting is going to be silenced and/or removed, i.e., censored and/or martyred. Considering that all college students have to go through this process in their classes (their college experience) it is no wonder they come out of college as 'liberals,' i.e., socialists, i.e., Marxists—lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority (college is now "party time" and "political action time" against authority). The same being true for your legislators in government (making law subject to their lusts, i.e., to their self interests). Rejecting God, i.e., the Father's authority (accountability for their thoughts and actions), when it comes to right and wrong behavior, all they have is "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., self , i.e., lust being 'justified,' affirmed by those they are "hanging around with," i.e., who they are "building relationship" with. Compromise, i.e., their self interest, i.e., lust is now the law of the land, negating your God given, unalienable rights, which you sent them to re-present. The same being true in the classroom, the workplace, and even in the "church"—doing their will instead of God's (even doing it in "the name of the Lord"—"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." Matthew 7:21-23). "Draw me not away with the wicked, and with the workers of iniquity, which speak peace to their neighbours, but mischief [lust] is in their hearts." Psalms 28:3
"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16
Whoever defines terms for you controls your life (determines what is right and what is wrong behavior, i.e., where you will spend eternity). God's Word ("It is written"), i.e., the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ, i.e., that which is from above—eternal life. Man's words (opinions), i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," "i.e., that which is "of the world"—eternal death. The flesh sides with that which is below, i.e., lust. The soul is subject to that which is above, i.e., the Father's authority. Who you listen to (who defines terms for you) has eternal consequence. Compromise, when it comes to right and wrong behavior is not the language of that which is above (righteousness). It is the language of that which is below (for the sake of lust, i.e., sensuousness, i.e., the here-and-now, i.e., the "eternal present," i.e., self interest which is passing away). To KNOW right from wrong behavior comes from above, from being told. When you compromise (in order to "get along," i.e., in order to get what you want, i.e., in order to satisfy your lusts, i.e., your self interests) you do not KNOW (other than you are wrong), you only "think" or "feel" according to the flesh ('justifying' the flesh), sacrificing your soul to the carnal pleasures (lusts) of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—which includes the approval, i.e., affirmation (praises) of men.
"[I]t is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23
"[E]very one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12
"But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment." Matthew 12:36
"Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment." Ecclesiastes 11:9, 10
No compromise is the result of having been told (right from wrong behavior), i.e., is a result of the father's/Father's authority—having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate your self in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's (the author's) established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which engenders a guilty conscience in you when you are doing, are thinking about doing, or have done wrong, disobeyed, sinned, i.e., have lusted after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, in disobedience. Romans 7:14-25 Compromise (regarding right and wrong behavior) is the result of you wanting your way, i.e., wanting to satisfy your lusts, which includes the approval (affirmation) of men. Compromise (when it comes to right and wrong behavior) is indicative of your carnal nature, i.e., of your lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people are stimulating. No compromise (when it comes to right and wrong behavior), on the other hand is indicative of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., of you doing the father's/Father's will.
"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50
"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11
"Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth." Ephesians 6:1-3
"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:5
The gospel message is based upon the Father's authority, with the Son (and those following him) doing His Father's will, i.e., no compromise. Mercy and grace are not based upon compromise but upon your repentance before the Father and the Father's love for you—"O give thanks unto the LORD; for he is good; for his mercy endureth for ever." 1 Chronicles 16:34.
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9
"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3
"He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:22
"... for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ." Galatians 1:10
"And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the inheritance; for ye serve the Lord Jesus Christ." Colossians 3:23-24
"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself [flee his lusts], and take up his cross [endure the rejection of men for not affirming their lusts], and follow me [doing the Father's will]. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works." Matthew 16:24-27
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." 2 Corinthians 6:14-18
"[T]he friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." James 4:4
The law (of God) can save no one. It simply reveals the perfect will of God, the Father and man's sinful nature, i.e., his "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "pride of life." No "good" work a man does can save him, nor no evil work he does can prevent him from being saved (providing he repents and turns from his wicked ways, i.e., gives his life to the Lord, by faith doing the Father's will).
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God; not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians. 2:8, 9
By making stimulus-response the basis of life, which all the laws of nature (established by God) abide by (for every action there is an equal reaction) man becomes a material object, i.e., only of the world. Applying the method of science to men, women, and children can only have this outcome (stimulus-response). Therefore when a person does not respond "correctly" in a "healthy" environment (requiring compromise in order to "get along," i.e., in order to become his self, as well as "build relationship" with others) he is automatically classified/'labeled' as being mentally "unhealthy," needing therapy. Anyone external to "human nature," i.e., to lust and the world that stimulates lust then becomes the source/cause of mental illness (neurosis, repression, alienation, etc.,), preventing the person from become his self, i.e., self actualized, i.e., of the world only. Lust (unrighteousness) then becomes the basis of normal behavior, i.e., becomes the "norm," negating the father's/Father's authority—in the process negating the guilty conscience the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in disobedience to the father/Father (which is the main objective). When you are silent (or silenced) in an unrighteous (stimulus-response), i.e., lust 'justifying' environment, unrighteousness (stimulus-response), i.e., lust becomes the "norm."
"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24
"Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" Romans 6:16
You can only have one or the other, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" or the father's/Father's authority. What you have in common with others is "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life." What you have in common with God (being made in the image of God), i.e., the Father, His Son, and the Holy Ghost is the desire (of your soul) to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which you have been told—needing to hear and have faith in (receive) the Word of God, deny the flesh, i.e., your lusts, accept the rejection of others (for not affirming their flesh, i.e., their lusts), follow the Son, be filled with and empowered by the Holy Ghost, doing the Father's will.
"And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst." John 6:35 "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. I am that bread of life." John 6:47, 48 "He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water." John 7:38 "Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me." John 12:44
The soul KNOWS by being told. The flesh knows by stimulus-response, i.e., "sense experience." The earthly father is included in the father's/Father's authority as both the Heavenly Father (who is perfect) and the earthly father (who is not perfect) are the same paradigm (Patriarchal paradigm) requiring their children to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self in order to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will. While the earthly father is not perfect, he might be an absolute tyrant (or MIA/AWL), his office of authority is perfect, having been given to him by God, who is perfect, in order to do his will (besides providing food, clothing, and a roof over their heads, training his children up in the admonition of the Lord and teaching them how to "pull weeds," i.e., work).
Compromise - no compromise (when it comes to behavior) is made manifest in our communication with one another (language; body language and spoken language). Discussion (willing/wanting to know right from wrong behavior by being told, i.e., persuasion) manifests no compromise (either the other person is right and not wrong or you are right and not wrong, there is no middle ground). Dialogue (resentment/hostility/hatred toward being told right from wrong behavior) manifests compromise (setting aside "wrong" for the 'moment' in order to "get along," i.e., in order to get what you want, i.e., what you are lusting after). In discussion change is only through persuasion, i.e., "What is the right (and not wrong) thing to do?" (according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which the person has accepted as is). There is a wrong, i.e., accountability for being/doing wrong in discussion. In dialogue 'change' (response) is only through "feelings," i.e., self interests, i.e., lusts which are being stimulated by the world, i.e., by the current situation or people present (imagined or real). There is no wrong, i.e., no accountability for being/doing wrong, according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth in dialogue (as there are no absolutes, i.e., no established command, rule, fact, or truth—other than your "feelings" of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world—everything is an opinion, i.e., a theory, making everything readily adaptable to 'change' according to your lusts). There is only a need to do things "better" the next time if you get caught doing wrong (when things go wrong), i.e., don't get caught, if caught blame someone else or the situation (after all it is stimulus-response, i.e., it's not your fault—this makes the perpetrator of a crime, i.e., the criminal a victim, having been accused of doing wrong, and the victim of the crime the perpetrator, i.e., the criminal, blaming the other person for doing wrong, turning evil/disobedience/lust into good and good/obedience/doing the father's/Father's will into evil). The only wrong in dialogue is insisting upon established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., upon doing the father's/Father's will, requiring the other person do right and not wrong according to the same standards which conflict with "human nature," i.e., which get in the way of their lusts, i.e., having to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth which inhibit or block 'change,' i.e., which condemn compromise (thus making the person feel "bad," i.e., wicked, i.e., like a sinner), i.e., which cuts off dialogue., i.e., inhibits or blocks, i.e., prevents "the building relationship with others based upon common self interests (lusts)." The 'liberal' is never wrong, only needing to do things "better" the next time (if caught). The conservative is always wrong, believing in right and wrong, i.e., refusing to compromise.
"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Discussion divides upon being right and not wrong, i.e., knowing, which is formal, i.e., judgmental.
"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) Dialogue unites upon "feelings," i.e., "I feel" and/or "I think," i.e., an opinion, which is informal, i.e., non-judgmental.
In discussion God is God, like your father having the final say, i.e., "Because I said so." "It is written." cutting off dialogue, i.e., you being God. In dialogue, you and the other person are God, having the final say according to your and their carnal nature, i.e., your and their self interests, i.e., your and their lusts of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating (there is no "wrong" in dialogue, everyone is entitled to their opinion—the problem being when their opinion becomes the law, i.e., is put into praxis everything is 'changed,' there are no longer absolutes, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., rule of law, there is only the process of 'change,' i.e., their lust of the 'moment' and the world that stimulates it, i.e., that is ever 'changing').
"The philosophy of praxis [putting men's opinions, i.e., theory into practice] is the absolute secularization of thought, an absolute humanism of history." (Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks)
"In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx)
This is now reflected in education, i.e., in the "group grade" classroom (where the student's "feelings" toward the father's/Father's authority and lust , i.e., "human nature" are graded—adherence to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., holding to absolutes, i.e., refusing to compromise [in order to build relationships] results in a bad grade, 'justification' of lust , i.e., being "tolerant of ambiguity," i.e., compromising [in order to build relationships] results in a good grade).
"We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." (Benjamin Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objective, Book 1: Cognitive Domain)
"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself [one's lust] in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)
"Group members must be able to synthesize individual 'felt' needs [lusts] with common group 'felt' needs [lusts]." (Warren Bennis, The Temporary Society)
"Only when the immediate interests [lusts] are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary," (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)
"The revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life, which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the fathers, including those who adhere to the father's/Father's authority]." (Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest)
The soul, i.e., man made in the image of God, KNOWS by being told. The flesh by "sense experience," i.e., by stimulus-response (and impulses and urges). No animal can read or write a book, i.e., be told or tell others what is right and what is wrong behavior. Only man, made in the image of God can do that. God, after creating Adam told him what was right and what was wrong behavior, i.e., told him what he could and could not do. It was when the Serpent (the master facilitator of 'change,' who through the use of neurolinguistics, i.e., an embedded statement in a question which elicits subconscious carnal desire) got the woman into dialogue (revealing her "feelings," i.e., her carnal desire, i.e., her lust to "touch" "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil") that he knew he "owned" her, with Adam following (her). After Adam's admitted his nakedness before God, after disobeying ("compromising" for the sake of relationship with, i.e., lust for the woman), God's response was "Who told you?" Adam and the woman then revealed their conversion to liberalism—refusing to admit they were wrong they blamed someone else, Adam the woman (and God since he created her) and the woman the Serpent (the master facilitator of 'change'). Genesis 3:1-6
"Laws must not fetter human life ["the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life"]; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities of the people change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') Any time Karl Marx, et al. said "the people" they meant their self—perceiving their self as being the personification of "the people." The same is true today. Any time a facilitator says "It is not about you," when you question what he is doing he is really saying "It is all about me." (although he, being deceived and/or wanting to deceive you would deny it, i.e., be "offended," his nakedness, i.e., evil intent being exposed).
"Not feeling at home in the sinful world. Critical Criticism must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family) In other words: "Not feeling comfortable in a world that calls me a sinner, by dialoguing with my self, i.e., 'justifying' my lusts and putting my lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint into action I am able to create a world made in my image 'intolerant of any influence from without,' i.e., a world void of the father's/Father's authority."
"We are proud that in his conduct of life man has become free from external authorities, which tell him what to do and what not to do." "All that matters is that the opportunity for genuine activity be restored to the individual; that the purposes of society and of his own become identical." "... to give up 'God' and to establish a concept of man as a being ... who can feel at home in it [the world], if he achieves union with his fellow man and with nature." (Erick Fromm, Escape from Freedom)
In dialogue, compromise, i.e., "tolerance" for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is mandatory. In a discussion there is no compromise, i.e., you are right and the other person is wrong or visa versa (according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth which you and the other person have accepted as "Is"—having been told, i.e., having been preached or taught, i.e., persuaded [knowing] in your self as being right or true). Placing a person who wants to dialogue his opinion, i.e., his "feelings" (regarding right and wrong behavior—based upon his carnal desires, i.e., his self interest, i.e., his lusts of the 'moment') in an environment requiring discussion (doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth) requires him to take a position, i.e., enter into discussion (regarding right and wrong behavior) or be silent. Conversely, placing a person who wants to discuss right and wrong behavior (based upon established commands, rules, facts, and truth) in an environment requiring dialogue, requires him to take part in dialogue (making his "feelings," i.e., his carnal desires, i.e., his self interest, i.e., his lusts of the 'moment' the bases from which to determine right and wrong behavior) or be silent. It is one or the other. Merging the two simply pushes all participants to one side or the other or leaves them in a state of confusion, i.e., cognitive dissonance (attempting to merge the two, "feelings" and facts which does not work). You have to choose one or the other or deceive yourself into believing you can turn dialogue into discussion, making discussion subject to dialogue, i.e., turning your "feelings" into facts, making all things around you subject to your "feelings," i.e., to your lusts, i.e., to your carnal desires, i.e., to your self interest of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, i.e., subject to dialogue., i.e., to opinions (theory) only.
"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8, 9
"Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." James 1:17
"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." Matthew 5:48
God rejects compromise. The carnal mind demands it. Those advocating stimulus-response and instinct (urges and impulse; libido) as the basis of behavior refuse to recognize they can read and write books, i.e., that they can be told and tell others what is right and what is wrong behavior. Deceiving their self as well as all who listen to and follow after them (in defiance to the father's/Father's authority) their agenda is to 'justify' their self, i.e., their lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, with the "the peoples" (your) affirmation.
"Prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)
"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not think he knows it better than others [when he no longer hold himself and others accountable to absolutes, i.e., to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., to the father's/Father's authority], that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly [he is no longer concerned about what they have done that is wrong] and he is interested only in what they have done right [according to the flesh in response to the world, i.e., in response to the current situation and/or people who are stimulating it], then peace [to the flesh] and affirmation ['justification' by others] have come to him [i.e., the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders is negated in his thoughts, i.e., in his "feelings" as well as in his actions, i.e., in his relationship with others ("there is no fear of God before his face")]." (G. F. W. Hegel, in Carl Friedrich, The Philosophy of Hegel)
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9
Your heart is "deceitful ("deceitful above all things") thinking pleasure, i.e., "lust" is the 'purpose' of life instead of doing the father's/Father's will, making you wicked ("desperately wicked") in your effort to negate the father's/Father's authority that gets in your way. You can not see your heart as being wicked because your "lust" for pleasure (your "lust" for "lust") is standing in the way. Karl Marx is in your heart, waiting for you to 'justify' him, i.e., your "self" over and therefore against having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in the "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, so you can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so you can become like him, i.e., become "self actualized." "Lust" blinds you to the consequence (cost) of "lusting" after pleasure, i.e., loosing your soul.
"Despotism ... predominates in the human heart." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
Even the first President of the U.S.A understood "the human heart" and its effect upon government, i.e., why there was a need to break government up into different departments (branches), limiting the effect of the politicians heart over the citizens, preventing "despotism."
"If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation [by those in one branch of government usurping power (control) over another]; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed." (George Washington, Farewell Address)
Unlike any government on earth our framing fathers made the citizen the King by limiting the power of government, making local control the basis of government. Local control begins with the father's authority in the home, establishing a do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth paradigm in the next generation of citizens (and politicians). Private convictions (freedom of the conscience, speech, religion, etc.,), private property, private business, etc., all come from local control, i.e., the father's authority over his family, under God (the giver of unalienable rights, i.e., rights no man can put a lean on). The citizen, i.e., the constituent then becomes the father (the King) and the representative (who is sent to re-present the father, i.e., the constituent in government) becomes as a child sent to the store to purchase his father's goods, with the father's money (taxation). If the child, i.e., the re-presentative spends the father's money on himself, i.e., to satisfy his and his "friends" self interest, i.e., his and their lusts he is no longer sent to the store, another child. who will re-present the father (the constituents) is sent in his place instead. If the child (instead of insisting upon majority vote, thus retaining the father's authority, i.e., local control) makes the consensus process (his self interests, i.e., his lusts which he has in common with the other children in the room, i.e., in government) his means to establishing law he usurps the father's authority, i.e., local control. Then, using the father's credit card he is able to put the father (citizens) into debt, making the father (the citizens) his servant for the rest of his (their) life. In a free government you send your representative to re-present (protect) your principles (rights), not to compromise (negate) them. The consensus process is able to bypasses (negate) limited government by making the means of establishing policy and law (in all branches) subject to the self interests, i.e., the lusts of those in government, making all laws subject to their and their "friends" self interests, i.e., their and their "friends" lusts, usurping the rights of the citizens, i.e., local control, i.e., limited government, i.e., rule of law. Civil government does not require compromise. You and the other person can refuse to compromise and yet be civil—which is the definition of civil government.
In fact the American Dream (why people came to America from despotic nations) is based upon you recognizing and respecting your neighbors rights, i.e., their right of private conviction, private family, private property, private business, etc., not infringing upon their rights as they recognized and respected your rights, i.e., your right of private conviction, private family, private property, private business, etc., not infringing upon your rights. The same applied to the citizens and government. Once those rights are infringed upon, i.e., people come here illegally and those in government make you subject to their self interests, i.e., their lusts, as a despot usurping your rights, using your tax dollars to satisfy their self interests, i.e., their lusts (taxation without representation, i.e., no longer re-presenting you, i.e., no longer recognizing and respecting your rights, using that which is yours for their self, i.e., to satisfy their lusts instead), the American Dream, i.e., your (and their) right of private conviction, private family, private property, private business, etc., i.e., rule of law (restraint) is gone, i.e., is negated, despotism prevails.
Those who advocate compromise (regarding behavior), i.e., those who want no restraint upon their carnal desires, i.e., their self interests, i.e., their lusts of the 'moment' that are being stimulated by the world, seek to negate limited government, i.e., local control, i.e., the father's/Father's authority over his children—establishing in them a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—so they can do wrong, disobey sin, i.e., so they can lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with "the peoples," i.e., your affirmation, i.e., without being judged, condemned, rejected and cast out by the citizens. As Karl Marx wrote regarding "the people," i.e., regarding his self, "I am nothing and I should be everything," i.e., "I am a sinner, judged and condemned by God and I should be God, ruling over the world, i.e., 'the people.'" (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') Rejecting the Word of God, i.e., "the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof" (1 Corinthians 10:26), those who advocate (demand) compromise, follow after the ideology of Rousseau, "the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody." Instead of recognizing your property as yours, i.e., as private property under God, they perceive all property (including yours) as being theirs, since whatever they see they own, with you taking care of it for them—supporting them in tax dollars in the process. As J. L. Moreno wrote it in his book, Who Shall Survive?: "Parents have no right upon their offspring except a psychological right. Literally the children belong to universality [to the facilitators of 'change,' i.e., to the therapist, i.e., to the Marxists]."
"The peasantry [the father's/Father's authority system] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the traditional "middle-class" family]—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions [doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth] everywhere." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920)
"The workers' council [the consensus, facilitated meeting] spells the political and economic defeat of reification [the end of limited government, i.e., the end of the father's authority over his home, property, and business, i.e., local control]. In the period following the dictatorship [the dictatorship (despotism) always remains] it will eliminate the bourgeois separation of the legislature, administration and judiciary [which has already taken place in "the workers' council," i.e., the consensus (bypartisan) meetings in government, which is under the influence of the facilitator of 'change, i.e., the despot, who by his method of seduction, deception, and manipulation (and support of those who follow him) has become legislator, administrator, and judge, with the affirmation of "the group" aka "the people"]." (Lukács)
"It is proposed that no facts or opinion be considered by the Congress [the United Nations council] unless the facts and opinions be the established consensus of a group of collaborators [thereby censoring out/negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., Nationalism in establishing policy or making law]." (Harry Stack Sullivan, The Fusion of Psychiatry and Social Science)
"I've decided to get into the World Federalists, become pro-UN, & the like." "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first―it certainly doesn't amount to much now & won't until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'" "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & cost much blood." ". . . A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.) (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)
"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students [those students who adhere to the father's/Father's authority] that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)
"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [Nationalism]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost [Globalists]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
"In a democratic society a patriarchal culture should make us depressed instead of glad; it [the father's/Father's authority] is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization." (Maslow, Management)
"Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [an environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Maslow, Journals)
"According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle ["lust," "enjoyment," dopamine emancipation]." "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the carnal nature of the child]; the foundation has to be recovered ['liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]. " "I wagered my intellectual life on the idea of finding in Freud what was missing in Marx." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
"As the Frankfurt School [Theodor Adorno, Erick Fromm, Paul Lazarsfeld, etc., including Kurt Lewin (who edited their newspaper), Marxists who came to America, fleeing Fascist Germany (Frankfurt, Germany) in the early 30's, entering our Universities as professors, influencing (changing) them] wrestled with how to 'reinvigorate Marx', they 'found the missing link in Freud.'" (Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950)
"I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7
"And through covetousness [your lust(s)] shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3
"The individual may have 'secret' thoughts ["lusts"] which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it [out of fear of being judged, rejected, and/or punished]. To gain access [through getting him or her to dialogue, i.e., to share his or her "feelings," i.e., carnal desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' (that he is internally, i.e., privately struggling with) with others] is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential [for 'change,' i.e., to become of and for his or her "self" and the world only—'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Adorno)
Through the use of dialogue, gaining access to your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "feelings," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' i.e., what you "covet" they are able to seduce you, using "feigned words," i.e., plastic words (πλαστός, i.e., plastos; Greek) giving you what you want to hear ("Trust me/us." "I am/We are here to 'help' you." "We are in this together." "We working for Us." etc.,) in order to gain your trust ("building relationship with you based upon your and their common self interests," i.e., lusts) they are able to deceive you, thereby being able to move you down their pathway they are able to turn you into "human resource," i.e., into "merchandise" they able to manipulate you, i.e., control you in order to use you for their own pleasure and gain (profit), buying and selling your soul on the open market of trade, with your approval (affirmation).
"If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood." "We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
Once you are hooked, i.e., intoxicated, addicted, and possessed by lust and fear you can not get off, i.e., you have nothing wherewith to pay them off—they own it all (you gave it, i.e., your soul to them when they hooked you on your desire, i.e., lust for their approval, i.e., affirmation). Without them you have/are nothing, your "What can I get out of this person and/or situation for my self," to satisfy your lusts, has now become "What will happen to me if I don't go along?" i.e., "What will they do to me if I get in their way?" i.e., "What will happen to me if they reject me?" i.e., fear of man. They will cast you off (as trash) when you no longer satisfy their self interests, i.e., their lusts or you get in their way, doing to you what you did to God when you chose them, i.e., lust and the world that stimulates it over and therefore against Him, i.e., doing the Father's will. The road to Utopia ("worldly peace and socialist harmony") is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way, i.e., the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous.
"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4
God is patient. He is not tolerant. All the world, including the "church" has embraced tolerance, i.e., dialogue ("tolerance of ambiguity," i.e., lust) as its means of communication, rejecting the authority of God's Word (making God's Word subject to the opinions, i.e., to the feelings and thoughts , i.e., self interest, i.e., lusts of men), making man, created in the image of God, a social(ist) animal instead—subject to stimulus-response and instinct (impulses and urges), 'justifying' his lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, including his lust for the affirmation of men—'justifying' his compromise (for the sake of relationship, i.e., for the sake of self, i.e., lust actualization). Self, self interest, and lust, which includes your lust for the approval (affirmation) of men go hand in hand.
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
"Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD." "Blessed is the man that trusteth in the LORD, and whose hope the LORD is." Jeremiah 17:5, 7
The way of the world is you doing your will, 'justifying' your doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., 'justifying' your lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, negating the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders in the process Both Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud advocated and advanced this ideology (agenda), i.e., the 'justification' of self, i.e., of lust, thus 'justifying' the negation of the father's/Father's authority, negating the guilty conscience it engenders for compromising, i.e., for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in the process (the real agenda).
"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (Lukács)
"Lawfulness without law" (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) In other words, the law of the flesh, i.e., lust without the law of God, i.e., the father's/Father's authority getting in the way. This was the world of Immanuel Kant's, et al. imagination (reasoning).
By exposing your children to a situation of compromise, i.e., that stimulates lust (including their lust for "the group's" approval), their response reveals their "mental health," i.e., their adaptability to 'change.' Education (with its use of "Blooms' Taxonomies," i.e., Marxist curriculum in the classroom, i.e., the "group grade") has made this its agenda, i.e., 'liberating' children from their parent's (the father's) authority, thereby negating the guilty conscience it engenders.
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain) With children questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority without having a guilty conscience., i.e., void of any sense of guilt.
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:'" (Brown)
"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)
"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)
If you remove the father's/Father's authority in an environment establishing right and wrong behavior the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is negated. By establishing right and wrong behavior in an environment needing compromise, in order to "get along," the guilty conscience is replaced with the "superego," i.e., the child's natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating as well as his natural hatred toward restraint, i.e., toward the father's/Father's authority (for getting in the way).
"Blooms' Taxonomies" are "a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents." (Book 1: Cognitive Domain) Their agenda is to 'liberate' the students "affective domain," i.e., the students lusts, what Bloom recognized was "Pandora's box" (a box/jar full of evils, which once opened could not be closed) from the parent's control (restraints). While the guilty conscience is a result of the father's/Father's authority, the superego is a result of the world's influence upon the child (the child's lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint—what he has in common with all the children "of the world").
"The affective domain [the student's natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and hate restraint] contains the forces that determine the nature of an individual's life and ultimately the life of an entire people." "The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box' [a "box" full of evils, which once opened, can not be closed—once the father's/Father's authority, i.e., fear of judgment, i.e., "the lid" is removed it is difficult if not impossible to put it back on again].' It is in this 'box' that the most influential controls are to be found." "In fact, a large part of what we call "good teaching" is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives ['liberating' the child's carnal nature from the father's/Father's authority] through challenging the student's fixed beliefs [challenging the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth] and getting them to discuss issues [evaluating the world through their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "self interests" of the 'moment']." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
"... the superego 'unites in itself the influences of the present and of the past.'" (Brown)
"Superego development is conceived as the incorporation of the moral standards of society. Therefore the levels of the Taxonomy should describe successive levels of goal setting appropriate to superego development." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
Every student is in therapy in the "group grade," dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, facilitated, "Bloom's Taxonomy" classroom, with his or her lust for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating being 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders.
"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Rogers)
This was Karl Marx's agenda.
"It is not individualism that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx) While the father/Father rejects compromise, i.e., chastens his children for disobeying his commands the world demands compromise in order to "get along."
"The individual is emancipated in the social group." "Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt [the guilty conscience for disobeying the father/Father] be assuaged." (Brown)
"Once the earthly family [with the earthly father in authority] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Heavenly Father in authority], the former [the earthly father with his authority over the family] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's/people's thoughts and in their actions (their behavior) with one another]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)
While Karl Marx advanced killing the father(s) outright, Sigmund Freud (who, as Karl Marx hated the father's/Father's authority) believed the father could stay around as along as he accepted his, his wife's, his children's, his neighbors lusting after the carnal pleasures of 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating as the "norm"—thus abdicating his authority.
"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises authority over his family]." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)
"... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." ibid. Freud's history of the prodigal son was not that of the son coming to his senses, humbling his self, returning home to submit to his father's authority, discovering his inheritance was not his father's money but his father's love for him but of the son along with his "friends," coming to a consensus, returning home, killing and devouring the father, taking all that the father had, using it to satisfy their carnal desires, i.e., their lusts.
When you begin with the father's/Father's authority, making him the focus of attention, compromise ('change') is inhibited or blocked, i.e., prevented. When you begin with the children, making them the focus of attention, compromise, i.e., lust is 'justified,' negating the father's/Father's authority. Focusing on the family accomplishes the same deed, likewise, through the use of dialogue (in order to "build relationship in the family") negates the father's/Father's authority.
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." (Brown)
In other words, according to Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, et al. it is lust, i.e., the child's carnal nature that "reconciles" you to the world. Without 'liberating' you, i.e., your self, i.e., your lusts from the father's/Father's authority, you are subject to him/Him.
"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), "of and for self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)
Georg Hegel, sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself (who was not yet born) could then write:
"On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [there being no "top-down" authority structure in the home (with the husband/father as the head), with all being subject only to "human nature," i.e., to "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life"], where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object, the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one [private convictions, private family, private property, private business, etc., i.e., "Mine. Not yours," i.e., "My wife," "My children," "My property," "My business," etc., "Not yours" is negated, i.e., your unalienable rights, i.e., your rights given to you by God are negated]." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life)
Money, i.e., "capital," according to Karl Marx, et al. comes in here since it represents stored up pleasure which the children of disobedience, i.e., the facilitator of 'change' and those who think like him (being cast out of the family for their canal behavior, i.e., for their disrespect for and rejection of the father's/Father's authority) can not have or will not inherit—the private business/property owner determining who will and who will not work for him based upon their behavior, i.e., their abiding by his established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Only by negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., 'liberating' the children of disobedience, i.e., the facilitator of 'change' from the father's/Father's authority can they not only have access to capital (stored up pleasure), but determine themselves who will have access to it.
"'Capital' … is, according to Marx, 'not a thing but a social relation between persons mediated through things.' 'These relations,' Marx states, 'are not those between one individual and another [which makes all equal, according to "human nature"], but between worker and capitalist, tenant and landlord [children and their parents, the worker and his boss, man and God, with the parent, boss, God determining which child, worker, man will receive payment (reward) and/or inheritance and which will not (based upon their behavior toward authority)], etc.,. Eliminate these relations and you abolish the whole of society ['civil society'—which to the socialist is the problem]; …… a scientifically acceptable solution does exist ["behavior science"—through the use of dialogue (affirming and thereby establishing the children's carnal nature of loving pleasure and hating restraint over and therefore against their parent's authority) 'liberating' the children from their parents authority so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after (and have cash or financial support to enjoy) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience—without fear of losing financial support of their carnal desires, i.e., "lusts"]… For to accept that solution, even in theory [for parents to go into or think about going into dialogue with their children regarding right and wrong behavior they must abdicate their authority to their children's carnal nature], would be tantamount to observing society from a class standpoint [from the children's perspective, making commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., money subject to their children "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., subjective] other than that of the bourgeoisie [from the parent's perspective, making money subject to doing right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth]. And no class can do that-unless it is willing to abdicate its power freely [if parents are to observe the world, including their authority from their children's perspective, they must first abdicate their authority to their children's "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts"—this is all accomplished through dialogue, i.e., there is no parental authority in dialogue, or in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only the "feelings" ("lusts" for pleasure and hatred toward restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority) of the people/children participating, making policy on what is right and what is wrong behavior determined by them (right behavior being lust, wrong behavior being the father's/Father's authority)]." (Lukács)
'Liberation' of self from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., 'reconciling' you to the world that stimulates lust in you is the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the therapist's agenda (duty), putting into praxis (social action) Karl Marx's dictum: "The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways [retaining the father's/Father's authority, insisting that everyone do it their way], the objective however, is change [continuous 'change,' i.e., being stimulated by and responding to that which is only "of the world"]"—which is inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb. (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Rejecting the Son, who, by His shed blood on the cross (in obedience to the Father in all things commanded, even unto death) 'redeeming' you from the lake of fire that is never quenched, the Father, through raising Him from the grave 'reconciling' you to Himself, in order for you to spend eternity in His glory, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, et al. instead 'redeem' you from the Father and the Son, 'reconciling' you to the world so you can spend eternity with them and the master facilitator of 'change' in the lake of fire that is never quenched, where there is no pleasure, only pain, i.e., the gnashing of teeth throughout eternity. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." John 3:16-18
"Without exception, [children] enter group therapy [the "group grade" classroom] with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group—their primary family [the traditional home with parents telling them what they can and can not do]." "What better way to help [the child] recapture the past than to allow him to re-experience and reenact ancient feelings [resentment, hostility] toward parents in his current relationship to the therapist [the facilitator of 'change]? The [facilitator of 'change'] is the living personification of all parental images [takes the place of the parent]. Group [facilitators] refuse to fill the traditional authority role: they do not lead in the ordinary manner, they do not provide answers and solutions [teach right from wrong from established commands, rules, facts, and truth], they urge the group [the children] to explore and to employ its own resources [to dialogue their "feelings," i.e., their desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., their desire for "the group" approval (affirmation)]. The group [children] must feel free to confront the [the facilitator of 'change'], who must not only permit, but encourage, such confrontation [rebellion and anarchy]. He [the child] reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy [brainwashing—washing respect for and fear of the father's/Father's authority from the child's brain (thoughts) ] is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role [submitting to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will] he once occupied. … the patient [the child] changes the past by reconstituting it ['creating' a "new" world order from his "ought," i.e., a world "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., a world void of the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the current situation and/or people are stimulating]." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)
When it comes to right and wrong behavior a little compromise, like yeast, goes a long way. The next time someone works on your car or on your house, or teaches your children, tell them if they want to tell your children to compromise your standards (when your standards get in the way of their lusts, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their self interest of the 'moment') that it is just fine, "As long as they are enjoying themselves, it is OK."
"Individuals move not from a fixity through change to a new fixity, though such a process is indeed possible [where the child accepts and obeys established commands, rules, facts, and truth, with doing right and not wrong according to established standards controlling his thoughts and actions, where the child tries to persuade others, through discussion to accept his standards as right, i.e., as true]. But [through a] continuum from fixity to changingness, from rigid structure to flow, from stasis to process [from doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., discussion to dialogue, i.e., doing what "seems" 'right,' i.e., satisfies his carnal desires (lusts)of the 'moment']." "At one end of the continuum the individual avoids close relationships, which are perceived as being dangerous [doing or being right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth being his concern]. At the other end he lives openly and freely in relation to the therapist and to others [the "educator" and "the group"], guiding his behavior on the basis of his immediate experiencing [being able to do what he wants, when he wants, in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., what he can get out of it for his "self," with group approval (affirmation), what "the group" thinks (not what the father/Father thinks) from then on controls his thoughts and actions] – he has become an integrated process of changingness." (Rogers)
By making the child's "self interest," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' the core of his classroom experience the "educator," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' is able to 'change' the child's way of thinking and acting without his full knowledge of where the "educator" is taking him, he will naturally follow the "educator" and "the group" wherever he is leading "the group," i.e., him.
"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." (Lewin in Benne) You are more apt to compromise in a group setting than one-on-one with an individual.
"There is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance." "Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity." (Yalom)
The "educator" (facilitator of 'change') does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature, i.e., "lust" over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate. The same outcome applies to all adults, in any profession who participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., of 'justifying' compromise for the sake of lust. Once you are 'labeled,' you are 'labeled' for life. In the soviet union (as in Communist China), once you were (are) 'labeled' "psychological" (a resister to 'change'—refusing to compromise to the lusts of the 'moment' for the sake of relationship with others) no matter how important you were in the past (are in the present), your life was over, your career was (is) done. The same is true for America today.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2021