Bullies. by Dean Gotcher

Bullies.

by
Dean Gotcher

'Liberal's,' i.e., those of the consensus process always demand their way (despite what they might say), bullying those who refuse to give them what they want, when they want it, bullying those who refuse to be like them—always 'justifying' themselves, i.e., their "self"-ish ways—bullying those who they perceive as being a threat to their selfish, sulking, hateful ways, calling them "bullies" when they get in their way.

Bullies hate those who preach and teach the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, who preach and teach rule of law—which holds everyone accountable for their actions—who refuse to 'change,' who demand discussion of facts and truth instead of dialoguing "feelings," i.e., opinions and theories in order to solve problems (crisis), who refuse to affirm them, i.e., who refuse to make them "feel good," i.e., who correct, reprove, rebuke them for their deceitful and wicked ways, who refuse to be a "team player" (common-ist) with them, who expose them for their childish ways. 'Liberals' calling anyone who prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks them from having what they want "bullies," making themselves the victim instead so others will sympathize with them (feel bad for them) and support them, i.e., side with them against the "bullies," so they can have their way.

'Liberals,' instead of "pursuing" pleasure, i.e., working to get it through hard work, i.e., by the sweat of their brow, think the world owes it to them, that they deserve it for just being here, that it is their just dues—intimidating, threatening, bulling anyone who does not see it their way, who does not support them emotionally, financially, and collectively, who does not giving them what they want now—treating anyone who does not side with them and support them as being a "bully."

If you want to see what a bully looks like, look at the 'liberal' today. They are the perfect example. But don't tell them that. They will turn and bully ("rend") you for exposing them, i.e., for hurting their "feelings," i.e., for disturbing the image they have of themselves (caring for those being "bullied" by the father/Father, "helping" them to 'liberate' themselves from his/His authority). Like selfish, disobedient, rebellious children—hating restraint and therefore the restrainer—it is in their nature to think and act that way.

Putting your child in the "group grade," dialoguing opinions to a consensus classroom means you do not mind bullies picking on your child until your child sees it their way, coming home to accuse you of bulling them when you tell them to stop what they are doing, i.e., having pleasure and do their chores instead. Are we really this stupid?—putting our children in a "safe zone" or "safe space" where they are bullied into joining "the group" in questioning, challenging, disregarding, defying, attacking authority, bulling anyone who questions, challenges, etc., them and the consensus process from then on, resulting in them no longer having a fear of repercussions, i.e., consequences, i.e., accountability for their thoughts and actions—for their hate of restraint and the restrainer. It appears we are.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

"And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:4-5, 12

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." Jeremiah 6:16

To "ask for the old paths... and walk therein" would make you a bully in the eyes of the 'liberal.' That is why they will not listen to what you have to say, bullying you, i.e., shouting you down instead, until you see it their way—for your and their own "good." "Good" meaning, to them, having it their way—with no restraint. "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' themselves, i.e., their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the pleasures of the 'moment' over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12