I though I was studying Hegel, Marx, Freud ... and then I came to realize I was studying righteousness. That is, the negation of it. That is what the dialectical process is all about. Read the introduction to the articles to understand.
Diaprax is
man's nature,
i.e. sensuousness, i.e. his carnal feelings, his carnal
thoughts, and his carnal actions (the lust of the flesh, the lust of
the eyes, and the pride of life) being put into social action (praxis). Since
Diaprax is that which is common to all mankind, i.e. sensuousness, it
is man's common feelings, common thought, and common actions ("theory and practice")
being 'rationally' justified and put into common social action (praxis).
Thus,
Diaprax is common-ism. Common-ism is man's common-collective
sensuousness, i.e. his common-collective
feelings, common-collective thoughts being 'collectively' justified
in consensus and put into common-collective-sensuous-action―social praxis.
Diaprax (the same as sensitivity training) is being used in government, in
the workplace, in the education
system, by neighbors, and even by the church, 'encouraging' you
to put Genesis 3:1-6
into praxis (where man first used Diaprax, 'discovering' his
common-ism with the creation via. the 'justification' of
sensuousness over and against righteousness).
In dialectic 'reasoning,' between the time that God created man
(putting his essence, i.e. oneness, in that which he formed
from the dust of the ground) and His giving of man the command not
to eat of the "forbidden" tree (not to treat God's tree as his tree,
"lest ye die," causing "two-ness," i.e. antithesis, i.e. "I'm
from above and you are from below") man was only man, only of
himself, human ('righteous' in his own eyes alone). With the
addition of "Mine not yours" and the threat of punishment
(chastisement or even death for disobedience) man became alienated
from himself, and therefore estranged from the world, his own nature
repressed by God, making righteousness (God himself) the
reason for life (a substitute gratification or 'purpose' for life).
Reasoning therefore became subject to righteousness, subject
to the creator (spiritual, i.e. man having to evaluate his thoughts
and his actions according to God's will from above),
preventing 'reasoning' from realizing itself through sensuousness,
engendered through the creation itself (temporal, i.e. man
evaluating his thoughts and his actions according the will of his
own nature from below). Through dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e.
the praxis of Genesis 3:1-6 (where man first negated
righteousness through the act of 'reasoning' justifying
sensuousness) man can come to know himself as he 'really' "is,"
i.e. carnal, and become "at-one-with" nature (the world) again.
Diaprax is Gnosticism being put into social praxis in the
twenty-first century, man becoming himself, sensuous, united
as one in himself as he purges' himself of righteousness,
i.e. negating, in his thoughts and in his actions, that which
is not of himself, not only individually but also socially, i.e. the
two, his carnal thoughts and his carnal behavior, becoming one in
social action (praxis).
Until you understand the method of Diaprax, the dialectical
process and how it is put into practice (praxis), you will not be
able to understand what has happened to America over the past 60
years. You will not understand what is happening to change the
world around you into a "New" world order. You will not
understand how the church has been seduced, deceived, and
manipulated into participation with the "New" world order. Be
sure to read the article
"Diaprax: a spiraling process of 'changingness'" in the
Articles on Diaprax link for a better understanding of how the
process affects a persons faith in God.
Diaprax is an antichrist, anti-scriptural way of thinking.
Putting feelings, i.e. sensuousness, between you and God, making God a
"feeling,"
making God's Word subject to human sensuousness―making
knowing (where truth is established, spiritual, proceeding from
God above, speaking to the soul of man below and therefore must be
preached and taught) an opinion,
(where all relevant 'truth' is temporal, sensual, subject to the flesh of man
and therefore must be dialogued).
Diaprax is a heresiarchal paradigm of 'change.' Diaprax
is being actively used to 'change' you and the world you live in for
the "the common-collective-sensuous 'good'"("good sense")
of all (of the 'All').
Humanism and globalism is Diaprax (man's carnal nature) being made
into the law of the land. In a world run by Diaprax everyone is guilty
until they praxis Diaprax, i.e. until they apply it to their thoughts,
embrace it in their hearts, and support it with their actions, they
are suspect (as potential 'fascists' or 'terrorists').
All children (and adults) are "at
risk" of not experiencing (not participating in and therefore
not "becoming" justified in) Diaprax.
Diaprax is "equality of opportunity," where everybody
can participate in that which he has in common with all of mankind,
i.e. his earthy nature. Diaprax is sensuousness and
spontaneity no longer restrained by un-natural, anti-carnal
(spiritual)
laws. Diaprax is sensuousness and spontaneity
emancipated within an "open-ended," "non-directed" environment which is "tolerant of ambiguity."
Diaprax is patricide, i.e. the annihilation
of the patriarchal paradigm of 'fixity' by the emancipation of the
heresiarchal paradigm of a process of 'change.' Diaprax is incest,
i.e. the praxis of consensus, i.e. man worshiping the
common-collective sensuous 'moment' of oneness, man united
upon an orgiastic, "Dionysian ego which does not negate
any more." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death.)
Some saw the danger in the use of Diaprax, but never
repented:
“I’ve been in continuous
conflict over this Esalen-type, orgiastic, Dionysian-type education.”
(Abraham Maslow The Journals of Abraham Maslow) While
others placed all their hopes upon its use: “Consciousness, instead of
being the watchman over a dangerous and unpredictable lot of
impulses, becomes the comfortable inhabitant of a society of
impulses and feelings and thoughts.” “Individuals move not from a
fixity through change to a new fixity, though such a process is
indeed possible. But [through a]
continuum from fixity to changingness, from rigid structure to flow, from
stasis to process.” (Carl Rogers On Becoming a Person)
With its penetrating focus upon the destruction of the traditional
family (the restrainer of sensuousness), Diaprax uses "social, environmental forces
to change the
parent's behavior toward their children" (Theodor Adorno,
The Authoritarian Personality) to where
the child's sensuous nature is liberated from the
"autocratic control" of the parent―by
the parent's 'willful' abdication of their God given authority to
rule over their home so
as to be in 'good' standing with the "village"―fearful
of government agencies taking their children away, as well as
fearful of being fined and even imprisoned.
Diaprax is man trying to find "peace" with himself and the world
(experiencing
"positive social change"). "When a man has finally reached the
point where he does not think he knows it better than others, that
is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly and
he is interested only in what they have done right
[permissiveness], then peace and
affirmation have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel, in one of the casual notes preserved at Widener) Diaprax is man liberated from
non-human―not of nature―conditions,
patriarchal
conditions which produce "negative social change,"
conditions demanding
behavior (righteousness) which must be carried out repressing one's own
personal feelings (sensuousness) and actions (spontaneity, impulses)
and thoughts (carnal). Those who propagate Diaprax first recognize that
restraints against sensuousness engenders opposition (antithesis)
against the restrainer. They then create conditions to
liberate sensuousness, i.e.
purifying it and uniting it (synthesis), and then put it into
social action (praxis) against non-human (authoritarian) conditions which
demand righteousness.
Diaprax is man emancipated from "authoritarian personalities"
(parents and God), and their "negative force field"
(chastening) i.e. which engenders
"neurosis" (feeling
guilty for thinking and acting worldly, thereby thinking and acting
counter to ones worldly nature). Diaprax is
Genesis
3:1-6 emancipating man from
Hebrews 12: 5-11, i.e. which engenders
Romans
7:14-25. Diaprax is the system of human reasoning,
self-justification (the dialectical process of
thesis-antithesis-synthesis, i.e. of 'change,' of Hegel
and Marx fame, which was first put into praxis in Genesis 3:1-6) which
emancipates man from the system of chastening, i.e. a system which
produces a peaceful fruit of righteousness and obedience to
higher authority (as explained in Hebrews 12:5-11), i.e. which is
dialectically correlated as capitalism, i.e. capitulation, i.e. which
engenders and justifies the system of judgment, of right and wrong, heaven and
hell, upon human nature (as explained in Romans 7:14-25) and thus
necessitates mans
need for imputed righteousness, i.e. redemption (salvation
from human nature and God's judgment upon it), not knowable or
accessible through human sensuousness nor human 'reasoning'. According
to Diaprax, since the
use of chastening (Hebrew 12:5-11, where chastening is used to inculcate obedience toward
higher authority, producing a top-down way of thinking―a
patriarchal paradigm)
produces neurosis (Romans 7:14-25, an order where human
nature is made subject to a higher authority than a persons own
nature thus making him feel guilty because of his carnal human
nature and thus 'forces' him to fight against it), by
dialectically ('rationally' ) negating the justification for chastening
(by making the act of chastening, i.e. restraining carnal human
nature by chastening, making it appear 'irrational' in a 'rapidly
changing,' 'post-modern' world) higher authority
is negated (is made 'irrelevant') and neurosis
(the guilty conscience and "repression") is overcome, i.e. higher
authority and the system of rules which inhibit or block human
nature (restraining carnal human
nature) can be annihilated without a sense of guilt on the
part of those 'negating' those who believe in them, i.e. with everyone now 'driven'
with the 'purpose' of producing a physically, mentally, and socially
healthy world, freed from the system of neurosis, i.e. liberated
from the fear of
judgment from a Holy and Pure God and the need for repentance
before Him, because of man's carnal human behavior. "'Neurosis is a social product, in which the family [is] seen
as a primary agent of repressive socialization.'" (Max
Horkheimer in Erich Fromm, Marx’s Concept of Man)
Diaprax is the negation of the traditional home.
"Thus, for instance, once the earthly family is
discovered to be the secret of the holy family, the
former must itself be annihilated
[vernichtet]
theoretically and practically." (Karl Marx Theses
On Feuerbach #4) “God is
conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source
of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority.”
(Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
Diaprax is the negation of the authority of the parent so
as to negate the authority of God. If you can not
negate belief in God by coming through the front door―outright
attack belief, come through the back door―destroy
the traditional home which initiates and sustains the system of
belief. "Christians" are not persecuted in the soviet
system (in the Diaprax system), the system of belief is, i.e. along
with the believers
who initiate and sustain it.
For Diaprax to be successful no one can
escape. Everyone must participate. Everyone must "shift" their paradigm
(their way of thinking and acting) from God above (a
patriarchal paradigm, where man is to have faith in and obey higher
authority, God being the highest authority above man's nature and
nature itself) to 'god' below (a heresiarchal paradigm of 'change,' where
mankind―man uniting and in
harmony with his own sensual nature and with nature itself―is
'god,' i.e. "a society of
impulses and feelings and thoughts"). Therefore, no one,
neither child nor adult, will be "left behind" until
all have participated in Diaprax (all must participate in Diaprax for the health, welfare, and the
'goodness' of all mankind―where
'goodness' is measured by human pleasure liberated and sustained in social action).
Diaprax is the dialectical process
(the 'scientific' justification of man's common carnal nature) being
put into social practice (social-ism, common-ism). Diaprax is a "rational" process
whereby man can recognize and then actualize himself only within
that which is of nature (his own and others), 'driven' in the
'purpose' of negating righteousness through the
liberation of sensuousness. Through the use of "the
scientific method" (the dialectic process) sensuousness (that
which science can only recognize) is purged of righteousness
(that which science can not recognize), i.e. man is purified, i.e.
cleansed of God (not cleansed by God).
Diaprax is the road to Armageddon traveled by all who love
this world. Diaprax is a man leaning
upon his own understanding, no longer trusting in the Lord with all
his heart. (Proverbs 3:5, 6). Diaprax is a 'rational' process whereby a man can
'shift' his paradigm (his way of thinking and acting) from
faith to sight; from faith in God to 'faith' in mankind (making
sensuousness and experience―"sense
experience"―the basis for 'discovering' truth).
Diaprax is a 'science' of human behavior ("behavior science")
being put into social action (praxis). Diaprax is the
ideology of Marx and Freud united, i.e. the negation of faith in God
by the 'resurrection' of human nature. By replacing faith with
sight, belief with theory, truth with opinions, righteousness
with sensuousness. To have 'faith'
in using a scientific method to 'discover' man's nature can only
result in having 'faith' in man's carnal nature (science built upon
human opinions or theories, treating them as thought they are facts, is not true science―1
Timothy 6:20). Science, when used to 'discover' man's nature, can only
'discover' man's carnal nature (only 'discovering' 'truth,' through dialogue and opinions,
i.e. because of the 'remnant' factor, not all fit the mold refusing
to bend their knee to the beast system, the repeatable part of true
science can never happen in 'behavior science,' therefore making it
a counterfeit, deceitful 'science').
Those who praxis Diaprax, 'purpose' to build their
"New World Order" ('new' order of the world, as 'new' as
Genesis 3:1-6) upon man's carnal nature, 'shifting' all the laws
of the land so that they can initiate and sustain ('drive') humanism
('drive' everyone into social-sensual one-ness), thereby creating a world of common-ism,
social-ism (where life has no value or worth outside of the
collective-sensuous-nature of carnal man).
This is the spirit of antichrist, from which the contemporary 'church'
emerges (see
Articles on Diaprax),
an apostate, harlot church 'driven' by the sensuousness of
man 'purposed' in the negation of the that which can
only come from the Lord, i.e. His righteousness imputed
to those who believe in Him, i.e. those who live by faith and not by
sight. "And he said, I will
hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they
are a very froward [perverse] generation, children in whom is
no faith." Deuteronomy 32:20
© Institution for Authority Research Dean Gotcher 2010-11