The Great Commission is didactic not dialectic.
Church Growth and Emerging Church ministers are getting it wrong.
They are by their own nature Apostate (using the diaprax method: substituting teaching truth with dialoguing opinions).

They error, not knowing the scriptures.
Matthew 28:19, 20

"Go ye therefore, and teach (μάθητεϋώ: to instruct, make disciples, make pupils of) all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching (διδάσκώ: didasko, i.e. didactic;  to impart instruction, instill doctrine, to explain or expound, to teach)  them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen" Matthew 28:19, 20

    There is no middle ground (room for discourse) in a didactic, deductive, patriarchal paradigm (commands based). Break one part of the law and you break it all. Discourse will not change the outcome, only repentance will.  The situation is antithesis, dualism; obey me and you will be blessed or disobey me and you will be cursed, black or white, right or wrong, heaven or hell, sheep or goats, saved or lost, Christ or Belial, something is one way and can not be any other way, etc. Except or repentance, we have nothing we can bring before God for our disobedience.  We most recognize and praxis our total dependence upon him for our obedience.

"Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse; A blessing, if ye obey the commandments of the LORD your God, which I command you this day: And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the LORD your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known." Deuteronomy 11:26-28  Deuteronomy 27:15-26

The Great Deception is dialectic.

While truth liberates (frees the soul from man's temporal, enslaving carnal nature), truth also alienates (frees the soul from the acceptance of those who seek harmony/peace with the world, i.e. man's temporal, carnal nature).

Didactic Paradigm: God (our creator) is the measure of all things.

    "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting." Galatians 6:4

    "Let no man deceive himself.  If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.  For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.  For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness."  1 Corinthians 3:18-19

"For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself." Galatians 6:3

Dialectic Paradigm: Man (the creation) is the measure of all things.

“Every class lacks the breadth of soul which identifies it with the soul of the people, that revolutionary boldness which flings at its adversary the defiant phrase; I am nothing and I should be everything.” “The only practically possible emancipation is the unique theory which holds that man is the supreme being for man.”  Karl Marx  Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right'

"Man has only to understand himself, to take himself as the measure of all aspects of life, to judge according to his being, to organise the world in a truly human manner according to the demands of his own nature, and he will have solved the riddle of our time. But there is no other salvation for him, he cannot regain his humanity, his substance, other than by thoroughly overcoming all religious ideas and returning firmly and honestly, not to 'God', but to himself." Frederick Engels The Condition of England A review of Past and Present, by Thomas Carlyle, London, 1843 Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, 1844

“The justice of state constitutions is to be decided not on the basis of Christianity, not from the nature of Christian society but from the nature of human society.” Joseph O’Malley, Ibid.

“... the Freudian hypothesis ... does not lead back to the image of a paradise which man has forfeited by his sin against God ...”
“[... the Freudian hypothesis leads] to the domination of man by man.” “Frauds individual psychology is in its very essence social psychology.” Eros and Civilization: A psychological inquiry into Freud Herbart Marcuse

"My first scientific dream was that if I were God I would be able to start an adequate science of the universe.... all measure and tests of humanity should be constructed after the model of God involved in the creation of the universe.... a science of the Godhead also a science of culture cannot be produced at a distance and post mortem by philosophers and historians; it must be initiated and inspired by the creators of the cultures themselves." "... the origins of my work go back to a primitive religion and my objectives were the setting up and promoting of a new cultural order."  "As I tried the sociometric system first on the universe and on the concept of God, its first manifesto was a revolutionary religion, a change of the idea of the universe and the idea of God.  The god of Jesus was further extended, the son 'withered away' until nothing was left except the universal creativity of the Godhead and only one commandment: To each according to what he is (an all-inclusive acceptance of the individual 'as he is).'"  "A creator, as soon as his work has emanated from him, has no right to it any longer except a psychological right.  He had all rights upon it as long as it was growing in him but he has forfeited these as soon as it is gone out of him and becomes a part of the world.  It belongs to universality."  "Parents have no right upon their offspring except a psychological right. Literally the children belong to universality."  "We propose, therefore, the specialization of the notion of parenthood into two distinct and different functions-the biological parent and the social parent.  They may come together in one individual or they may not.  But the problem is how to produce a procedure which is able to substitute and improve this ancient order." "...we have described roleplaying as diagnostic method but it can also  be used as 'role therapy' to improve the relations between the members of a group."   [If you have ever participated in role-playing, Moreno is the noted Marxist who developed it for Americans, with the hope that it would be utilized towards achieving a global community.] "The community needs, therefore, to be explored and, if necessary, purged from undesirable cultural conserves .... The community must be 'deconserved' from the pathological excesses of its own culture, or at least, they must be put under control." "Sociometry can assist the United States, with its population consisting of practically all the races on the globe, in becoming an outstanding example of a society which has no need of extraneous ideas or of forces which are not inherent in its own structure."  J. L. Moreno Who Shall Survive

"Through the repression of needs and wishes, it translates this constraint into a compulsion of internal nature, in other words into the constraint of social norms. That is why the relative destruction of the moral relation can be measured only by the difference between the actual degree of institutionally demanded repression and the degree of repression that is necessary at a given level of the forces of production. This difference is a measure of objectively superfluous domination. It is those who establish such domination and defend positions of power of this sort who set in motion the causality of fate, divide society into social classes, suppress justified interests, call forth the reactions of suppressed life, and finally experience their just fate in revolution." Jürgen Habermas Knowledge & Human Interest, 1968, publ. Polity Press, 1987. Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social

“… the man who has achieved a philosophy of life – who knows who he is – has arrived at this truth through painful intellectual effort in which the more complex mental processes of the Cognitive Taxonomy are clearly functioning.” “Judges problems in terms of situation, issues, purposes, and consequences involved rather than in terms of fixed, dogmatic precepts ….” “Obedience and compliance are hardly ideal goals.” “A basic tenet of liberal education is that it is by means of intellectual effort that a philosophy of life in large measure is formed.” “The major ingredient required in such instruments is that the problem be sufficiently subtle and complex … that the generalized set which we wish to observe can be brought into play.” “We are not interested in whether the problem is solved accurately or with elegance.” “We want the student to lead the good life and become a good man in all his parts.” “… the greatest good for the greatest number.” Benjamin S. Bloom  Taxonomy of Education Objectives Book I Cognitive Domain 1956  This book is used in all education institutions, "Christian" included, to train teachers in how to develop and present their curriculum.  The curriculum used determines the next generations paradigm, how they will think. This is no trivial matter.

God's thoughts and ways vs. man's thoughts and ways

    From the fall of Lucifer (Isaiah 14:12-15) and then the fall of mankind  (Genesis 3:1-6) the didactic, patriarchal, biblical paradigm―"my thoughts ... my ways" (thoughts and actions directed toward God, the creator, filtered through God's word)―has been despised by the dialectical, heresiarchal, worldly paradigm―"your thoughts ... your ways" (thoughts and actions directed toward the world, the created, filtered through mans thoughts and experiences).  Mans paradigm is a system of thoughts (theory—meditating upon man's experience) and action (dialectic praxis) based upon opinion (perception; "and Eve saw ...")―private interpretation/enlightenment (requiring questioning).  His paradigm always ridicules thought (meditating upon God's established word) and action (didactic praxis) based upon belief in and obedience to God's established Word, not discovered by private interpretation or through human experience―revelation (requiring faith).

“The ideas of the Enlightenment taught man that he could trust his own reason as a guide to establishing valid ethical norms and that he could rely on himself, needing neither revelation nor that authority of the church in order to know good and evil.” "Everything that is not reducible to number becomes illusion for the Enlightenment.” Stephen Eric Bronner  Of Critical Theory and It Theorists

    The dialectical paradigm focuses upon those things which are common (similar) to its environmental nature―material (touch, taste, sight, smell, sound).  It will take that which is spiritual and either filter out or redefine anything which is not in harmony with or which interferes with this material cosmic consciousness―holism i.e. cosmomorphism, the system as a whole determines how the parts function, "The whole is more than the sum of its parts." Whatever appears to be the best way to satisfy a person's or a group's desired goal, in light of the evidence supported by the environment, whatever is rational, reasonable, practical in the current setting, to solve the problem of personal and social dissatisfaction (caused by the didactic patriarchal paradigm), whatever "seems to be right" to mankind, is right to mankind. The  bible warns us of the consequence of our natural self-environmental dialectical rationalization:  "There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 14:12 The bible also warns us not to unite (make a contract) with anyone with a self-environmental dialectical purpose (2 Corinthians 2:14-18).

"As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ." Galatians 1:9-12

"angst"

    According to dialectical thinking―"man's thoughts ... man's ways"―"good and evil," can not to be comprehended outside of human experience. Thus "God's thoughts" and "God's ways" must be realized and actualized (illuminated) from within a common human praxis (community human experience—practice) or be negated (considered as worthless). Situation ethics, values clarification, Socratic critical thinking, are just some of the labels given to this dialectical system of thought and action.  Therefore, according to dialectical thinking (man's "thoughts and ways"), God's "thoughts and ways" cause a dialectical split between man's nature (his "thoughts and ways") and the natural environment (the cosmos) which he finds himself in. Thus, according to man's "thoughts and ways," the belief in, and the praxis of God's "thoughts and ways" is the root cause of the self-environmental dialectical rift, the reason for angst.

“Alienation is the experience of ‘estrangement’ (Verfremdung) from others, . . .” “Alienation has a long history. Its most radical sense already appears in the biblical expulsion from Eden.” “Alienation, according to Feuerbach, derives from the externalization (Entausserung) of human powers and possibilities upon a non-existent entity: God. . .” “God is thus the anthropological source of alienation . . .” “Alienation will continue so long as the subject engages in an externalization (Entausserung) of his or her subjectivity.”  Bronner Of Critical Theory and its Theorists

   Actually, alienation results from mans attempt to "internalize" God's "powers and possibilities," to becoming god like―self-actualization―where the paradigm of obedience to God (where justification is found in God―in the creator) is negated by the paradigm of self-environment  union (where justification is found in mans ability to evaluate and synthesis himself within his environment and his environment within himself―seeking harmony with himself and the creation).  Otherwise when man evaluates nature from God's revelation, it results in his awareness of God's domination over nature, domination over his own nature included. In the light of God's word, he comes to realize the corruptness of not only his neighbors nature but his own nature as well, and is willing to forsake all for the creator.

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24

"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26

"Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man’s sake." Luke 6:22

    When man evaluates the environment from his own sensitivity, his own nature (touch, taste, sight, sound, smell, and perceptional, reasoning abilities), it results in his union with the environment―he becomes a cosmic god (definer of what is good and what is evil—evil defined as commands which are based upon revelation or experiences which are anti- or non-natural, i.e. irrational). Based upon his relationship in the environment, he determines what is of worth to relate with and what is not of worth to relate with i.e. what is expendable or must be removed for the betterment of self and the environment). This is the essence of philosophy and the seeking to the question "Who am I?" "Why am I here?" and "Where am I going?" (which philosophy can never answer with certainty).  His carnal nature, which draws man into oneness with the creation, once justified (rationalized), enslaves him.  He no longer controls his carnal nature, it controls him. Actually those who know how to control the environment, which controls his nature, now control him. A self-environmental dialectical praxis is now in place.

“We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion.” “We can predict, from the way individuals perceive the movement of a spot of light in a dark room, whether they tend to be prejudiced or unprejudiced.” “We know how to influence the buying behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine.”  “…our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups. If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors will follow.”  Carl Rogers On becoming a person

    Those who understand man's carnal nature and who control the environment now have dominion over mankind. This is why facilitators of men (acting as agents of Satan, some knowingly, most unknowingly) work so hard to control the environment where decisions are made―environment control, climate control―environmentalism; conscietization, democratization, etc. Thus, according to the dialectical paradigm, the self-environment dialectical quest becomes mankind's only hope in "discovering" and "actualizing" his "purpose" within the creation. In actuality it makes him a slave, under the control of those who control the environment with his own carnal natures attachment to it. He may be a happy slave (of carnal flesh), but he will be a slave nevertheless, expendable at his owners wish.

"If an individual wishes to maintain a position of arbitrary authority, then it behooves him to inhibit the development of any rules permitting reciprocal process observation and commentary."  "the therapist … is the group historian, only he is permitted to maintain a temporal perspective, and he remains immune from the charge that he … elevates himself above the others." Irvin Yalom Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy

    Eradicating the patriarchal paradigm, according to dialectical reasoning, removes the source of alienation from the creation. This is illusionary, the blinding of mankind from God, from the creator.  This paradigm lures and then leaves mankind in sin. "This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind, Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart: Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness."  Ephesians 4:17-19  The self-environment dialectical quest, which can never satisfy the soul of man is the source of angst (anguish). (Listen to James Borchert teaching on Martin Luther, the Catholic Church and angst 10-29-06; 1 hr. 39 min.)

Overcoming the dialectical split―circumventing the traditional family role in society 

“By ‘dialectical’ I mean an activity of consciousness struggling to circumvent the limitations imposed by the formal-logical law of contradiction.” Norman O. Brown Life Against Death

“Black is black and white is white. Neither torture, maltreatment nor intimidation can change a fact. To argue the point… serves no useful purpose.”  P.O.W. Major David F. MacGhee responding to brainwashing attempts (replacing a didactic paradigm with a dialectical paradigm in praxis) by the North Korean , January 19th, 1953

    "Formal-logical law of contradiction" defines the traditional family environment―a didactic, patriarchal paradigm―where children are taught "right is right and wrong is wrong"―obedience. "Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right." Ephesians 6:1  Those who praxis the dialectical paradigm, purpose not to disobey (which would keep the didactic paradigm in consciousness and therefore power) but rather to "circumvent" (get around by getting in power and then cancel out) the didactic paradigm. 

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon .... transform public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests.... transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps..."  Ervin Laszlo  A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order.  Laszlo laid the groundwork for the social agenda of global control via environmental issues, i.e. the Rio Conference, 1992.  According to Laszlo man's purpose, purpose found through discourse and not through revelation, liberates man from God (a closed system of right and wrong) and allows man to be one with nature. Other web source: Who is Ervin Laszlo? Globalist (dialectical) books he has published. The quest to prevent Armageddon via global dialogue (internal-external collective discourse), i.e. cosmic planetary consciousness ("we are it" "all of humanity as one being" "become conscious of our unconscious collectedness" "we must live as one body") following the belief of noosphere, Vernadsky-"an important pioneer of the scientific bases for the environmental sciences") via kabbalah: video

    To "the enlightened," the didactic paradigm (a closed system of thought) is seen as a non-sensuous based belief system.  According to their paradigm, fixed law, established by a patriarch and then enforced by a patriarch paradigm, is regarded as the mechanism of repression.  Proper behavior, contingent upon faith in someone in authority, is correlated with Fascism (as advocated by Erick Fromm Escape from Freedom, Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality, and Benjamin Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book II: Affective Domain "Weltanschauung¹" p. 166 )

"Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities." Jude 7, 8 

    In a dialectical paradigm, the didactic-patriarchal paradigm is treated with disrespect. It is ridiculed. It is written off as as nonsense (non-sensuous based).  According to Norman O. Brown, imposed laws are the source of conflict (contradiction) when they interfere with any natural self-environmental relationships. Patriarchal laws cause alienation―estrangement (Verfremdung) from others―a self-environmental dialectical rift. When laws are presented in a "formal-logical" construct (obey vs. disobey) it limits the "normal" praxis of earthy desires (compromise, tolerance of deviancy, sensuous discovery of purpose).  Such laws are to be "struggled" against (resisted, put up a fuss) until the system which created and promoted them gives up―is negated by its own act of abdication.  Traditional Marxism killed the person for his property while Transformational Marxism talks the person into hand over their property for the sake of the village or experience social isolation (called shaming in the soviet system). The didactic (right vs.wrong) paradigm  must not only be negated in the mind of the person but must also be absent from the life experience of the home, and the praxis of the community.  This is revolutionary praxis, when "theory and practice" (sensuous self desires and sensuous environmental experiences) are "rationally" and experientially united―consensus. 

    As can be deciphered from the following quotations, the conscience becomes seared in the praxis of consensus―con-sensuous.

Formal-Logical law of Contradiction defines the traditional family environment. Setting the stage for circumventing God and His Word. “Social control is most effective at the individual level. The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated.”1 “The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior.”1 “Unfortunately, because of the reduction of influence exerted by neighbors, the extended family and even the family, social control is now often more dependent on external control, than on internal self-control.”1 [No mention of God and His Word] "Shift in philosophy about police duties vs. community responsibilities to a team concept of  Total Quality Management of the community. Reidentifying the police role as a Facilitator in the community."2 “Identifying common ground, where all factions of a community can work together for the common good of the community in a broader problem-solving approach. Forming a partnership between police and the rest of the community where each is accountable to each other and the community as whole."2 "Leaders of the community (law enforcement, government, business, education, health, civic, non-profit, medical, religious, etc.) collaborating to identify problems in the community… and suggesting solutions to those problems.”2 “The theme underlying much of the research is that once you can identify a community, you have discovered the primary unit of society above the level of the individual and the family that can be mobilized to take concerted action to bring about positive social change.”1 “The community of interest generated by crime, disorder and fear of crime becomes the goal to allow community policing officer an entree into the geographic community.”1   1 Trojanowicz, The meaning of “Community” in Community Policing  (emphasis added) 2 COPS Community Oriented Policing Services US Department of Justice “Family organization is the nucleus of all social organization.” “What we call ‘conscience’ perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves." “The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself.” Normal O. Brown Life Against Death "Using social environment forces to change the parents behavior toward the child." Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality If the parents don't chasten their children, for fear of the village outcry and the power of the DHS-Department of Human Services, the conscience of the child will not be developed to a fear of higher authority (a biblical paradigm). Thus a police state controlled by the DHS will triumph over the home and the community.  Social-psychologists therefore will rule over the world of debauchery. Their "heaven" on earth.  Dean Gotcher "Human rights and duties are grounded in the institutions and ideologies of a culture, not in a nature independent of man’s social relationships. If human rights are to be guaranteed, they must be guaranteed by appropriate social, political, and economic controls of human behavior, not by opposition to these." "The rights of private judgment can be defensibly defined and enforced on a democratic basis only by processes of collaborative planning. They cannot be guaranteed by dogmas concerning the nature of man." "To the democratic planner 'dogmas' are seen methodologically as 'intellectual' attempts to save some privileged position from open collective criticism and modification." "How to convert the perception of favored principles by those who hold them from dogmas to 'hypotheses' remains a central problem for democratic social engineers." "... changing human relations; for, inevitably, it must consider not only what 'is' and what 'can be' but also, what 'ought to be'." Kenneth Benne Human Relations in Curriculum Change “The major implication . . . was the transformation of the family’s role in the process of socialization.” Martin Jay The Dialectical Imagination: The History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950 “The family thus may be considered to be the psychological agent of the society.” Erick Fromm Escape from Freedom (emphasis above added) It is absolutely chilling to understand the implications of these statements above. For a better overview of this material listen to Phil Wort's presentation on COPS.

The Agenda: "detoxification" of the traditional family experience.
(Turning the fear of judgment into the mocking of those who believe and preach it.)
For the sake of social harmony

“The conception of the ideal family situation for the child: uncritical obedience to the father and elders, pressures directed unilaterally from above to below, inhibition of spontaneity and emphasis on conformity to externally imposed values.” Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality

    The dialectical process in praxis (group therapy) is used to coach those under the influence of patriarchal authority how to prevail over their fear of chastisement and to consciously outwit such a system of "repression."  They become adept in sidestepping an obedience/disobedience definition of behavior and thus are able to justify behavior with what was originally labeled, by traditionally minded parents, teachers, ministers, etc., as deviant―"polymorphously perverse"―behavior. No matter how "caring" or "nice" the counselor (change agent) may seem to be and no matter how dire the situation may appear to be this is the leaven they bring into the loaf.

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6

    The traditional home, with its obedience based paradigm, is considered the cause of the self-environmental dialectical rift.  All of psychological counseling is built upon eradicating the cause of this rift―the patriarchal family and the patriarchal culture (as the quotations below make clear), through the use of "re-education."  Yes, dad and mom are not perfect, but the office is. It is the office, given by God, that the New World Order seeks to eradicate from the face of the earth.  It only takes a little leaven in the home and in the neighborhood to pressure the parents into abdicating the office.    I Corinthians 5:6  The universal quest is to bring the community between the parent and the child, to force the parent into abdicating their child to the universal village. “Any non-family-based (dialectic) collectivity that intervenes between parent and child and attempts to regulate and modify the parent-child relationship will have a democratizing (antipatriarchal) impact on that relationship . . . any intervention between parent and child tend to produce familial democracy regardless of its intent.” Warren Bennis The Temporary Society  Thus when the parent-child patriarchal home is forced by socialist laws (DHS) to abdicate to community (commun-ist) demands the parent-child patriarchal home is annihilated. "Thus, for instance, once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the holy family, the former must itself be annihilated [vernichtet] theoretically and practically." Karl Marx Theses On Feuerbach #4   To make laws which force parents to substitute chastening with discourse, (replacing "right and wrong" with opinion) is to destroy a nation of free people; a Constitutional Republic built upon "liberty in law, and  Lex-Rex. “In a democratic society a patriarchal culture should make us depressed instead of glad; it is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization.” Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management  “Human consciousness can be liberated from the parental complex only be being liberated from its cultural derivatives, the paternalistic state and the patriarchal God.” Norman Brown Life Against Death.  “… once the parent can in any way imagine his own orientation to be a possible liability to the child in the world approaching the authoritarian family is moribund, regardless of whatever countermeasures may be taken.” Warren Bennis ibid.

    "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes." Romans 3:10-18  (see psalm 36:1) Our prisons are filled with spoiled children; the product of a permissive, self-seeking, self-esteem, "I want it 'here and now,'" instant gratification, anti-chastening, dopamine seeking, social-psychology controled society.

    This is "government" sanctioned child abuse. I put government in quotation marks as it is our elected officials, our representatives, who have turned on their own citizens by abdicating to the propaganda of the social-psychologist―transformational Marxists―recognizing and legitimizing their humanist, globalist, perverse agenda. All elected officers, legislative, executive, and judicial now cower in fear under the monster they let in the house.  A poem my mother taught in the one room school house, explains our demise. It is entitled "The spider and the fly."

Ambiguity allows a person to appear moralistic when they are not.  In all actuality they are advancing a political agenda.  Dean Gotcher

"A half truth ... is false since the missing half changes the content of the obvious fact."  Herbert Marcuse Eros and Civilization, 252

    All is not what it "seems to" be.  The DHS presents itself as a saint on the side of the child. It is neither.  It is for it's praxis of a self-environmental dialectical world peace, using cosmic empathy to justify its abusive actions toward the traditional family.  The spirit behind it is sinister, despite the expressions of compassion it uses as front. For all in the "profession" who think they are doing good the following statements reveal the actual intent of this praxis.

“Children are polymorphously perverse. . . . by the standards of normal adult sexuality.” “Infantile sexuality is the pursuit of pleasure obtained through the activity of any and all organs of the human body [touching, seeing, muscular activity, pain, etc.].” “Fore-pleasure is the preliminary play with all parts of the body, and represent a perpetuation of the pure polymorphous perverse play of infantile sexuality.” “ “Psychoanalysis declares the fundamental bisexual character of human nature; .... The ‘magical’ body of occidental mysticism, and the ‘diamond’ body of oriental mysticisms, and, in psychoanalysis, the polymorphously perverse body of childhood.” “Dionysus affirms the dialectical unity of the great instinctual opposites: reunifies male and female, Self and Others, life and death.” Norman O. Brown Life Against Death

“Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself ‘What would my parents want me to do?’ During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself ‘What does it mean to me?’”  Carl Rogers On becoming a person

"Without exception, patients enter group therapy with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group--their primary family."  Irwin Yalom The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy

". . . 'to expose the patient, under more favorable circumstances, to emotional situations which he could not handle in the past.  ... undergo a corrective emotional experience suitable to repair the traumatic influence of pervious experience.' Franz Alexander, 1946 in Ibid.

"Through the therapist's continued willingness to verbalize and to confront the calamity calmly, patients gradually realize the irrationality of the feared calamity."  Ibid.

"The therapist assists the patient to clarify the nature of the imagined danger and then ... to detoxify, to disconfirm the reality of this danger."  Ibid. (emphasis added)

He reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role he once occupied.  ... the patient changes the past by reconstituting it."  Ibid.

"There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." Ibid.

CONTRAST VS. SIMILAR

For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. 1 Corinthians 1:21 

God's wisdom is based on contrast―light-dark, creator-created―while the worlds wisdom is based on what it has in common―human nature-human rights-Eros, i.e. what God calls reprobate. Romans 1:28, 2 Corinthians 13:5, 2 Timothy 3:8, Titus 1:16.

    The United Nations knows that in a "face to face, informal meeting," leaders and representatives compromise their allegiance to their country and become devoted to the global cause―the common cause.  True representation can only exist with contrast between differing parties whereas Socialism―Democracy―can only exist with identifying and focusing upon what is common between differing parties.  National sovereignty is maintained in across the table, formal meetings―recognizing differences between nations―as the UN says “. . . attitudes which make for national aggression," and globalism is engendered in face to face, informal meetings―discovering what is similar between people―". . . attitudes that increase international understanding.”  Source: Tensions that cause war ... a group of men brought together by UNESCO 1950 

    I can not overemphasize how important this is to know.  If you are to understand the paradigm shift which has taken place in the USA, you must comprehend the shift from formal to informal meetings and the language which manifests itself in such meetings―"Is ours" and "Not yours," formal, contrast language has been replaced with  "We 'ought' to ...." informal,  "what we have in common" language.  To take such a shift in language is the destruction of the culture of obedience to parents, to law, and particularly to God and the creation of a culture of disobedience to parents, to law, and particularly to God.

consensus

    In the environment of similar, contrast (secular v. sacred) is negated―neutralized, marginalized, and then removed.  Neutralized when everyone―the We―has equal input, marginalized when the We then refuse to listen to you, and removed when the We decide you are being divisive and you need to go, or you realize you are no longer being listened to by the We and you decide to leave on your own. The Emerging Church is built upon this process of merging the secular and sacred, the negating of contrast.

 "Ingroup-Outgroup"

    In the environment of contrast, similar is regarded as conspiratorial and judged as most evil―heresy/treason/deception. It is reflected in the phrase "Evil company corrupts good morals."  A person with this paradigm must either repent, convert, or leave/die.  “Obedience and loyalty are the first requirements of the ingroup member. What is called power‑seeking and clannishness in the outgroup is transformed into moral righteousness, self‑defense, and loyalty in the ingroup.” “The ingroup must be kept pure and strong. The only methods of doing this are to liquidate the outgroups altogether, to keep them entirely subordinate, or to segregate them in such a way as to minimize contact with the ingroups.”  Theodor Adorno The Authoritarian Personality 

    None of these options (liquidate, subordinate, segregate), as listed by the Marxist Theodor Adorno, are given by God to the church, the called out ones―out of darkness into light as a solution. The church is, like pilgrims and strangers, in the world, but not of the world―not similar. 1 Peter 2:9-11 To build upon this worlds dialectical system is the purpose of the Apostate Church. Those who praxis it hypocritically accuse the patriarchal of liquidating, subordinating, and segregating while they themselves liquidating, subordinating, and segregating those who do not conform to their self-environmental dialectical unity. The true Church of God's making does not build itself upon the "felt" needs of man (temporal, common-disobedient, customer driven) but rather upon Christ (spiritual, holy―obedient, Lord lead). Justification, for the Church, is not built upon man's sensuous temporal common "felt" needs but is found in Christ Jesus, the chief cornerstone, unmingled with human reasoning, flow charts, facilitated meetings, poles and surveys, etc.  Ephesians 2:20

"Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed. But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should show forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy." 1 Peter 2:5-10

"I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat." 1 Corinthians 5:9-11

    I write here as a Christian whose Lord has stated that this world is not his kingdom. John 18:36  Unlike any other religion whose claim is repent, convert, or die, it is in God's hands to determine the time of death and the eternal resting place for those who reject Him and His Word and it is not mine.  I am simply to follow Christ and be a witness of His mercy and grace in the life I now live in him; by His blood, by my testimony in Him, and by my not loving this life to the end―to endure does not imply vengeance. "Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord." Romans 12:19 

    Yet I must expose those who praxis heresy/treason.  My faith does not negate my right to protect my person, my family, my neighbors, and my nation, from enemies―foreign and domestic―for conscience sake. The one thing that I can not do is defend my faith.  It defends me, not from the environment, but from my self―my carnal nature―and its desire to fellowship with the environment, i.e. to worship the creation. I must let God and His word defend me for my eternal soul's sake. "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee." Psalms 119:11 The self-environmental dialectical union, when applied to the laws of the nation I live in, usurp my right of faith.

Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them. Colossians 3:5-7

    The inalienable (no man can put a lien upon) rights recognized by our framing fathers (of the U. S. A.) were foundational to each sovereign state's identity―every citizen has the right of faith, faith which protects them from their carnal-socialist-environmentalist-cosmic focusing nature.  Communism―communitarianism, socialism, globalism, humanism, environmentalism, internationalism, etc.―building upon the dialectical praxis of synthesizing self and environment―seeks to remove those rights.  They can not exist with those rights in place.  They always remove rights by redefining them as privileges.  They do this by getting those in authority to change or shift their focus.  To no longer focus upon contrast (didactic) but to focus upon similar (dialectic) i.e. those things which we all have in common―our carnal nature, our common "felt" needs―is what unites us. Broad is that path.

    "One for all and all for one"―consensus―removes my right of humbling and denying myself before a holy and just God and restricts me from proclaiming my faith to the world so that others may come to know Him and proclaim their faith in Him to the world. Dialectical censorship is to 1. prevent men from worshiping God in private―proclaim God's judgment upon evil in his private domain, i.e. seen as an act of neurosis―and 2. prevent him from proclaim God's judgment upon evil in the public domain, particularly in policy setting environments (from the home to the highest offices of the land, to the church itself) i.e. seen as propagating neurosis.

"Work done by Horkheimer in the thirties identified 'neurosis as a social product, in which the family was seen as a primary agent of repressive socialization.'" “A logical connection emerges with the anthropological perspective of the young Marx wherein ‘the eye becomes the human eye, the ear the human ear.’” Erich Fromm, Marx’s Concept of Man, New York, 1961, p. 133  Stephen Eric Bronner Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists p. 212

“Every neurosis is an example of dynamic adaptation; it is essentially an adaptation to such external conditions as are in themselves irrational and, generally speaking, unfavorable to the growth of the child.” Erich Fromm, Escape from Freedom

"Adult sexuality, restricted by rules, to maintain family and society, is a clear instance of repression; and therefore leads to neurosis.” "The repression of normal adult sexuality is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination." “The abolition of repression would only threaten patriarchal domination.” “Freud, Hegel, and Nietzsche are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force in order to explain repression.” Brown, Norman O. LIFE AGAINST DEATH. Middletown Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 1959 

“The more gratifying one’s sexual life is, the more fulfilling and pleasurable is one’s work.” “It is necessary to establish not only the best external conditions of work, but also to create the inner biologic preconditions to allow the fullest unfolding of the biologic urge for activity.” “Hence, the safeguarding of a completely satisfying sexual life for the working masses is the most important precondition of pleasurable work.” “Sex-economy sociology was born from the effort to harmonize Freud’s depth psychology with Marx’s economic theory.” “Since work and sexuality (in both the strict and broad senses of the word) are intermately interwoven, man’s relationship to work is also a question of the sex-economy of masses of people.” “Every effort must be made and all means employed to guard future generations against the influence of the biologic rigidity of the old generation.” “The principle weapon on the arsenal of freedom is each new generation’s tremendous urge to be free. The possibility of social freedom rests essentially upon this weapon and not upon anything else.” “Every physician, educator, and social worker etc., who is to deal with children and adolescents will have to prove that he himself or she herself is healthy from a sex-economic point of view and that he or she has acquired exact knowledge on human sexuality between the ages of one and about eighteen.” “… the education of the educators in sex-economy must be made mandatory.” “Work and sexuality derive from the same biologic energy.” “Psychoanalysis is the mother, sociology the father, of sex-economy.” “The child’s and adolescent’s natural love of life must be protected by clearly defined laws.” “Those forces in the individual and in the society that are natural and vial must be clearly separated form all the obstacles that operate against the spontaneous functioning of this natural vitality.” “It is the elimination of all obstacles to freedom that has to be achieved.” “Natural sociability and morality are present in men and women. What has to be eliminated is the disgusting moralizing which thwarts natural morality and then points to the criminal impulses, which it itself has brought into being.” “Sexually awakened women, affirmed and recognized as such, would mean the complete collapse of the authoritarian ideology.” “the right of the woman to her own body.” “The termination of pregnancy is at variance with the meaning of the family, whose task it precisely the education of the coming generation – apart from the fact that the termination of pregnancy would mean the final destruction of the large family.” “The preservation of the already existing large families is a matter of social feeling; . . the large family is preserved because national morality and national culture find their strongest support in it.”  Wilhelm Reich THE MASS PSYCHOLOGY OF FASCISM Translated by Vincent r. Cargagno. The Noonday Press, New York, 1946 4th printing 1971 p. 295 

“This carry-over from the study of neurosis to the study of labor in factories is legitimate.” “Work is not about paying the rent anymore--it is about self-fulfillment.” “Enlightenment management and humanistic supervision can be a brotherhood situation.” “Partnership is the same as synergy.” “The United States is changing into a managerial society.” “In our democratic society, any enterprise--any individual--has its obligations to the whole.” “Tax credits would be given to the company that helps to improve the whole society, and helps to improve the democracy by helping to create democratic individuals.” “The goals of democratic education can be nothing else but development toward psychological health.” Abraham Maslow Maslow on Management  John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1998

"So it looks as if nudism is the first step toward ultimate fee-animality-humanness.  It's the easiest to take.  Must encourage it. Only trouble is, I fgeel uneasy allying myself with nuts, fringe people, borderline characters, e.g. as in this number of ANKH; the tipoff―there are only young, shapely, & beautiful bodies." "Yet nakedness is absolutely right. So is the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations. Must move in the direction of the Reichian orgasm." "This movement can be dignified and Apollonian & can avoid pornography & neurosis & ugliness. I must put as much of this as is possible & usable in my education book, & more & more in succeeding writings."  "Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa."  ". . . I’ve decided to get into the World Federalists, become pro-UN, & the like."  "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & cost much blood." ". . . A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the humanistic. (Better add to definition of “humanistic” that it also means one species, One World.)" "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first--it certainly doesn’t amount to much now & won’t until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'"  Excerpts from The Journals of A.H. Maslow, Volumes I and II.
Lowry R.J. (1979)

"To identify with more and more of the world, moving toward the ultimate of mysticism, a fusion with the world, or peak experience, cosmic consciousness, etc."  Maslow on Management, Abraham Maslow, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1998. p. 42

    Thus, according to those seeking and promoting a world of self-environmental dialectical unity all who  praxis neurosis (think didactically and seek to promote and sustain a patriarchal paradigm) must be prevented from attaining a platform of influence in the public domain, for their own "good" and for the "good" of others.  An example follows on how this is done in a facilitated meeting:

“In the first phase various members of the group quickly attempt to establish their customary places in the leadership hierarchy [seek to establish a patriarchal paradigm].” “Next comes a period of frustration and conflict brought about by the leader’s steadfast rejection of the concept of peck order and the authoritarian atmosphere in which the concept of peck order is rooted [the facilitators role is to prevent the establishment of a patriarchal paradigm, frustrating any efforts to do so]."  “The third phase sees the development of cohesiveness among the members of the group, accompanied by a certain amount of complacency and smugness [giving up on traditional leadership the group starts to turn to itself to solve the problem at hand].” [an unstable stage] “In the fourth phase the members retain the group-centeredness and sensitivities which characterized the third phase, but they develop also a sense of purpose and urgency which makes the group potentially and effective social instrument [those in the group no longer seek approval from an outside source, i.e. parent, boss, constituents, God, etc. but rather seek approval from within the group - "group think"].”  Kenneth Benne Human Relations in Curriculum Change

    Be warned. Under the "right of the child" the home is public domain. The patriarchal father of the traditional home must be sent to the guillotines (the patriarch beheaded; i.e. either those under his influenced must be removed or he must be either convert or neutralize, marginalize, and removed if necessary; all "solutions" result in a praxis of patricide) if he does not follow the directorates public policies "for the people, by the people, of the people."  In this case his children will be taken from him. Instead of "Click it or ticket" it will be "If you spank em, well take em." 

"For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.  If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?  But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons." Hebrews 12:6-8

The use of fear to pressure citizens out of their right of faith

"For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind." 2 Timothy 1:7

    "For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.
    The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together." Romans 8:13-17

    The diabolical process of consensus uses those things in the environment such as job promotion, good grades, next term in office, etc., to force me (through the fear of lose of something in my life if I don't participate) to "look into myself" and "get in touch with myself," and to quit "denying myself," and to "esteem myself," and to "actualize myself," etc. so I can make the group "feel" good about themselves. This is the worst form of treason. This is the form of treason which enslaves its own citizens with their own will―carnal will. "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination [a person's weakness] to behavior―the motives, the desires, the wished.  The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises.." Carl Rogers quoting B. F. Skinner On becoming a person  (bold emphasis in original as italics) 

    Subtly, suggestions are used to seduce, deceive and manipulate each person into a group hug, a communal praxis of "cosmic" harmony, an annihilation of a didactic paradigm with the establishment of a dialectical paradigm.

"… new models are … acquired subtly, as a result of overt or covert suggestion, unconscious identification with the therapist, corrective emotional experiences … operant conditioning via implicit or explicit expressions of his approval or disapproval." Irvin Yalom Theory and Practice and Group Psychotherapy 

Labor of love replacing the shedding of blood.

    Love in the dialectical praxis of self-environment unity is the meeting of self and others "felt" needs (See Maslow's hierarchy of "felt" needs.)  This labor of love is demonstrated by the non-profit institution, which Church Growth and the Emerging Church is structured from. Why do people work for nothing?  Because of the satisfaction they get from helping satisfy others needs.  What do they get in return? Human approval; i.e. the respect of men.  This is the Eros the Marxists, like Herbert Marcuse Eros and Civilization, Erick Fromm The Art of Loving, and  Abraham Maslow, preached in the 60's. It is now being preached from pulpits and praxised by churches around the world. 

    But love, from God's definition, is not the satisfaction we get from the meeting of others "felt" needs, what we have done for our family, our community, our country, our world, but what he has done for us.  It is found not in the pleasure of social harmony, but in proclaiming the truth of God's love, found in Christ Jesus, which causes social disharmony, for the sake of man's soul and his eternal life; to the shedding of blood, not of others or even our own, but His.  "Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sin." The NGO, non-profit, apostate church, built upon the meeting of mans "felt" needs, is founded upon Eros (the respect of men), the true church, built upon God's love, is founded upon the blood of the lamb (God's love for us). One starts with a survey of "felt" needs, the other starts with the preaching of God's word to repentance. The church is made up of the redeemed not the unregenerate.

“Re-education must be clever enough in manipulating the subjects to have them think that they are running the show.”  “The objective sought will not be reached so long as the new set of values is not experienced by the individual as something freely chosen.”  “An outright enforcement of the new set of values and beliefs is simply the introduction of a new god who has to fight with the old god, now regarded as a devil.”  "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to a group.”  “A feeling of complete freedom and a heightened group identification are frequently more important at a particular stage of re-education than learning not to break specific rules.”  Kenneth Benne Human Relations in Curriculum Change, 1950; Chapter 3 Principles of Re-education Kurt Lewin and Paul Grabbe “Conduct, Knowledge, and Acceptance of New Values” The Journal of Social Issues, 1:3:56-65 August, 1945

    Those who praxis the fusion of the  self-environment dialectical rift always declare war on their own "citizens." They must do so to find those who hold to an "old 'system of values and beliefs." This process is not successful until all are participants. Therefore all "citizen" must be treaded as guilty until they are proven innocent by their "willful" participation in and promotion of "the new system of values and beliefs."  In education this is experienced by teachers during in-service training, in government it is experienced by legislators in sub-committee meetings, in the workplace it is experienced by all in the team building session, and in the church it is experienced by believers in youth activities, "bible studies," and board meetings.  

    "If the individual complies merely from fear of punishment rather than through the dictates of his free will and conscience [this combination is where a person is willing to finding the middle ground―compromise―to maintain relationships for the purpose of acceptance/advancement], the new set of values he is expected to accept does not assume in him the position of super-ego [the super-ego―incorporating similar (what we have in common)―is not the same thing as the conscience―based on contrast (right vs. wrong)], and his re-education [paradigm shift] therefore remains unrealized." "How can free acceptance of a new system of values be brought about? The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to a group.  [From then on] the new system of values and beliefs dominates the individual's perception ['group think,' 'village think']." Kurt Lewin quoted in Kenneth Benne's Human Relations in Curriculum Change   (emphasis added) 

    This is why it is so difficult to persuade those in Church Growth or the Emerging Church of the danger this process poses to their soul, even though it is so clearly revealed to you by the Word of God.  Amazingly this act of "attending" to the things at hand in the environment to actualize one's potential is exactly the same procedure used by Satan on Eve in the Garden of Eden.

"To identify with more and more of the world, moving toward the ultimate of mysticism, a fusion with the world, or peak experience, cosmic consciousness, etc." Maslow on Management, Abraham Maslow, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1998. p. 42

“The person at the peak experience is godlike . . . complete, loving, uncondemning, compassionate and accept[ing] of the world and of the person.” Abraham Maslow Toward a Psychology of Being

"He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil."  John 3:18, 19  "If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?" John 3:12

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is to change it." Karl Marx

    The dialectical paradigm is the praxis of heresy. It is the praxis of change rather than the praxis of obedience. As stated above it always declares war on its own citizens.  All must be considered and treated as an enemy, all must be considered guilty of didactic thinking (God gives us all a measure of faith) and all must be re-educated before they can properly demonstrate dialectical thinking" (enlightened-sensuous based reasoning) before they are considered "innocent" (works salvation, participatory democracy) considered "self-actualized".

    The new guilt complex appears to be historically connected with the rise of patriarchal religion (for the Western development the Hebrews are decisive)." “The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself.” "We must return to Freud and say that incest guilt created the familial organization." "Human consciousness can be liberated from the parental (Oedipal) complex only be being liberated from its cultural derivatives, the paternalistic state and the patriarchal God." “The abolition of repression would only threaten patriarchal domination.” “Freud, Hegel, and Nietzsche are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force in order to explain repression.” Norman O. Brown   LIFE AGAINST DEATH  

    “The most effective method for weakening the child’s will is to arouse his sense of guilt.” “The most important symptom of the defeat in the fight for oneself is the guilty conscience.”  “We are proud that in his conduct of life man has become free from external authorities, which tell him what to do and what not to do.”  Erick Fromm Escape from Freedom

  Excerpt from the Article on Diaprax

Jürgen Habermas and World "Peace"

by Dean Gotcher

February, 2006

   When the child is given the freedom to redefine the parents' commands, their laws, in light of the child's own desires (belonging to that which is in the environment, the temporal other) the child circumvents the obedience structure of the law (obey or disobey, be blessed or punished, based upon the parents' or God's commands) and the guilty conscience is replaced with a disregard or contempt toward the parental figure and the patriarch system.  The same is true of adults, i.e. legislators, owners of businesses, ministers, etc.  The whole community is affected when such procedures are introduced through local institutions, schools, councils, churches, businesses, etc.. 

    By allowing your child, your spouse, your representatives, your defender of the faith to engage in this diabolical dialectical discursive environment, you loose your child, your spouse, your representative, your proclaimers of the faith, to the world system, to the new world order.  Just know that this process does not consider itself successful until no one can escape, and that it always declares war on its own citizens.  Remember the French and Russian revolutions.  This process is all about patricide (sanitization-to make more acceptable by removing unpleasant or undesired features, Merriam-Webster), killing the patriarch figure, the father figure in the family, the community, the work place, and in the church, all for the sake of world peace.  In mans quest for world piece based on the language of tolerance (only for the left, not for the right) he forgets the fact that the word "tolerance" is not showing up on the day of judgment.  And foolishly does not realize that hell is permanent.  Jesus Christ did not promise peace on this earth.  It can only be found in Him.  He is the way (the only way), the truth, and life.  No man can come to the Heavenly Father but by Him and that requires a patriarchal paradigm of faith and obedience.

“We must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions[*] in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue.”  Kenneth Benne Human Relations in Curriculum Change   * people with principles, not swayed by opinions of men.

    Dialectical trickery can only be accomplished by shifting a person's paradigm from an obedience-based environment (Jesus Christ in the wilderness) to an evaluation based environment (Eve in the Garden of Eden, the ten spies in the promised land, etc.).  From a paradigm where right behavior produces blessing and wrong behavior produces wrath―commands which are spiritually and not temporally understood, not materially comprehendible, laws not found in and justified by the material environment or laws which are at odds with immediate temporal desires―to a paradigm where if rational, sensual, desires can be apprehended in the environment they can be justified and exercised in the environment, where the obey vs. disobey closed system is considered as non-sense, impractical, unreasonable, and/or irrational, in light of this "open minded" system, i.e. systems thinking, general systems theory, synergy, etc. "Partnership is the same as synergy. The problem for the accountants is to work out some way of putting on the balance sheet the amount of synergy in the organization, the amount of time and money and effort that has been invested in getting groups to work together."  Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management  This was the very same purpose driving the soviet system. Hummm?

Example of dialectical trickery used in the court system. The Law: "Every system of law known to civilized society generated from or had as its component one of two well known systems of ethics, stoic or Christian. The COMMON LAW draws its subsistence from the latter, its roots go deep into that system, the Christian concept of right and wrong or right and justice motivates every rule of equity.  It is the guide by which we dissolve domestic friction's and the rule by which all legal controversies are settled."  Strauss Vs. Strauss., 3 So. 2nd  727, 728, (1941) The dialectical trickery of the court "There has always been strong support for the view that life does not begin until live birth.  This was the belief of the Stoics." ROE v. WADE, 410 U.S. 113  15, (1973) The Law: "The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights nor pro